Pfizer’s Own Documents: Stay Away From The Vaxxed

Pfizer’s own documents state both inhalation and skin contact will transmit whatever is in the vaccines from the vaccinated to the un-vaccinated.

Here is what just this small portion of this Pfizer document is saying:

  1. If a man who was not vaccinated touches a vaccinated woman, or breathes any of the air she breathes, (in other words, walks by her in the office) and he then has sex with his wife, his wife can have an adverse event and she should avoid having children.

  2. If a woman who was never vaccinated gets exposed to a woman who was vaccinated, she can:

A: miscarry,
B: spontaneously abort,
C. poison a baby via her breast milk
D: have babies that have cognitive difficulties.

This is universal, and very bad. Here is a small section of text I translated to English:

8.3.5.3. Occupational Exposure

An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with a vaccine test subject, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an adverse event. These people may include health care providers, family members, and other people who are around the trial participant.

When such exposures happen, the investigator must report them to Pfizer saftey within 24 hours of becoming aware of when they happened, regardless of whether or not there is an associated secondary adverse event. This must be reported using the vaccine secondary adverse event report form. SINCE THE INFORMATION DOES NOT PERTAIN TO A PARTICIPANT INVOLVED IN THE STUDY, THE INFORMATION WILL BE KEPT SEPARATE FROM THE STUDY.

TO CLARIFY: Vaccine study participants become super spreaders of something, they don’t say what it is, but it triggers secondary adverse events in people that never had the vax, when they are exposed to people who did have the vax.

THIS IS SO BAD that right here, in this little bit of quoted text, it warns that un-vaccinated men who have been exposed to a woman who was vaxxed will then pass whatever is in the vax to another woman.

Even the relatively small portion of the document I have put below here says the vax triggers spontaneous abortions and reproductive problems when un-vaccinated people are exposed to the vaccinated and that breast milk from a vaccinated mom can harm the infant. And if anyone does not believe it, then click the link above and wade through that enormous and intentionally confusing document. It’s for real folks, the vax is indeed the kill shot.

Do not permit the vaccinated to come anywhere near you, it is now official.

Here is a small portion of this huge document, straight from pfizer:

Terms:

Study intervention – A vaccine test subject.
AE – Adverse event in someone who got the vax.
SAE: An adverse event in someone who was exposed to someone who got the vax.
EDP: Exposure during pregnancy

8.3.5. Exposure During Pregnancy or Breastfeeding, and Occupational Exposure Exposure to the study intervention under study during pregnancy or breastfeeding and occupational exposure are reportable to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of investigator awareness.

8.3.5.1. Exposure During Pregnancy An EDP occurs if:

* A female participant is found to be pregnant while receiving or after discontinuing study intervention.

* A male participant who is receiving or has discontinued study intervention exposes a female partner prior to or around the time of conception.

* A female is found to be pregnant while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention due to environmental exposure. Below are examples of environmental exposure during pregnancy:

* A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.

* A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.

If this vax is not shedding into other people, why would contact between vaccinated and un-vaccinated be an event worth noting?

If this vax is not shedding, then WHY does a guy who has been around a vaccinated woman, even if he did not touch her or have sex, need to worry about getting a different woman pregnant?

That’s not all, the following is detailed, and far worse.

The investigator must report EDP to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred. The initial information submitted should include the anticipated date of delivery (see below for information related to termination of pregnancy).

* If EDP occurs in a participant or a participant’s partner, the investigator must report this information to Pfizer Safety on the Vaccine SAE Report Form and an EDP Supplemental Form, regardless of whether an SAE has occurred. Details of the pregnancy will be collected after the start of study intervention and until 6 months after the last dose of study intervention.

