Vaccine safety evidence
We are not “anti-VAXers.” We were vaccinated because we believed we were being told the truth. Now we know better.
Unfortunately, the current gene-based vaccines (all vaccines on the US market today) were rushed to market without proper testing. They are dangerous and appear to have killed over 30,000 previously healthy Americans so far and disabled an equivalent number.
The Phase 3 trials were structured so that the results looked good because they were allowed to exclude unfavorable data (such as Maddie de Garay, a 12-year old girl who participated in the Pfizer trial and who is now permanently paralyzed due to the vaccine). People with a bad first reaction were allowed to drop out which doesn’t reflect the reality of “full vaccination” requirements of workplaces and schools.
We should stop the current gene-based vaccines ASAP. The risk/benefit justification isn’t there for any age group due to the poor safety profile of these vaccines compared with the alternatives.
Based on analysis of VAERS death data for vaccine deaths and CDC death data for COVID deaths, the younger you are, the less sense vaccination makes. If early treatments didn’t work at all, the toxicity of the current vaccines would only make sense for those over 30 (based data to date). However, the vaccines are too toxic and don’t meet the <50 deaths stopping criteria that we’ve used for the past 30 years, so they should never be used because we have better alternatives available today that can achieve the same goals.
We should never be giving vaccines that disable or kill previously healthy people in huge numbers if safer alternatives are available that can achieve all the same objectives.
Why would anyone in America choose to have lipid nanoparticles which deliver a toxic protein into your brain and where the long term effects are unknown, when safer alternatives are available? What parent would choose to experiment on their kids this way when safer and more effective options are available?
It is tragic that schools are requiring students to be vaccinated in order to attend classes. I’ve asked our top universities for the risk-benefit analysis to justify this action and have received nothing. If the vaccines were perfectly safe, no analysis would be needed. But they aren’t.
The rate of severe life-changing side effects appears to be well in excess of 25,000 people (the number reported disabled is comparable to the number dead). The fact that Facebook groups of vaccine victims had 200,000 users suggests that more than 1 in 1,000 are suffering from significant long-term impacts; people with minor temporary reactions have little incentive to seek out and sign up for a vaccine side-effects group.
People who claim “the clinical trials showed no significant side effects so it must be safe” have a tough time explaining how these facebook groups were so large before they were deleted. If you think the vaccines are so safe, show me the severity analysis of the 200,000 people there. These groups don’t appear with the influenza vaccine. You never see neurological effects like this in such high volume with a safe vaccine.
Some have cited the emergence of the Delta variant as changing the math to favor vaccination even if the vaccine is unsafe. But the case fatality rate (CFR) of the Delta variant is only 0.1 percent compared to the CFR of 1.9 percent for the original virus (alpha) according to UK government data. The argument that the lower CFR of delta is due to the higher number of vaccinated people isn’t very credible since the Eta variant has a 2.7 percent CFR.
Early treatments are a more effective and safer option than the current vaccines. We can achieve all of the objectives of the current vaccination program (herd immunity, eradication of the virus, re-opening our economy, ditching of masks) with fewer deaths and near zero serious side effects. In addition, we would have less problem with variants since variants are less likely to be generated if everyone is naturally immune. So why not promote early treatments? Why not give them a try for a month while we hit the pause button on the vaccines? Would that be so bad?
Allowing natural infection will impart broad natural immunity. We should instruct the population how to treat early with early treatment protocols as soon as they believe they are infected. People should have the drugs on-hand so that treatment can be started without delay after speaking with their doctor. This results in superior risk reduction in terms of fewer fatalities and side effects compared to the current vaccines.
There was never a need for masking or social distancing as COVID is very treatable when treated early. Nobody has to die or be hospitalized. We can get to herd immunity quickly this way. The key is to treat the virus early with a proven early treatment cocktail of repurposed drugs, adding novel antivirals if/when available.
Unfortunately, the NIH has unethically suppressed all early treatments in order to push the vaccine narrative. This is clear with the publication of a systematic review of ivermectin, the highest level of evidence possible. Yet the NIH and WHO pretend that it never happened. It isn’t even acknowledged that the systematic review came out. There has never been a peer-reviewed systematic review that was later overturned. This is why they are the top of the evidence pyramid.
Early treatments were never funded. When evidence came in they worked, the NIH ignored it. The corruption at the NIH and FDA should be corrected by Congress. Now.
To prove the point about the unethical suppression of early treatments, I offered $2M to anyone who could show that the NIH got it right. Nobody stepped forward.
Similarly, I offered $1M to anyone who could show that the vaccines are safe. No takers, not even the drug companies.
If a safe sterilizing vaccine can be developed, we should test it adequately for safety before deploying it. We should not cut corners on safety again; with early treatments, there is no need to rush this.
Major medical journals have lost objectivity in publishing papers that go against the “safe” narrative. For example, the NEJM rejected a Letter to the Editor pointing out a flaw in a paper showing vaccines were safe for pregnant women. The Letter showed an alarming statistic. The NEJM refused to reveal their reasoning for the rejection. Three editors quit a journal after a peer-reviewed paper was published that showed that vaccination may cause more harm than good. Those who quit provided no evidence that the paper was in error.
The censorship of legitimate medical information on social networks must end. These networks are the new “public square” and should be regulated so that people are free to express their opinions to anyone who chooses to listen. There should be heavy monetary penalties for suppressing medical information that has the potential to save lives. Social networks should be required to compensate all those people who have been harmed by their actions.
Never again should we deploy a vaccine on the American public without proper testing and without informed consent. Databases such as V-SAFE that track safety data should be made transparent. Am I the only person who thinks that is a problem?
VAERS reporting should be required and the VAERS system should be modernized so that it is easy to use and results in records with consistent field coding. There should be a smaller lag time to get records into the database, all false reports should be 100% enforced as a criminal act, and the safety signal monitoring should be much stronger.
The cost-benefit analysis of the current gene-based vaccines for anyone of any age is at best a wash according to the scientific literature (new paper published June 24, 2021). This peer-reviewed paper looked at the real cost-benefit analysis and concluded that “This lack of clear benefit should cause governments to rethink their vaccination policy.” As far as I know, this is the most optimistic of all the papers looking at actual death rates of COVID vs. the vaccine. All the other ones are even worse for the vaccine.
