Time To Repeal Newton’s Laws Of Motion?
Actually, it’s way past time. In the 1600s Newton developed his laws of motion from the work of Copernicus, Galileo, and Kepler. This was the beginning of science as a separate branch of philosophy
Copernicus had created science when he proposed that the sun was the center of the universe, not the Earth despite the obvious evidence.
The movement of the planets (Greek for wanderers) did not conform to the behavior of the rest of the stars in the sky and Copernicus though there must be a reason for this, what with the regularity of their movements.
The position of the stars and planets were well known for thousands of years creating constellations but Copernicus added reason to data and said that by having the sun at the center of the universe and the Earth just another planet orbiting the sun, the movement of the stars would all make sense.
Science is not just observation or data it is trying to discover what’s behind the evidence.
The invention of the telescope confirmed that the planets were indeed different from the other stars and even the stars were not as they appeared to be. Astrology was converted into astronomy with galaxies, where stars were grouped together by nature, replaced constellations, which were a result of perspective, not association.
Galileo then created the science of Physics by using experimentation to confirm beliefs by observations of reality. Using inclined planes he determined all objects fell at the same rate, regardless of their masses and for demonstrating this, he was arrested for heresy by the experts who held Aristotle as the authority of reality.
The telescope provided a much more accurate observation of the movements of the planets around the sun and Kepler used the observations by Brahe to develop his laws of orbiting objects:
1: The planets orbit is a non-circular ellipse with a single focal point,
2: The orbits of all the planets follow the equation of the velocity of the planet squared time the distance from the sun gives the same value for all the planets, C=dv^2.
3: In the same unit of time the movement of a planet will produce a pie slice of equal area.
Since an ellipse with a single focal point is a circle and the planets’ orbits are not circular, it shows that the single focal point is producing two forces with different strengths and actions.
The stronger attractive force between the sun and planets is the force of energy, which is attracted to positive matter and also holds the nucleus of the atom together. The repelling force is from the electrons, displaced from protons by the energy force, thus creating atoms with unbalanced charges.
The difference in distance of the charges in the atom mean that the negative radiated force from the orbiting electrons will be stronger than the radiated positive force coming from the protons in the nucleus.
So despite the atom contains the same number or electrons and protons, and those having charges of equal strength, the two electric forces radiated by the atom have different strengths.
Newton used his laws of motion with Galileo and Kepler’s laws to create his Law of gravity: g=G(M1M2)/d^2. This law is shown to be false by the very data used to create it. A planet traveling in a non circular elliptical orbit will have both its velocity and the distance to the sun continuously changing.
At the apogee of the orbit the planet it will begin to move closer to the sun and its velocity will begin to increase. When the planet reaches the perigee its velocity will begin to decrease and it will move further from the sun.
This shows that the attractive force between the sun and a planet is greatest when the distance between them is greatest while the repelling electric force becomes stronger when the distance between them is at a minimum.
The evidence shows that the reality is the exact opposite of what Newton’s law predicts.
As technology and theory have improved both the results of experiment by Galileo and Kepler’s second law have remained valid, which means the error in Newton’s Law of Gravity lies in the premises he used in developing it, not the data.
The concept of energy we have today was not known in Newton’s time, when energy was believed to be visible light and there needed to be a visible source of matter producing that light/energy.
This is why Newton included mass in his formula, even though Kepler’s law of orbits and the experiments by Galileo determining the rate of falling objects, showed these actions were not a result of mass.
When the laws of thermodynamics were accepted as basic truths of the universe Newtonian physics was shown to be wrong, but instead of abandoning what was thought to be true, they began to modify reality to preserve their beliefs.
The advances made by Newton should have become part of the history of science, not part of current science.
The first law of thermodynamics states that matter and energy cannot be created or destroyed and that all matter absorbs radiated energy and in turn radiates energy. Energy is attracted to mass and will be distributed equally to all the positive mass within the matter.
This means that energy is acting on the nucleus of an atom and is also being radiated from the nucleus.
The spectrum of light emitted by different elements is a result of electrons surrounding the nucleus interfering with the flow of energy being radiated from the nucleus.
Kepler’s second law shows that radiated energy (v^2) decreases with distance from the mass of the sun, There is not a different force of gravity for every object in the solar system, as Newton’s Law says, the objects in the solar system are equalizing with the level of energy being radiated from the sun.
The units of energy are distance squared divided by time units squared (d^2/t^2). This is how energy is measured not the composition of energy. When energy changes it doesn’t mean that distance, time, or mass change.