* If EDP occurs in the setting of environmental exposure, the investigator must report information to Pfizer Safety using the Vaccine SAE Report Form and EDP Supplemental Form. Since the exposure information does not pertain to the participant enrolled in the study, the information is not recorded on a CRF; however, a copy of the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator site file. Follow-up is conducted to obtain general information on the pregnancy and its outcome for all EDP reports with an unknown outcome. The investigator will follow the pregnancy until completion (or until pregnancy termination) and notify Pfizer Safety of the outcome as a follow-up to the initial EDP Supplemental Form.

In the case of a live birth, the structural integrity of the neonate can be assessed at the time of birth. In the event of a termination, the reason(s) for termination should be specified and, if clinically possible, the structural integrity of the terminated fetus should be assessed by gross visual inspection (unless pre-procedure test findings are conclusive for a congenital anomaly and the findings are reported).

Abnormal pregnancy outcomes are considered SAEs. If the outcome of the pregnancy meets the criteria for an SAE (ie, ectopic pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, intrauterine fetal demise, neonatal death, or congenital anomaly), the investigator should follow the procedures for reporting SAEs. Additional information about pregnancy outcomes that are reported to Pfizer Safety as SAEs follows:

* Spontaneous abortion including miscarriage and missed abortion;

* Neonatal deaths that occur within 1 month of birth should be reported, without regard to causality, as SAEs. In addition, infant deaths after 1 month should be reported as SAEs when the investigator assesses the infant death as related or possibly related to exposure to the study intervention. Additional information regarding the EDP may be requested by the sponsor. Further follow-up of birth outcomes will be handled on a case-by-case basis (eg, follow-up on preterm infants to identify developmental delays).

In the case of paternal exposure, the investigator will provide the participant with the Pregnant Partner Release of Information Form to deliver to his partner. The investigator must document in the source documents that the participant was given the Pregnant Partner Release of Information Form to provide to his partner.

8.3.5.2. Exposure During Breastfeeding An exposure during breastfeeding occurs if:

* A female participant is found to be breastfeeding while receiving or after discontinuing study intervention.

* A female is found to be breastfeeding while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention (ie, environmental exposure). An example of environmental exposure during breastfeeding is a female family member or healthcare provider who reports that she is breastfeeding after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact. The investigator must report exposure during breastfeeding to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred.

The information must be reported using the Vaccine SAE Report Form. When exposure during breastfeeding occurs in the setting of environmental exposure, the exposure information does not pertain to the participant enrolled in the study, so the information is not recorded on a CRF. However, a copy of the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator site file.

An exposure during breastfeeding report is not created when a Pfizer drug specifically approved for use in breastfeeding women (eg, vitamins) is administered in accord with authorized use. However, if the infant experiences an SAE associated with such a drug, the SAE is reported together with the exposure during breastfeeding.

Here’s the clear part of this, that everyone can understand:

8.3.5.3. Occupational Exposure An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with the study intervention, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an AE. Such persons may include healthcare providers, family members, and other roles that are involved in the trial participant’s care. The investigator must report occupational exposure to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, regardless of whether there is an associated SAE. The information must be reported using the Vaccine SAE Report Form. Since the information does not pertain to a participant enrolled in the study, the information is not recorded on a CRF; however, a copy of the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator site file.

I WILL TRANSLATE THAT TO ENGLISH:

An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with a vaccine test subject, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an adverse event. These people may include health care providers, family members, and other people who are around the trial participant.

When such exposures happen, the investigator must report them to Pfizer saftey within 24 hours of becoming aware of when they happened, regardless of whether or not there is an associated secondary adverse event. This must be reported using the vaccine secondary adverse event report form. SINCE THE INFORMATION DOES NOT PERTAIN TO A PARTICIPANT INVOLVED IN THE STUDY, THE INFORMATION WILL BE KEPT SEPARATE FROM THE STUDY.

See more here: jamesfetzer.org

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (32)

  • Avatar

    sir_isO

    |

    Sorry, I don’t believe them.

    Imagine you are a corporation that relies on a fundamental fraud (that of contagion).

    I will however, avoid the vaccinated (because they are unreasonable) and I would suggest screening of blood.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      sir_isO

      |

      “An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with a vaccine test subject, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an adverse event.”