Independent analysis by a statistician friend shows a similar effect. Like me, Mathew has no axe to grind here, just trying to get at the truth of the risk/benefit for the current vaccines. His conclusion: “More importantly, I also still disagree with the mass vaccination program. In particular, nearly all lives saved are in the high risk group. While vaccinating those in the low risk group might decrease spread into the high risk group, that’s asking young healthy people to act as human shields.
I also believe that when the vaccine deaths and adverse events are finally tallied and compared to either a ring vaccination strategy or combination ring vaccination and early treatment strategy, the current plan will look quite foolish and possibly even nefarious.”
Since the focus today is on getting kids vaccinated, I ran the numbers in the VAERS database for 20-24 year olds and 25-29 year olds. In both age ranges, the number of deaths caused by the vaccine outnumber the number of deaths saved. The vaccines caused 1.89 deaths per 100,000 (ages 25-29) and 1.74 deaths per 100,000 (ages 20-24).
This means the vaccines are net killing machines since they kill more people than they save (.3 to 1.0 lives per 100K saved according to the most recent CDC presentation). My calculations are in the body of this document and the calculations show no net benefit for any age group based on real-world data from the US and UK.
The comparison is even more extreme if we tell kids to ignore the current CDC advice and use an early treatment program. In that case, we can reduce the death rate by more than two orders of magnitude from COVID, so that the number of lives saved by the vaccine is fewer than 1 in 10M. This means the vaccines need to be less toxic than the influenza vaccine (which has a death rate of 1 in 10M) in order to be considered. They are not even close to that. Not by a country mile.
For older people, the numbers don’t work out either. We looked at the UK data for <50 and >50 and we found that the absolute death rate is very small for <50 group. There was a high relative risk reduction, but the absolute deaths were small. If the vaccine kills more than 1 in 1 million, it’s game over for the vaccine being useful. For age >50, the UK data shows that even if the vaccines killed nobody, it is not beneficial. So when you factor the death rate of the vaccines and early treatment as the other option, the case is extremely lopsided.
In short, because the current vaccines are so dangerous and early treatment is so effective (relative risk reduction of 100 or more with no permanent side effects), there is no reasonable case that can be made for vaccinating any age group.
Although we just looked at deaths in the analysis above, the same can be true for other side effects as well: the range and intensity of side effects from the vaccine dwarf anything seen in natural COVID. It’s even a more stark contrast when early treatment is added to the mix.
Long term, untreated vax patients and untreated COVID patients are virtually identical in terms of symptoms (thanks to Ram Yogendra for that insight). By vaccinating patients, we are essentially giving a portion of those vaccinated long hauler COVID.
The case numbers in the UK (one of the most heavily vaccinated countries) are now climbing. It suggests we should have listened to the arguments of Geert Vanden Bossche, one of the most famous scientists in the vaccine field, which are further clarified in this excellent video by Chris Martenson which points out that there are really only two ways out of the pandemic: a sterilizing vaccine (using the complete virus as the antigen) or allowing infection and treating with early treatment leading to natural immunity.
The Yellow Card system in the UK showed a similar safety signal. Independent analysis of that data by an expert in medical evidence concluded that the vaccines are unsafe for use in humans. It wasn’t a close call. The death rates from the vaccines are far greater than any absolute risk reduction.
This is taken from a very long article. Read the rest here: docs.google.com
Header image: Getty Images
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
sir_isO
| #
If you’re not anti-vax you’re a moron.
Reply
cnash
| #
If you’re not anti-vax you’re a moron.
True or or trust globalists hacks that want you gone .
The United States and US establishment is still trying desperately for a much higher vaccination rate.
How is it possible that almost all the governments on the planet are in agreement on medical totalitarianism?
Well, it’s rather easy to understand when you realize the majority of them are linked together through globalist institutions like the World Economic Forum, which has repeatedly called the pandemic a “perfect opportunity” to push through their plans for a “Great Reset”.
The “Great Reset” is a long term ideological usurpation of what’s left of individual freedom and free market economies, and it’s goal is the imposition of a global socialist / communist dictatorship.
Why do they want 100% vaccination? Why are they so desperate for every single person in the world to get the mRNA jab?
After all, the average (IFR) death rate of covid is a mere 0.26% of those infected (this is a stat that the media consistently and deliberately refuses to mention to the public). This means that 99.7 percent of the public is in NO danger from covid whether they are vaccinated or not.
This is why the establishment needs a 100 percent vaccination rate; unvaccinated people would stand as evidence of their crime. Let me explain…
My concern is that Klaus Schwab’s reset agenda is impossible to enforce in a permanent way unless the human population is greatly reduced over a short period of time . Globalists are constantly talking about population control and reduction. Elites like Bill Gates are famous for it. Is it any wonder that they would devise a plan to institute it?
They have to force us to be vaccinated as well – ALL of us, so that there is no control group and thus no proof of what they have done. They could simply blame mass deaths on covid itself, or some other false culprit.
Reply
sir_isO
| #
Corporate industrialism. Which is fundamentally about exploitation. To exploit, homogenizd (related to artificial scarcity). If people behave the same, they are superfluous, you understand one of them, you can control all of them. Industry requires stagnation, predicated on the manipulation for homogenization.
Or in other words. Qlippothic anti-life zombiedronerobosheepclone “freemasons”. Souled out, borg.
War of psyche I guess.
Reply
sir_isO
| #
The constant in nature is change.
In industry, they want consistency through denying change. Nature says fuckoff. They try force GMO soy, with discrete manipulative sort of intervation, for the purpose of degeneration, along with about 3 other plants. Coz if you eat the same shit, if you use the same shit, if you beliee the same shit, you’re going to be similarly retarded and toxified. Resulting in predictable means of controlling you.
I tried to explain this homogeneity stuff, and some other things here in the comments section.
https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/sweden-is-following-the-biological-science-not-the-political-science
Reply
sir_isO
| #
Sorry I typed intervention when I meant innervation.
sir_isO
| #
What could happen instead is that I press nuke buttons and 70% of “modern” civilization is eradicated coz the world is a product of the earth. Unlike what you’ve been told to believe.
Reply
Richard Noakes
| #
So this sort of feeds in to the above- your health and safety is no longer your governments responsibility, you are now all owned by Pfizer, body and soul and we can see how caring they have been, along with AstraZeneca and Moderna:
Pfizer vaccine contracts with governments strangle people’s rights with no recourse for obvious malfeasance
Aug 4
Cybersecurity Expert Ehden Biber has legally obtained copies of the Pfizer contracts with Albania, Brazil, Israel and the EU.