The units for tightening bolts with a wrench are distance times weight. As the torque changes neither the length or weight of the bolt or wrench changes.
When a satellite is orbiting a planet, it is equalizing with the level of energy being radiated by the planet, making the planet and its satellites one unit within the solar system. All satellites, at the same distance from the Earth, will complete an orbit in the same amount of time, regardless of differences in their masses.
The Earth is absorbing energy from and radiating energy into the energy field radiated by the sun. Since energy flows in a circular path, energy is not lost by the sun or gained by the sun as the Earth absorbs and radiates energy.
What we detect as a gain or loss of energy is a change in the density of the energy field that surrounds us.
The word equalization is a not an appropriate term for what is occurring when energy is radiated and absorbed, since the energy levels of satellites are never equal to the source energy.
A better term is stasis which is when the amount of energy reaching the object and being absorbed by it, is equal to the amount of energy being radiated from the object. The level of the energy radiated is lower (longer wavelength) than the energy absorb so an object will continuously absorb energy from a source.
There is an important difference between the level of energy and the density of energy.
The level of energy is the wavelengths of the energy being emitted while the amount of energy is the amplitude of that wave. The change of the wavelength (red shift, blue shift) is linear as the distance from a source of radiated energy increases of decreases, while the amplitude changes as the square of the distance as the area the energy spreads over increases or decreases.
Temperature recorded by a thermometer is not a measurement of the level of energy but of the density of energy being radiated.
If you have a natural gas furnace, the flame has a temperature of 3500 F. To raise the temperature of the room you can either burn more fuel or move the thermostat further away from the source.
Both actions will increase the temperature of the room by increasing the density of energy in the room, not by raising the level of energy of the flame heating it. No matter how close the thermometer is moved towards the flame or how much gas is burned, the temperature of the room can never exceed the level of 3500F.
Energy is motion when combined with matter but it also exists independent of matter, in energy fields (magnetic and gravity) which are radiated by objects. At first this radiated energy was identified as potential energy distinguishing it from kinetic energy but there is only the one energy and it, as well as matter, can only be detected when they combine to form objects that will radiate both an energy force and a matter force creating fields of influence by the object.
The forces of energy and matter act in opposite ways. When distance between opposite poles of magnets decreases, the strength of the radiated attractive force increases but when the distance between opposite charges decreases, the strength of the electric fields decreases. When the poles or charges are the same the opposite happens.
Energy will flow from matter in all directions until it encounters an energy field with an equal level of energy, radiating from another source of matter. At this equilibrium point the flow of energy will be redirected (energy is motion and never stops) as energy can only flow to a lower level of energy.
When a field’s flow is blocked by the field of another object, if the source field has a stronger strength (amplitude), it will cause the blocking object to move, converting radiated energy into kinetic energy.
That energy only flows from a higher level to a lower level is the second law of thermodynamics. People interpret this to mean that a cold object cannot increase the energy of a hot object but temperature is a measurement of the amount of energy, not the level of energy.
The Law of Conservation of Momentum shows that in an elastic collision, when there is no transfer of matter, an object with a higher level of energy but less kinetic energy, can add energy to an object with a larger amount of kinetic energy. The 2nd Law of thermodynamics should state that energy flow from an object with a higher level of energy per unit mass to an object with a lower level of energy per unit mass.
The acceptance that the universe consisted of both matter and energy and that these two components could not be created or destroyed should have led to the realization that the premises Newton used to create his law of gravity were wrong.
Instead of seeking new explanation for the evidence, excuses were created to preserve the existing beliefs and maintain the aura of expertise. Experts know the answer to all the questions, while scientists question all they know.
Newton’s first Law of Motion states that an object at rest will remain at rest unless a force is applied to it and when it is in motion, the object will travel at a constant speed in a straight line, moving in the direction of the energy flow, unless another force causes change. This is completely false.
Objects always absorb and radiate energy. If an object appears to be at rest it is because the mass has achieved stasis with the energy field it is in, below the level of the energy field.
Motion occurs when the level of energy of the object is equal to the level of the energy field. When the distance to the energy source changes, the object is no longer at equilibrium and it will gain or lose energy to re-establish stasis.
We see this in the orbits of satellites where the addition of energy causes it to lose energy and slow. In order for an object to travel in a straight line it must gain or lose energy.
Objects are determined by energy fields and their size is determined by that field, not their mass. The Earth and moon are one unit orbiting in the sun’s energy field and the solar system, with all its planets and matter, is a single unit orbiting in a galaxy.