      Yeah that’s a typical environmental hazard, try bring a vaccine near me, get punched.

      Reply

      • Avatar

        sir_isO

        |

        Do you people understand what that means? Coz I don’t really.

        Let’s think about what it could mean (keeping in mind “vaccine test subject” is a rather vague term):
        1. Oh, you’re vaccinating “Off the books” but Pfizer reminded paid you for that and the extra “unofficial” data?
        3. Wait a minute

        Reply

      • Avatar

        sir_isO

        |

        Seriously, the only thing I can realistically think of causing those sort of issues in proximity to the vaccinated is mainly EMF related.

        They’re not breathing plutonium, hey.

        But the thing is, whether they are vaccinated or not is probably known. Their location is probably known (smartphone), they happen to have rather elevated EMF absorption.

        Now let’s say SMART really does mean Secretive Militarized Armaments, Residential Territories…

        Of course, in terms of efficiency you would rather target the more susceptible, right? Like those you can locate, beam shit at, have been vaccinated/damaged through that but ALSO now with more EMF associated damage?

        Or is my sociopathic train of thought not quite realistic enough?

        Reply

        • Avatar

          sir_isO

          |

          Hilariously, as I was reviewing what I typed after going to get some drugs (which I should do before I post a comment, tbh)…a song named Evoken – To feign ebullience start playing “randomly”.

          Reply

    • Avatar

      Howdy

      |

      Don’t believe it either. In this family, we don’t avoid kissing and hugging our “vaxxed” family members.

      It’s more divide and conquer.

      Reply

      • Avatar

        sir_isO

        |

        I’m different though, I don’t have “vaxxed” family.

        Reply

        • Avatar

          sir_isO

          |

          You know why? Because unfortunately, I know the tree of death a bit too well.

          When you perpetuate, support, promote that industrial anti-life garbage considering the damage it causes, your ignorance, even if you were my sister, you are not my sister.

          Reply

          • Avatar

            sir_isO

            |

            In more kinda abstract terms…

            That btw, is related to Isis succumbing to Seth’s suggestions.

            Or perhaps Isis influencing Seth’s suggestions. Go look at what Isis is kinda implicated with…

            That’s why I chose Kali instead.

          • Avatar

            Howdy

            |

            eh?
            I don’t do the world of shells, osiris.
            Isis and Kali: Same deity, different religion, different facet

          • Avatar

            sir_isO

            |

            “I don’t do the world of shells…”

            But yet, you associate with the dead…and/or shells known as the vaxxed?

            Shit, thinking about you suggesting Isis and Kali being the same, maybe the part missing is Diana. But hey, she’s dead too.

            Strange how I know Diana is Lilith is…etc. I’ve seen it.

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWB7pmmMa1g

            “There was no moon.”

            I dunno, any way I look at it, I can’t to incest.

            Yeah, I’ve learned by now to kinda reject that bastardized reflection.

            You remember that time Lucifer was all like “Nah…”?

          • Avatar

            Howdy

            |

            Isis and Kali are just names given to that which is not understood. That is why they are able to die in people’s minds .
            Lilith and Lucifer mean nothing to me.

            You say the vaxxed are dead? Indeed, I see nothing to accept that, nor do I feel it.

            The flock, those who did nothing wrong, need a shepherd, as they have done for a long time now. It is coming.

  • Avatar

    Carl

    |

    Everyone misses the obvious question: What should the unvaccinated do to strengthen their immune system (defenses) knowing there is a synthetic mobile contagion which is unavoidable and might cause a fatal dis-ease?

    Reply

    • Avatar

      yougottaloveme

      |

      Yes… that is our best line of defense. Here are things I take: Elderberry softgels, L-Lysine tabs, Magnesium Chloride tabs, Zinc tabs, Vitamins B, C, D and E, Ginger Root softgels, a Multivitamin, Magnesium Oxide tabs

      Reply

  • Avatar

    Howdy

    |

    If a woman who was never vaccinated gets exposed to a woman who was vaccinated, she can:
    A: miscarry,
    B: spontaneously abort,
    C. poison a baby via her breast milk
    D: have babies that have cognitive difficulties.