He discovered the first one on an Albanian website, where it was published on January 2021. Its veracity was confirmed when he was able to see Brazil’s Pfizer contract, which is virtually identical on that country’s health ministry website, with a signature that was verified by DocuSign. He has since seen virtually same contract with the EU and heard the details of Israel’s Pfizer contract.
The contract, which exposes Pfizer to zero liability for anything and places the liability for everything on the government, which is called the “Purchaser” in the contract.
The deal is a criminal shakedown of epic proportions, the likes of which it is hard to even fathom. Why would anybody sign it?
Reading the contract’s language sheds some light on the inexplicable behavior of the government authorities of the world and on the true nature of this whole COVID operation.
It also may shed light on the untimely deaths of two African presidents and the Haitian president, who all very understandably refused to sign this contract!
In his blog, Biber wrote, “If you were wondering why #Ivermectin was suppressed, well, it is because the agreement that countries had with Pfizer does not allow them to escape their contract, which states that even if a drug will be found to treat COVID19, the contract cannot be voided.”
And here’s a shocking clause about supplying the product:
“Pfizer shall have no liability for any failure to deliver doses in accordance with any estimated delivery dates… nor shall any such failure give Purchaser any right to cancel orders for any quantities of Product.
“Pfizer shall decide on necessary adjustments to the number of Contracted Doses and Delivery Schedule due to the Purchaser … based on principles to be determined by Pfizer … Purchaser shall be deemed to agree to any revision.”
So Pfizer can breach its own contract but their hitmen will kill you if you refuse to sign it!
You can really see how this Globalist entity that is Pfizer hates nation states and will not recognize their laws but it acts like a “government that dictates to other governments around the world,” as Biber says. If we look around at the complete lawlessness and the meltdown of once-solid institutions all over the world, you can see that Big Pharma is being used like a massive battering ram against the national laws and national sovereignty of all nations.
The contract forces the “Purchaser”, which is how they refer to the nation that is contracting with them to defend Pfizer’s interests and not those of the citizens they’re supposed to be representing and defending – and whose taxpayer money they’re using to pay Pfizer these billions of dollars.
As Biber tweeted, Israel has turned into a pharmaceutical #BananaRepublic, where the priorities of a multinational supercedes the priorities of its citizens.
Not only is Pfizer held completely harmless from all claims, the “Purchaser”, ie, the national government is responsible for Pfizer’s legal defense against any and all claims!
However, “Pfizer shall have the right to assume control of such defense… and Purchaser shall pay all Losses, including, without limitation, the reasonable attorneys’ fees and other expenses incurred.” Pfizer makes sure the country will pay for everything.
I really don’t get why governments across the world have signed this. What’s in it for them? Did they sign this voluntarily? It really seems like a colossal shakedown and a complete abdication on the part of these governments to protect their people. It’s malfeasance on a scale that beggars belief.
THE ONLY WAY to get a product recall on these shots is if you can prove fault in Current Good Manufacturing Practice (CGMP), which is regulated by the FDA.
However, CGMP will tell you NOTHING about mRNA, because we don’t have CGMP for an mRNA vaccine, so you cannot prove CGMP malpractice.
CairnsNews
Reply
Richard Noakes
| #
Just wrote this one, thought I would share it with you:
Hey Mr Leader. You want to save lives from Covid with your Experimental Test Vaccines which in America, have been supplied under Emergency Use and have not been approved for General Use (untested) yet and I want to save lives with my free salt water cure against Coronavirus, before it ever gets to be Covid, so why don’t you advertise both methods, for those who don’t want your vaccines and then it is a win/win for your Government, with lives won, instead of lives lost from the Coronavirus, virus, after it becomes Covid Delta, or the new Delta/Lambda Variant in Peru at the moment, the only difference being that I have been doing my salt water cure for 26 years longer than the 7 months your AstraZeneca, Moderna and Pfizer vaccines have been around and I place my total trust in my salt water cure to keep me safe and anyone else who decides to try it – we are, after all, trying to achieve the same thing and save lives, aren’t we?
“Even so, a key issue is that the current vaccines block severe disease “but do not prevent infection”, said Dr. Gregory Poland, a vaccine scientist at the Mayo Clinic. That is because the virus is still capable of replicating in the nose, even among vaccinated people, who can then transmit the disease through tiny, aerosolized droplets” Reuters
Me: My free salt water cure “kills the infection dead”.
The Achilles Heel of Coronavirus, is while it is still in the developing stage as Coronavirus/Covid in the warm, wet areas inside the nasal passages of your head (nose) and before it gets to become Covid in your head and lungs, 10 to 14 days later. If Coronavirus is not treated with my free salt clean water cure to flush out your nasal passages, as soon as possible, or during self isolation, it becomes Covid, which is where the money is. You cannot catch Covid! Always breathe through your nose and keep your mouth shut, because you really don’t want the Coronavirus to seed itself in your lungs!! My free salt water cure has “absolutely nothing” to do with mRNA test vaccines. Treating Coronavirus with my free salt clean water cure, flushes out the nasal cavity and kills Coronavirus, before it gets to be Covid, irrespective of if you have had mRNA vaccines or not. Mix one heaped teaspoon of salt in a mug of warm or cold clean water, cup a hand and pour some of the solution in, then sniff or snort that mugful up into your nose, spitting out everything which comes down into your mouth, by so doing, you flush out your nasal cavity, where Coronavirus lives. If you get a burning sensation (which lasts for 2-3 minutes) then you have a Coronavirus infection.When the soreness goes away, blow out your head with toilet paper and flush away, washing your hands afterwards and continue doing my salt clean water nasal cavity flush cure, morning, noon and night, or more often, if you want, until, when you do my free salt water cure, you don’t experience any soreness at all in your nasal cavity. While you are at it, swallow a couple of mouthfuls and if you get a burning sensation in your chest, then you are killing the Covid/Bronchitis there too, so keep it up, each time you do a salt water sniffle, until the soreness in your head and lungs goes away – job done. Pour some of the solution on a flat surface and allow to dry and see what you have then. This is what coats the nasal passages in your head and kills Coronavirus/Covid off. You can see why it is so effective. This is what I have done for the past 26.5 years and I am NEVER ill, nor do you need to be either.
Reminds me of the English pilot who was flying his plane with passengers onboard, recently, who was able to stop himself from blacking out from a blood clot, but he can’t fly any more – about the same time that those 4 English pilots died from blood clots after getting their Covid vaccines – which weren’t the vaccines, of course…..