When matter achieves stasis at the level of the source energy field but the amount of energy the matter contains (amplitude) is less than that of the energy field, it will become encapsulated by the source field and a part of that objects unit, absorbing and radiating energy to the same field.
There are no straight lines in the universe. Energy causes matter, with its radiated electric field, to move perpendicular to the flow of energy (north and south) resulting in the matter converging where the two flows of energy are equal, in an equatorial plane.
We see this with the rings around planets, the planets in the solar system, and the solar systems in the galaxies so it is also true with the atoms where the electric and energy forces originate.
A third constant force, pi, in turn forces energy to move perpendicular to it, resulting in objects, like planets and solar systems, to travel in arcs, forming orbits the size of which depend on the strength of the energy force (r). A sphere is a three dimensional object with only one dimension, r.
The level of both the energy and electric forces will decline with distance from their source, while their strengths (amplitude) will decline as the square of the distance. If the electric force is represented by a vector with a length of 1 and the stronger energy force is a vector of psi (1.61…), at an angle of approximately 38 degrees the length of the vector where their strengths become equal would be pi (3.141). (Wisenox) The universe is composed of nested spherical units, where there are no straight lines.
Newton’s second law states that the force/work producing an objects motion is equal to the mass of the object times the acceleration of the object. It is possible to do a lot of work without anything moving, much less accelerating.
Work is an expenditure or transfer of energy and an object accelerates because it is gaining energy from a source with more energy. Only part of the added energy causes the object’s motion, as the rest causes an increase in both its level of energy and the amount of energy being radiated by the object.
The amount of energy objects contain is a function of their mass or volume while the amount they absorb or radiate is a function of their area, half the area gaining energy and half losing energy.
At stasis, when the level of energy of the object becomes equal to that of the field, acceleration becomes constant velocity.
This F=ma led to the mistaken formula for kinetic energy ke=1/2mv^2. For this formula to be true, either the energy must only be distributed to half of the mass (volume) or the level of the energy acting on the mass must stop being absorbed when it reaches half the level of energy arriving from the source.
Newton’s 2nd law led to experiments of dropping weights from different heights into clay, then measuring the depth of the indentation and interpreting that data to show E=mV^2.
Where did the units of mass disappear to? Newton created is gravitational constant, G, with nonsensical units in order to have both sides of the equation have the same units, why not here? This experiment is determining the kinetic energy of the weights not their energy.
Doing the experiment using 2 spheres of the same size but different masses, after dropping them from the same height, the result would show the indentation from the sphere with greater mass being deeper than the sphere with less mass, even though their velocities and therefore energy were equal (Galileo’s law). The level of energy is indicated by the velocity while the amount of energy is a function of the mass.
The Law of Conservation of Momentum (M1V1 + M2V2 = M1V3 + M2V4) should be rewritten to a Law of Conservation of Kinetic Energy.
When Einstein made the ridiculous assertion that the speed of light is constant and at a maximum in a vacuum, physics accepted that E=mc^2 (again ignoring the units of mass) and became completely divorced from reality. Light is energy being radiated from a source and energy decreases as the distance to the source increase.
The discovery of the spectral shift of light emitted from atoms in distant stars showed that light is a wave, never a particle, and its speed changes as the energy and matter fields it propagated in changes. This is why the spectral lines blur as wavelengths become longer and shorter as the light travels through multiple decreasing and increasing radiated fields.
Einstein’s creation of the photon was just a labeling of the ignorance of the nature of light, wave or particle, and pretending it was knowledge. A particle with no mass is self contradictory and defies both reason and evidence.
If light had a particle nature and was affected by gravity, as Einstein claimed, the speed and energy of light would be slowest when it was emitted from the sun and increase as the sun’s gravitational field decreased.
Light is a change of the level of energy in the energy field radiated from an object and this change produces a change in the electric field creating an electromagnetic wave.
When this disturbance in levels reaches stasis point between the object and the fields being emitted from another object, it causes that stasis distance to shift and this transmits the disturbance to the energy field of the other object.
As the level of energy in this new energy field increases the speed of the disturbance/light will increase as it is moving towards the source. Newton’s third law of motion states that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
The absorption of radiated energy by matter in no way affects the source of radiated energy. Your gaining of heat from the sun does not cause the sun to cool.
When physicists accept that 95 percent of the universe is invisible, that reason does not apply to reality, and that an experiment knows if it is being observed and changes behavior when observed, they have lost all connection to reality and become a cult of science fiction.
Please note: PSI does not necessarily endorse the views of each and every article we publish. Our intention is to encourage open, honest, scientific debate.