    Seems men are just carriers then, if only women suffer problems.
    But then again, this just says the “vax” is dangerous to the unborn full stop.

    I guess all pfizer personnel spend their whole lives now in space suits then.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    very old white guy

    |

    So, to simplify. I am an old man, can shedding give me the spike protein that has been brought into question? if not, then shedding to me would be harmless.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      sir_isO

      |

      It’s not a concern except for potentially blood transfusions.

      Remember, the spike protein itself is a product that is degraded by your body (because it’s toxic garbage). In a vaccinated person, that stuff is constantly produced by hijacking protein production. Those products won’t be able to affect you in the same way, and they are externalized so have a LOT of other defenses to go through first.

      Even the production of spike proteins in your body wanes with time and neutralizing/filtering factors, which is most likely why they want regular “booster” shots.

      The most obvious things to address the neutralization of spike proteins would be antioxidation factors, mitochondrial factors.

      Imo, don’t stress about it. Like any part of the narrative, it’s bullshit. The thing is, I do think vaccinated individuals are more targeted with EMF attacks…so that’s different. A bunch of vaccinated people with say, smartphones near you is a bit too “zombie aura”, if you know what I mean.

      Reply

    • Avatar

      sir_isO

      |

      Lemme put it this way.

      The vaccinated, their bodies continuously waste energy to produce unnecessary ONLY damaging toxic garbage. Trillions. Constantly, directly, in important organs, all over the body.

      Those vaccinated aren’t exactly instantly dying (most of the time), while they ignore and peddle enormous amounts of other toxic crap, try to amplify toxic effects, etc.

      Realistically, their “shedding” would be a miniscule fraction of what is constantly produced in their bodies and it has to deal with WAY more defenses, while not being the causative agent (the vaccine itself).

      Reply

    • Avatar

      sir_isO

      |

      Related to that is the framing of “antibodies” as a good thing. It really isn’t, if you’re exposed to toxic shit, antibodies result.

      With “immune response” framed as a “good thing”…what it actually means is “The body is responding to try and neutralize immediate damaging toxic factors”.

      In what sort of world, do you think cytokine, chemokine, inflammatory markers, wasting bodily energy, misdirection and diversion of function is good for your health and protection?

      It’s an awful lot like suggesting that if you get shot in the face for real, you’re going to be more protected against being shot in the face, you know, for real.

      Reply

  • Avatar

    NicaLeon

    |

    It wasn’t mentioned in the write up that the info came from the covid vaccine trial, because this type of info is usually mentioned in a trial of a live attenuated vaccine. Which the covid vaccine was not.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Viking Aussie

    |

    I have no idea what the article, or anyone else, is talking about.

    My brain is now definitely discombobulated. I think I will go back to bed.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Binra

      |

      There’s these so called vaccines being pushed out against all reason. Its more unreason. Until you can see past the payload, it is actively discombobulating by design.
      At least you are free to choose to go to bed, rather than no longer able to get out of it.

      Reply

  • Avatar

    Tom

    |

    What about anyone unvaxxed coming into contact with anyone vaxxed? This needs to be clarified. I would expect the vaxxed to shed some of their 40 trillion nano-particles that they are injected with by these mRNA poisons. I would never trust the pharma companies to tell us the full truth about any and all of the drug, vaccine and injection poisons they sell for profit only, not for making your healthier. There is simply no one to trust when it comes to modern stone age medicine.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Binra

      |

      If you trust that they are compelled to lie, you can look at what they say for what it reveals about them, and the agenda that drives them. Where you may have any back-door corresponding sympathies to the leverage used, and so update your education in discerning what is truly helpful, instead of being baited by ‘fake concerns’ set in fear.