Read somewhere that vaccinated passengers should check with their insurer before flying, because the pressurized cabin can cause blood clots and nobody wants to be billed by some overseas hospital and then find their insurance is canceled, because it does not cover in flight blood clots – right?
Richard
Reply
Richard Noakes
| #
We have all been suckered by these vaccines. They are not to stop Covid, that was never their real purpose and the only way that these vaccines could go from the Lab directly into arms was with Biden’s Emergency Use authority and my earlier post about Graphene in the shots, was right on the money.
The purpose of the Covid shots is to deflect everyone from what is really going on behind the scenes and what is really going on here – by the highest Elite of which Bill Gates is one, so if you are thinking of not letting them get away with it, there is a list of the principal players in the enclosed, which I suggest you copy and paste into your word processor and keep for future use and reference, should the link cease to exist.
Full references to the work are provided after the article:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pandemic-beneficiaries-technocrats/
Reply
Alan
| #
The Covid “vaccines” have not gone through the trials to prove their long term safety. However, there has to be evidence to link deaths to the vaccines. We all die one day and perhaps the higher number of deaths amongst the vaccinated are because they are more elderly and the deaths are from other causes.
Reply
sir_isO
| #
Holy shit Alan, you have spike proteins, known to cause all kinds of function in the body. The supposed problem is fallacious. The pre-lim trials had like 25-50% adverse reactions, you have the VAERS and EU reports.
The elderly “hospitalizations decreased by 80%”…yeah, right along with their deaths, because they were in nursing homes and administered toxic shit just as vaccines happened to be administered, at the same time.
I mean, it takes a lot to play bad cop that well.
Reply
sir_isO
| #
known to cause all kinds of DYSfunction in the body.
Excuse me, I’m an alcoholic.
Reply
sir_isO
| #
Vaccines used as “placebo”, trial data unknown for 3 years, the entire vaccination edifice being BULLSHIT. All of pasteur/rockefeller methodology BULLSHIT. The companies, “people” involved already indicted, numerous times…
And you reckon what?
https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/race-for-a-vaccine/side-effects-of-covid-19-vaccine-trail-participant-speaks-out/2417356/
“UCSF Infectious Disease Specialist Dr. Peter Chin-Hong said 25-50% of 75,000 patients involved in the Pfizer and Moderna trials experienced some side effects. Fifteen percent of them were more serious and needed more than a day to recover.
“It’s your body’s immune system trying to get activated because it’s seeing this new thing and the way that it gets activated is the way you’re feeling which is inflammation,” Chin-Hong said. “The virus is not in the vaccine, this vaccine is completely infection-free.””
I mean, I’m even starting to get angry at Alan for pretending any of their shit shouldn’t be destroyed.
Reply
Richard Noakes
| #
My “companion is “Ancient” she is 75!! – I am 6 months younger than her and I’m still a kid!!
Vaccines are death shots for both of us!!
FORMER PFIZER EMPLOYEE CONFIRMS POISON GRAPHENE OXIDE IN VAXXXINE
Karen Kingston, former Pfizer employee, confirms covid vaxxxines are poison.
Nice of her to bring some science, to the growing pile of bodies.
DEADLY SHOTS! Former Pfizer Employee Confirms Poison in COVID ‘Vaccine’ (rumble.com)
Transcript of the interview:
Stew Peters: “Well we have gone back and forth with fact-checkers – some independent researchers who have attempted to debunk the findings of Spanish researchers called La Quinta Columna, originally broken here on the Stew Peters Show by Dr. Jane Ruby. That video revealing that graphene oxide, a toxic substance – a poison! was found in the Pfizer vaccines. Those researchers later found that the same applied to Moderna and AstraZeneca, is now being tested as a result of our reporting. The truth is here.
USA Today and Lead Stories, all funded by the cabal, were all over me, all over Dr. Jane Ruby, and out and out calling us liars for reporting those findings to the world in a video that has now soared over well I think about a million views on Rumble.
We have sought the input of many medical experts, world-renowned doctors, Dr. Jane Ruby, Dr. Tenpenny, Dr. Judy Mikovitz, Dr. David Martin, they have all confirmed that report. But despite all of that confirmation, the assaults on our truth continue.
On twitter, you may have recently been following the hashtag ‘pfizerleak’ [#pfizerleak]. We want to know what’s in them. We want to know if it was pre-planned. Who’s behind all of it. We want to know what to believe, so today we’re going to get the confirmation that we need.
It’s hard to fact-check documents. It’s hard to fact-check publicly discoverable propriotary ingredients. It’s hard to fact-check Karen Kingston. She is a former Pfizer employee, currently an analyst for the pharmaceutical and medical device industries.
Karen, thank you so much for being here. We really appreciate your bravery. We admire your desire to expose the truth behind what appears to be, to me at least, one of the most, if not THE most, evil agenda mankind has ever been subject to.”
Karen Kingston @1:50: “Well, thank you for giving me a platform to share my findings and to spread the truth. And you’re right, it is extremely difficult to find this information and link it together. I do have a unique set of skills, this is what I do in the industry; I analyse intellectual property, the legal landscape, for both physicians, pharma and consumers, and then I’m also a scientific writer and do the clinical analysis as well. So you can’t expect everyone to have that skill set to find this information, and the truth is I’m – you know, the whole do your own research was born out of the reality that the mainstream media has been lying to us and big tech and social media have been blocking the truth. And that’s why people have had to do their own research.
And that’s – that violates our first amendment.”
SP: “Is graphene oxide in these shots?”
KK: “100% it is, and it’s irrefutable.”
Stew Peters @2:38: “So, just lay it out there. Is graphene oxide in these shots?”
Karen Kingston: “100% it is, and it’s irrefutable. And I’ll walk you through it.
So, what’s really important to know is that all of the mRNA vaccines contain what’s called a PEGylated lipid nanoparticle. And that’s what we’re going to go through. So if you take a look at the Moderna patent, it says, right there, that this contains lipid nanoparticle formulation. And as you go through the patent, which I’ll show you, they specifically talk about various ingredients and various PEGylated formulations that have alpha-numeric codes. And then you can also find them in the filings with the FDA with the IND [investigational new drug] and phase 3 trials for both Moderna and Pfizer. And you can also find them, you know, across the pond with the UK filings. I hope that’s making sense so far.
