Theory of General Relativity Passes a Range of Precise Tests

Researchers have conducted a 16-year long experiment to challenge Einstein’s theory of general relativity. The international team looked to the stars — a pair of extreme stars called pulsars to be precise – through seven radio telescopes across the globe

More than 100 years after Albert Einstein presented his theory of gravity, scientists around the world continue their efforts to find flaws in general relativity. The observation of any deviation from General Relativity would constitute a major discovery that would open a window on new physics beyond our current theoretical understanding of the Universe.

The research team’s leader, Michael Kramer from the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy (MPIfR) in Bonn, Germany, says:

“We studied a system of compact stars that is an unrivaled laboratory to test gravity theories in the presence of very strong gravitational fields. To our delight we were able to test a cornerstone of Einstein’s theory, the energy carried by gravitational waves, with a precision that is 25 times better than with the Nobel-Prize winning Hulse-Taylor pulsar, and 1000 times better than currently possible with gravitational wave detectors.”

He explains that the observations are not only in agreement with the theory, “but we were also able to see effects that could not be studied before”.

Ingrid Stairs from the University of British Columbia at Vancouver gives an example:

“We follow the propagation of radio photons emitted from a cosmic lighthouse, a pulsar, and track their motion in the strong gravitational field of a companion pulsar. We see for the first time how the light is not only delayed due to a strong curvature of spacetime around the companion, but also that the light is deflected by a small angle of 0.04 degrees that we can detect. Never before has such an experiment been conducted at such a high spacetime curvature.”

Animation of the double pulsar system PSR J0737-3039 A/B and its line of sight from Earth. The system — consisting of two active radio pulsars — is “edge-on” as seen from Earth, which means that the inclination of the orbital plane relative to our line of sight is only about 0.6 degrees.

This cosmic laboratory known as the “Double Pulsar” was discovered by members of the team in 2003. It consists of two radio pulsars which orbit each other in just 147 min with velocities of about 1 million km/h. One pulsar is spinning very fast, about 44 times a second. The companion is young and has a rotation period of 2.8 seconds. It is their motion around each other which can be used as a near perfect gravity laboratory.

Dick Manchester from Australia’s national science agency, CSIRO, illustrates:

“Such fast orbital motion of compact objects like these — they are about 30 percent more massive than the Sun but only about 24 km across — allows us to test many different predictions of general relativity — seven in total!

Apart from gravitational waves, our precision allows us to probe the effects of light propagation, such as the so-called “Shapiro delay” and light-bending. We also measure the effect of “time dilation” that makes clocks run slower in gravitational fields.

We even need to take Einstein’s famous equation E = mc2 into account when considering the effect of the electromagnetic radiation emitted by the fast-spinning pulsar on the orbital motion. This radiation corresponds to a mass loss of 8 million tonnes per second! While this seems a lot, it is only a tiny fraction — 3 parts in a thousand billion billion(!) — of the mass of the pulsar per second.”

Animation of the measurement of the Shapiro time delay in the double pulsar. When a rapidly spinning pulsar orbits around the common center of mass, the emitted photons propagate along the curved spacetime of the trapped pulsar and are therefore delayed.

The researchers also measured — with a precision of 1 part in a million(!) — that the orbit changes its orientation, a relativistic effect also well known from the orbit of Mercury, but here 140,000 times stronger. They realized that at this level of precision they also need to consider the impact of the pulsar’s rotation on the surrounding spacetime, which is “dragged along” with the spinning pulsar.

Norbert Wex from the MPIfR, another main author of the study, explains: “Physicists call this the Lense-Thirring effect or frame-dragging. In our experiment it means that we need to consider the internal structure of a pulsar as a neutron star. Hence, our measurements allow us for the first time to use the precision tracking of the rotations of the neutron star, a technique that we call pulsar timing to provide constraints on the extension of a neutron star.”

The technique of pulsar timing was combined with careful interferometric measurements of the system to determine its distance with high resolution imaging, resulting in a value of 2400 light years with only eight percent error margin. Team member Adam fDeller, from Swinburne University in Australia and responsible for this part of the experiment, highlights:

“It is the combination of different complementary observing techniques that adds to the extreme value of the experiment. In the past similar studies were often hampered by the limited knowledge of the distance of such systems.”

This is not the case here, where in addition to pulsar timing and interferometry also the information gained from effects due to the interstellar medium were carefully taken into account. Bill Coles from the University of California San Diego agrees:

“We gathered all possible information on the system and we derived a perfectly consistent picture, involving physics from many different areas, such as nuclear physics, gravity, interstellar medium, plasma physics and more. This is quite extraordinary.”

“Our results are nicely complementary to other experimental studies which test gravity in other conditions or see different effects, like gravitational wave detectors or the Event Horizon Telescope. They also complement other pulsar experiments, like our timing experiment with the pulsar in a stellar triple system, which has provided an independent (and superb) test of the universality of free fall”, says Paulo Freire, also from MPIfR.

Michael Kramer concludes: “We have reached a level of precision that is unprecedented. Future experiments with even bigger telescopes can and will go still further. Our work has shown the way such experiments need to be conducted and which subtle effects now need to be taken into account. And, maybe, we will find a deviation from general relativity one day…”

See more here: scitechdaily.com

Header image: Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (1)

  • Avatar

    Ken Hughes

    |

    But of course they will prove the theory right, ………..because it IS right. They’re looking at the wrong aspect of GR if they’re trying to find the connection with QM. GR is correct and accurate at the macro scale but physicists wonder why it “breaks down” at the small scale.

    This is because time is cyclical, a wave of energy, the energy that powers all events, all interactions. That’s why time slows, (red shifts), and loses energy, when some of its energy must be used to power the energy of particles, of a large mass.

    The energy in the vacuum (the energy of time), is huge according to quantum theory, but miniscule for observation. This is known as the “Vacuum Catastrophe” which has not yet been resolved.

    If time, (the energy that we experience as time), is quantised, (and it must be), then each Plank time must follow in sequence, one at a time. The next question is, “What happens BETWEEN each quanta?” There must be something there to provide continuity and to prevent the universe having to restart at each successive Planck time. The answer becomes obvious if you think about it long enough – There must be another, (negative), Planck time that exists BETWEEN our positive Planck times, A negative set between the Planck times in the positive set.

    But time is wavelike I said. Well yes, it does have to be both wavelike and quantum like, so how can this be?

    There is only one answer to this question – each set of Planck times, (energy quanta), must vary cyclically, with the positive set cycling between zero and one Planck time, whilst the negative set varies between one Planck time and zero. This produces two waves of energy, out of phase by 180 degrees, such that the energy value of the pair is always zero for all instances over the waves.

    The net energy of these waves, i.e. the net energy of the vacuum, is therefore zero,………almost. Think about the quanta in each wave. One wave has to lead or lag the other and so the energy sum of the two waves, is not quite zero, but almost zero, a value of one Planck time per cycle of the wave(s). This solves the “Vacuum Catastrophe”. it shows why quantum theory calculates a vast amount of energy in the vacuum, i.e. the energy of one wave, but why in practice, this energy is almost completely cancelled by the opposite, negative wave, giving the tiny value of vacuum energy we observe in practice.

    The thing is with General Relativity, it only applies at large, (slow) scales greater than one wave cycle. For events faster the this, events that complete within less than one wave cycle, GR can no longer predict what will happen when.

    This single wave cycle is the dividing line between the classical realm and the quantum realm, the “curtain” that hides events from the mathematics of GR.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via