So here’s the important thing about the patent. I read the patent; it’s 193 pages plus attachments. And I read the patent to look for graphene oxide. It is not listed in the patent because it is a trade secret. So remember Bill Gates saying that there was a trade secret? Trade secrets are not, you know, privy to the public, so they cannot be in the patent. So graphene oxide is not listed in the patent, and it lists everything BUT that. But I’m still going to show you evidence that these contain graphene oxide and the patent in China that shows they contain graphene oxide.”
Stew Peters: “So let me just ask you, why would they put every other ingredient on the patent, with the exception of the standalone, graphene oxide? Why would they not put that on there?”
Karen Kingston: “I would say the number one reason is because it’s poisonous to humans and well-known that it’s poisonous to humans.
Yeah, and the other reason is because it is the main ingredient in hydrogel, which is the liquid, you know, AI template that’s used for some of Elon Musk’s, you know, research and Bill Gates, as far as that creating an interface between humans and, you know, the internet, if you will.”
Stew Peters: “So there is a legitimate theory that these shots are actually designed to create some sort of connectivity between humans, 5G – whatever this is, controlling your thoughts, your memories, all of these things, I mean, those are realistic and plausible possibilities?”
Theory: Humans as guinea pigs | Injecting people with as much graphene oxide as possible before they die.
Karen Kingston @4:56: “That’s not possible with this round. They rushed this thing out. They’re just seeing, you know, how much they can put into people before they die, I think, honestly.”
Stew Peters: “So this is a dose finding study? Basically a live dose finding study, and those that are dying or multiple sclerosis, Guillan-Barre, these tremors, the magnetism, all these things – “
Karen Kingston: “Well remember, we’re supposed to get boosters every 6 months. So we’re gonna get graphene oxide boosters every 6 months, to see how much we can build up in the system. We’ll go through this, because when you see the nations that are being injected, we’re the guinea pigs, you know, and so once they perfect this technology, I think there’s a second plan. I actually am not super comfortable talking about this stuff, because I don’t like to, you know, opinions on things, you know, and hypothesize, so I’d rather just stick to the data, if that’s okay.
So if you take a look at chemical and engineering news, there is these non peer-reviewed journals, we call them RAGS in the industry, every industry has it. And it’s basically, you know, the whales of the industry, the who’s who, and they just kind of brag about what they’re doing. So this article talks about the PEGylated lipid nanoparticles that are in all the COVID-19 vaccines. And there’s 4 lipids. And I’ll go over this.
So the first lipid is cholesterol, and that’s, our body loves cholesterol, it makes it go through the blood. Then there’s a phospholipid; the phospholipid adheres to the cell membrane, so that allows permeability to enter the cell membrane. There’s an ionizable lipid, so that gives it a positive ionic charge to help penetrate the mRNA to get into the cell. And then there’s the PEGylated lipid.
And so the reason why they created these is because mRNA is very unstable. Whether it’s synthetic or zoonic, which means it’s from an animal, you know, or a human. It’s very unstable. 80 degree weather kills it. Sunlight kills it. If you breathe on it, it dies. I mean, and researchers all say this.
It’s just – it rarely gets past the nasopharynx area of any healthy individual. It just – you know, your saliva kills it. It cannot survive on its own, so it needed this kind of biosphere that they created for it. And that’s why we have these four lipids and then they put the graphene oxide.
Now what’s interesting about the graphene oxide is that it’s 4,000 times stronger than titanium, and can withstand seventeen hundred degree fahrenheit temperature. So we took this very unstable virus, single helix virus, and we made it indestructible. Or “we”… they made it indestructible. So the PEGylated lipids, if you take a look, it’s ‘peg’: PEG, they’re made by a company called SINOPEG, which is [SINOPEG], and they’re located in China.
Now, how did I find this out? Well if you take a look at the Pfizer EUA filing, they list the 4 lipids – they have 2 lipids, each of which have 4 lipids of them in there, and so does Moderna. And Moderna’s is called – it’s called a Material Safety Data Sheet, this is what they use in industrial products. And it has a cast number, and there’s is SM102 for Moderna; and then if you go to Pfizer’s filing with the UK, the number – the 2 lipids that are in there, are called ALC0315 and ALC0159.
So, when I googled MSDS cast, don’t ask how I know all this information, and I put in some of those numbers, I found SINOPEG. I didn’t find SINOPEG by googling SINOPEG. I literally put in the MSDS number. And so if you go to the website, you’ll see the, you know, extremely long, like I don’t know, hundred alpha-numeric name of each of these lipids. And you’ll see it under a tab called COVID-19 Excipients. And it says ‘polyethylene glycol PEG 2000’, right? And then here you’ll see it’s ALC0159, and this company is located in China. And then if you pull from the patent, from the Moderna patent, it lists out all the different polyethylene glycol 200, PEG 200, PEG 2,000, and you will find those listed under the COVID-19 Excipients in SINOPEG.
So… it’s right there. It’s manufactured in China. And so, there’s other vaccines that are mRNA vaccines that are not being sold in the United States. You can find those excipients here too, by the cast number, the Material Safety Data Sheet cast number. Graphene oxide as a conductor of electricity | “positive charge annihilates anything that it comes in contact with”
Karen Kingston @9:15: And so if you want to know what is graphene, you know, what they explain here on SINOPEG, is, it is the ‘core-shell structure polyethylene glycol functionalized graphene for energy-storage polymer dielectrics: combined mechanical and dielectric performances’.
So what that means is that graphene is a conductor – it can be a conductor of electricity. If it has a positive charge, and this is in all the – some of the studies from the NIH and Moderna and stuff, if graphene gets a positive charge, it annihilates anything that it comes in contact with. Right now they’re not charged. They’re neutralized.
You know, well like, how does a positive charge get into the cell? That’s that other lipid. That ionizable lipid that gives it the positive charge for cell penetration. But these currently are not – they’re neutral, they have a neutral field. But if they are, if there’s an electrical magnetic field that activates a positive charge, potentially there’ll be damage and potentially death, depending on where these nanoparticles ended up in people’s bodies and how much of them did.”
Stew Peters: “So it’s apparent to me that they’re lying, to the world. (Karen Kingston: “Yeah.”) They’re trying to hide this; this is the secret ingredient. Lead Stories, USA Today, and all these other publications fact-checking this program, it appears to me that they are out and out lying. We’re going to get to who’s in on all of this in a minute, because I’m going to ask you, but, why are they using this graphene oxide? It’s a toxic substance, it’s poisonous. Why would – why are they using it?”
Karen Kingston: “Because it’s a great conductor of electricity and it can host magnetic field. So it can literally – it can connect you to the internet. That’s why.”
Stew Peters: “All right. I just wanted to make sure that I was clear on that. Because I know that you’re not comfortable opining opinions, things like that, but I just wanted to make sure factually that that’s what it can do, that’s what it’s capable of doing.”
Karen Kingston: “Yeah, and I mean, I haven’t had the chance, but I could probably go into some tech publications and AI publications, and we can find more information on how graphene oxide is a great electromagnetic – “ Graphene oxide is poisonous/toxic – Who’s responsible for it being in the vaccines?
Stew Peters @11:24: “Well the bottom line is that it’s poisonous. It’s poisonous
(Karen Kingston: “It is poisonous.”)
– it annihilates if it has a positive charge; it annihilates anything that it comes into contact with. It’s toxic for humans, it should not be in there and it is. That is what I needed to know. Who’s behind this? That’s what I’d like to know. Who’s behind all of this?”
Karen Kingston: “Well, I don’t… so, hold on, I didn’t put this in here but, there’s a company called Shanghai Nanotech, and they filed a patent, and you can – for graphene oxide for the use in COVID-19 excipients, and this is a meeting of them at their headquarters and that looks like, I think his name is Tal Zaks, the chief technology officer for Moderna, and if you go to the World Health Organization website, there is a page where they talk about how the global world needs to work together on these COVID-19 vaccines.
It’s from some time last year. And you’ll see the usual suspects there. You’ll see like Peter Daszak and the names from Moderna and several names from the NIH and NIAID, so… there is a large group of billionaires and millionaires, many many times over that have coordinated for the development and execution of these products.”
Stew Peters: “So you knowing this, you bringing this confirmation, why would the – I guess, I mean this is opinion, so you can just tell me if you’re not comfortable answering this, but I gotta ask, why would people like President Trump, Ron DeSantis, Sean Hannity, what do they have in – what stake in the game do they have? How do they not know this stuff? They have – I mean…”
Attempts to expose these vaccines as bioweapons are silenced/censored.
Karen Kingston @13:05: “No, there’s no way they can know this stuff. I want to be…[long pause], when I – sorry, when I found out, when I read this information, I didn’t know a woman could cry as hard as I cried. So I sent an email out on May 26th, to about 30 outlets with this information; I sent an email summarizing that these are bioweapons. I even spoke to – and I don’t mean to be disparaging to anybody, I even spoke to American Frontline Doctors and stuff and after I spoke to them, you know, some of the doctors still went on saying, “Oh, as long as you’re – if you’re under 30 you shouldn’t get the vaccine.”
And I called them up and I’m like, “What the hell are you doing? These are bioweapons.” They’re like, “We can’t say that.“ So the cognitive dissonance of the depravity and the evil of these “vacc” – injections, is very difficult for anyone to understand. And you have to also understand that for the whole year and a half these were being developed, anyone that came out and said, “Hey, this virus isn’t that bad”, they were mocked, they were ridiculed, they were ostracized, doctors were threatened to have their license taken away. So the truth couldn’t get out there. And then when people, anyone that was questioning about the speed for any of these vaccines to market, the need for them, even the FDA documents, they talk about “Hey, we don’t think someone under 18 should get these things. We’re worried about viral shedding.” If you show this like here – the manufacturing section of the application is redacted!
No one in good conscience should have approved this. But there is such brainwashing going on, such control of what basically the big tech wanted us to know as “the truth”, which was a bunch of lies, that it’s very difficult then for when someone says to you, “this is what’s going on”, to believe it.
I would compare it to anyone that’s been in a marriage where they had a spouse that was cheating on them. Your friends can tell you they’re cheating, there’s tons of evidence, but you are not going to believe it. You’re not going to believe all your trusted – all your trusted advisors have been telling you this stuff is safe, everything on the media says it’s safe, and then someone says “No. It’s actually lethal, and this is a planned, you know, planned genocide.” It’s impossible to believe.
Stew Peters: “Wow.”
Karen Kingston: “Does that make sense?”
Questioning people’s complicity with these agendas
Stew Peters @15:25: “Yeah, and, you know, I’m just, I’m having a hard time. I mean, honestly, I mean, I’m a human. You know. And so just knowing people that have subjected themselves to this inoculation; knowing how hard, how difficult it is to have a conversation with somebody, doing what I do, downloading to my brain, terabytes of information, every single day. Trying to determine what’s real, what’s not, what’s mis- and what’s dis-information? Who’s deep state, who’s trying to throw me off, who’s controlled opposition?
You know, I mean it really – it happens. It sounds like some kind of a sci-fi movie, but you’re living in it, so you understand. I’m just trying to process all of this as you’re saying it. And I’m imagining, you know, people in the media. You know, I’m imagining, you know, people that they don’t understand that there are billions of lives at stake, or maybe they do, which makes it even worse. Because they’re complicit in this. They’re part of this – the carrying on of this.
And then, I think about everybody who’s going to be mandated; these shots. Um, listen, I’ve – Karen, I got an email this morning. I got an email this morning from a very concerned mother, of a young woman, who is going to be attending a Christian college in South Carolina. And they’re going to mandate this thing for her. 18 year old young woman with her entire life ahead of her. And she’s just one of millions of stories like this that are happening here in this country. What we’re doing to our young people. Poisoning them.
And so, then you got healthcare workers. I mean, I have a dozen emails in the last 48 hours from nurses, healthcare workers, doctors, people who are working at these facilities, in these clinics at these hospitals that are going to be mandated this. They don’t want to do it, they need help! And, you know, the DOJ is telling everybody that they can do this. The governors can mandate this, that businesses can mandate this. And so…” “There’s no benefit to your health when you get injected;
the only thing it can do is poison, harm and kill.”
Karen Kingston @17:15: “Well, the DOJ – just because someone says something, especially in this current administration, doesn’t make it true. Okay? The DOJ can say, “We recommend this is mandated. We’re saying that this is – we mandate these vaccines.” But I, you know, it’s a memo, I read the memo, okay? It’s a memo that was written by Dawn Johnsen. She’s the acting assistant attorney general to the president, saying that, under title code 21, section 564, you can – private companies and local governments can mandate the vaccines under Emergency Use Authorization.
Her interpretation is reckless, and it has no merit. So it’s just an opinion. It is not enforceable.
Period. You know. And on top of that, what’s happened with these vaccines, or these injections, these EUA injections, not only is all the campaign and the propaganda a bunch of lies to terrify people into getting injected, which is a violation of human rights in and of itself, on top of that, she doesn’t mention title code 21 in her memo, which is what this falls under, because they violated 4 other sections of that title code under drug safety: drug and vaccine safety.
They have, under section 502, it’s false and misleading labelling, because this thing is NOT a vaccine, there’s no benefit to your health when you get injected; the only thing it can do is poison, harm and kill. So there’s false and misleading l. It doesn’t tell you that it contains graphene oxide. Adulterated drugs and devices, it also violates section 501, which again, adulterated drugs and devices is if it includes a toxin, which is the graphene oxide.
It also violates section 312.23 under initial new drug application. So if you go through an IND, you have to prove safety in animals before you move on to humans. They signed a letter of intent for pregnant rats. If that doesn’t make you furious, and we’re injecting pregnant women? And under the IND it says that if there is shedding, if there is risk to people of child-bearing age, then you need to stop the trial.
We KNOW there is shedding. We KNOW there is risk to child-bearing age. And the FDA even talks about it in their protein therapy and oncolytic virus that treatments that shedding is a real thing and you need to do animal studies first, then you need to do phase 1 human studies, and if there is, you know, if there is shedding, then you need to come up with controlled measures so that you don’t infect the un-injected. Which is what’s going on right now. They also violate section 312.42, which is clinical research holds and request for modifications. So that says if any of these things, I said, there’s at least 3 dozen, you need to stop the trials.”
Difference between trials of the past, and the COVID injections
Stew Peters @20:08: “Trials have been stopped when 25 people die; when 6 beagle dogs die.”
Karen Kingston: “They were supposed to have stopped the trials when they did the mice study, and all the mice – 80% died in 24 hours, and the rest died by the end of the week. […] They should’ve stopped the trials – “
Stew Peters: “But there is no threshold here. Is there? I mean – that’s the bottom line. There is no threshold. It doesn’t matter how many people die, they will continue this incessant push, won’t they?”
Karen Kingston: “Until American people speak up, and say ‘Enough is enough. Stop it!’ They will keep pushing us until, you know, they basically wipe out America. And they’re going after the children. Which is what is so disheartening. There is a – there will be no posterity. There will be no America. You know, if people of child-bearing age become infertile, and then children are at most risk for having serious adverse events and death from these injections. I mean, just look at the myocarditis numbers. They’re 1 to 25,000 reported, we know that’s at least 10%, which would be 1 in 2500, and it’s probably more like 1 in 250, which would be 4% of children are getting – having decades taken off their life or dying.
By Derek Knauss August 6, 2021
Stew Peters: “I am up against a hard break. And I have to go. Will you come back on this program? Because, we are dedicated to the truth. You are a wealth of information, and I’ve got so many more questions that I would like to continue this conversation with you. Will you promise to come back? I mean, are you comfortable with doing that?”
Karen Kingston: “Oh yeah! No, I’d love to be on. If I’m not comfortable answering your question I’ll just say that I’m not comfortable answering the question. I’m okay with saying that.”
Stew Peters: “Yeah, because I mean I have so many more, and I know that there’s going to be pouring out of questions on my social media and my DMs and my proton-mail, ‘please ask her this’. And so I just want to reserve the future opportunity to have that conversation with you.”
Karen Kingston: “Absolutely. And I sent you a lot of the documents from the FDA website and the patent office and – “
Stew Peters: “We’re going to post all of those at stewpeters.tv. Karen Kingston, thank you so much.”
Karen Kingston: “Put it all up there. And, I do, I drafted letters to healthcare associations, and I’ve just been so busy, but obviously after talking to you I will finish those letters today, so that people can send them to their employer and they can send them to their school, they can send them to healthcare providers saying that, you know, I have the right to informed consent. I’m not saying it’s going to stop them from getting fired. But what will happen is eventually justice will prevail and our constitution always prevails, and you will have evidence that they can’t, they can’t plausibly deny that they didn’t know this information.”
Stew Peters: “I believe that to be a 100% true, and I appreciate your optimism because that is what I’m trying to hold on to here as well. Unbelievable. Thank you so much for being here. Really appreciate it. The Stew Peters Show continues in 60 seconds. Go nowhere.”
Stew Peters @22:51: “You know what this is, right? Number 2 pencil? Everybody’s got one. Everybody’s got – everybody remembers filling out tests- we should all be filling out our ballots with these number 2 pencils. That’s what we should be doing. But you know what’s in the tip of every number 2 pencil, right?
Lead! Put it on paper, it turns into graphene; that’s graphite, right? Lead! They want to inject you with lead. Lead is poisonous. Graphene oxide is poisonous. Graphite is poisonous. This is – they want to inject your children with lead!
‘Oh, but it’s just a little bit, Stew. It’s just a little bit. Don’t worry about it. Just a little – just a tiny little bit of lead.’ Remember when they wanted to inject the world with just a little tiny bit of mercury? It’s not going to – the point is, it’s not going to stop, unless you stop it. I stop it. Unless WE stop it. And you can. No matter what weight, no matter what muscle they come at you with; the federal government – blablabla, propaganda this –
No! They cannot mandate this. Mandates are NOT legal, not at work, not at school, nowhere! They are not legal; they cannot force you to inject yourself or your children with this poison! Please! Share that video everywhere. We have once again been vindicated.
So USA Today, Lead Stories, Politico, all these other people you – if you google Stew Peters and click on news, you’ll see right now, “No graphene oxide!” We showed it in the segment. What are they going to do? Redact? Retract? Correct? I don’t think so. Say ‘NO’. Do not allow them to do this to you or your kids.”
(end of transcript)
By Derek Knauss August 6, 2021
See: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/08/please-add-video-leading-israeli-health-official-vaccinated-account-95-severe-85-90-new-covid-hospitalizations-vaccine-effectiveness-really-fading-video/
Reply
sir_isO
| #
I can’t tell if you’re serious.
Good cop/bad cop? Devil’s advocate?
What about the 25-50% (obvious) adverse effects in the pre-trials? What about all the damage to younger people?
The vaccines are supposed to address a bullshit “problem”…by attacking people with toxins. There is no possible safety associated.
Reply
Alan
| #
Where is the evidence to support this? There are reports in VAERS but as I understand it none are thoroughly investigated and that can only be done by an autopsy. Evidence must support every claim and it is missing with a lot of Covid claims, including of course the claimed efficacy of the vaccines.
Reply
sir_isO
| #
Okay so it’s bad cop.
They’re not thoroughly investigated because from your “policing” policies you decided to not do autopsies and ignore the fundamentals, aside from that.
Reply
sir_isO
| #
Some cosmic relief…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4VMe94pCL4
RIP Mr Dunsworth.
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
Alan stated, “ … the trials to prove their long term safety …”
People do not realize that vaccines have NOT been tested (clinical trials) for their efficacy/effectiveness either. As no specimen (reference standard) of the virus is available, no treatment (including vaccines) can be developed or tested against the virus. This is a scientific fact which cannot be denied – period!
Reply
Alan
| #
I think there is a reference standard since the virus was created in a laboratory, probably at North Carolina University.
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
Remember, the virus does not exist in a lab or anywhere else! Hence, there is no reference standard.
Reply
sir_isO
| #
I used to code the sort of “collision detection” algorithms you’d find at UNC.
Reply
sir_isO
| #
Saeed, with 30 years of “research”, with fairly recent prototype animals trials resulting in significant damage, mostly death…considering it’s a conflated, misattributed set of symptoms assigned to an engineered construct, based on fundamental fraud…on a scale of none to zero, how would you rate the legitimacy?
Reply
cnash
| #
Vaccinated people continue to get COVID-19 & it’s Delta variant in record numbers.
Vaccinated people found to be 600% more likely to die from covid “variants” than unvaccinated people, June 22, 2021
Reply
cnash
| #
The history books will show that because it is the vaccination that is creating the variants… antibodies created by the vaccine forcing the virus to find another solution or die. This is how the variants such as Delta are created. These variants are a production and result of the vaccination.”
Reply
sir_isO
| #
“These variants are a production and result of the vaccination.”
Not only, masks, medications, stress, lack of sun, EMF, etc.
Reply
Tom O
| #
A quote from the article –
“If early treatments didn’t work at all, the toxicity of the current vaccines would only make sense for those over 30 (based data to date). ”
I tend to disagree with this statement. The data tends to show me that he’s off by a few decades or so. Current data suggests that it would only make sense to take the vaccines if you were over 130.
Realistically, if it is “toxic” for those under 30, what in hell would make that anything but more toxic for those over 30? I suggest that the only people that should take these shots are the dead people that voted in the last election. 😉
Reply
Tom
| #
You cannot prove that any vaccine or mRNA injection saves lives. You cannot prove that anyone who received an injection would not have died anyway. In any event, you are not saving lives, only postponing deaths. Albeit a week or 50 years. At some point , no vaccines or drugs matter.
The only concern for big Pharma, the CDC, FDA , gates and fauci is that everyone on the planet be injected with mRNA nano-particle poisons ASAP. This is so the profits can continue to roll in, the pharma company stocks will continue to gain value and stock options will become extremely profitable.
They also want all humans injected before the real carnage begins in a year or two. Pharma and fauci will force the FDA to approve these poisons without any further testing for safety or efficacy. That does not matter as we could see from the shoddy half-assed trials and the complete disregard for all injuries and deaths. There will be 2-3 injections every year with “adjusted” mRNA poisons that will never be tested before hand. This is why the drug companies are not in any way responsible for any damages done. They can do whatever they want and nobody is going to question anything. Therefore, it must become your responsibility to avoid the death injections at all costs.
Reply
Tom O
| #
Can’t agree. This is NOT about profit and stock value. If it was, you would not be killing off the people that are the source of your revenue. This can only have one possible purpose, judging by what has happened so far – population reduction. I would have considered transhumanism/control through constructs within the body if it wasn’t for the the number of deaths and the way the spike protein seems to migrate to sex organs, though all organs are invaded as well.
Yes, they are making huge profits at this time, but to say that selling 2,3,4, or even 5 shots to a dwindling population is more profitable than what you could get selling “jabs” over 40 years to even half of the world’s population isn’t likely.
Agreed. R%esist the shot at all costs, though your getting tranquilized and jabbed isn’t beyond their twisted minds. If their “kill shot” was a clean execution, it would help, but it appears to be purposed to make your life as miserable and painful as possible instead.
Reply
cnash
| #
(Since the focus today is on getting kids vaccinated, I ran the numbers in the VAERS database for 20-24 year olds and 25-29 year olds)
THE DATABASES HAVE BEEN HEAVILY MANIPULATED , THE CDC PURPOSELY DELETED MOST OF THE DEATHS .
But before they could delete all of them, I exported several VAERS reports to a secure thumb drive and then posted them for the world to consider HERE https://www.scribd.com/document/516783618/The-Vaccine-Adverse-Event-Reporting-System-VAERS-Copy-txt and HERE: https://www.scribd.com/document/516784711/The-Vaccine-Adverse-Event-Reporting-System-VAERS-3-txt
ALL (100%) of these attending physician reports to VAERS concerning “new COVID deaths” are in patients that have received these vaccines, no exceptions. ALL of these reports are “post-vaccine deaths.”(But that’s NOT how they are marked)
ALL of them have been marked by VAERS and the CDC as mere “COVID DEATHS” with none of them marked “vaccine deaths,” even though all of them happened “post-vaccine.”
Reply
Dr Melinda. R.
| #
Awesome! Thanks for preserving that info. Very bad that it is being manipulated.
Reply
dnomsed
| #
So, let me see if I can get my head around the logic of these so-called vaccines:
They inject into willing human subjects a toxic mix of chemicals, components of which have, historically caused death and destruction amongst laboratory animals, without any of the required safety trials for humans. They also have doses ranging from saline placebo’s, 25 units, 100 units, 250 units, injected randomly into these subjects, without their prior knowledge of received dosage.
They can now expect that these subjects will be fitter in dealing with the so-called sarcov2 virus, and limiting clinical symptoms of covid-19?
Seriously? Are you mad?
Reply
sir_isO
| #
Mad isn’t the word. Lunacy is something I can relate with, but also hatred and anger.
Just imagine their lives, get to spend the rest of EVERY possible incarnation in subservience. Their insecurity, their attacks on Eden. Tsk tsk. Eden is automatically more hostile than they can hope to be, and the more hostile they hope to be, the more hostile Eden is.
Reply