      Reply

  • Avatar

    Andrew Pilkington

    |

    They are pushing through their Health Passports, so, is That because of This, or is This because of That? More Segregation and Discrimination from he Head F**ks at SAGE and Behavioural Sciences eitherway.
    Why give these freaks the thrill of seeing us trying to second guess them? More “Chaos”.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    MC

    |

    This was reported months, but thanks for the reminder.
    Sir isolated needs to get off the troll train, and stop harassing people.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      sir_isO

      |

      Excuse me, please reference where I actually harassed someone here.

      Reply

  • Avatar

    Binra

    |

    Did I miss the link to the actual document?
    Is there such a document?
    Is it intentional disinfo? (If it exists).

    What is the payload of the message?
    What is it suggesting or insinuated as a primer for reaction?
    Who benefits?

    Deceit is deeply laid.
    Much of the global financial-social-political system is invested in or captured by narrative deceits by regulatory contracts. This means that the stakes for the stakeholders are extreme and the resources that are called on are huge and even ‘well meaning’ but unaware of deeper agenda that effectively tools good intentions.

    We are bio-electo-magnetic in expression.
    The intent is to interject an interface of surveillance and control – not just in our financial and social transaction, but our biological status and function. This uses GoF nanoparticles which alter the ‘signalling’ of the magnetised – which is not just the presence of such particles of parasitic intent but their state of activation.
    Currently I see the above as diversionary, emotive, divisive and undermining of the qualities of being that are key to resilience and integrity – but great for acting out drama as if its your script and you are centre stage.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    sir_isO

    |

    Howdy,

    “The flock, those who did nothing wrong, need a shepherd, as they have done for a long time now. It is coming.”

    So let them choose a shepherd, what use is a shepherd if he tends to the welfare of the wolves?

    Reply

    • Avatar

      sir_isO

      |

      Sorry, I mean that as a reply to the “lucifer don’t mean nothin'” comment.

      “Those who did nothing wrong”…

      Gl with that. So as, for instance, a doctor, or a nurse, you’re sitting there injecting children with toxic shit, because you had a shepherd that told you… “Look, it’s fine, this stuff is good for them. If you don’t inject them with toxic shit it’s going to be your fault if they die, so that’s why you have to inject them with toxic shit, because you’re their shepherd.

      Btw, here’s $200 for every injection. Just remember to send that data to our shepherd organization.

      $400 and “Special Shepherd” status and privileges if you also protect your children with choice toxins. And remember, since you never even considered the justification, ingredients, functions, motivations… for more than, maybe 3 or 4 minutes…all you have to do is refer to the more authoritative shepherd’s suggestions about safety which you should never question, unless you forgot about the stick.”

      So what you have, is practically EVERY PARENT ON THIS PLANET, being a failed shepherd.

      Reply

      • Avatar

        sir_isO

        |

        So about shepherds, limbo, judgment and shit in realtime.

        Have you heard of Qafsiel?

        Let’s take a look at for instance, two egregious examples of Shepherds and how the process became the verdict:

        Mike Yeaden, sold degenerate toxic shit, based on fundamental fraud…for monetary profit…for a very long time. Now, he’s trying to peddle toxic shit by telling you about other toxic shit, which also relies on the same fundamental fraud, is bad…by supporting that fundamental fraud.

        Just imagine you spent 40 years selling toxic shit based on fraud, abusing people and now it’s known that it’s toxic shit abusing people. And now, you have to kinda try defuse that situation, but hey, since you’re optomistic and a psychopath you reckon that’s actually going to end well for you. That’s called denial.

        Anyway, Van Den Tosser, is probably even worse but more honest in a sense. He spent much of his time with toxifying animals, designing and selling shit like covid vaccines, he too…relies on perpetuating that fundamental fraud so that he can sell you his “good” toxic shit.

        There are some examples of what is paraded as shepherds, and shepherds that can never be.

        Reply

  • Avatar

    Howdy

    |

    Surely you know the shepherd I’m on about isn’t your regular human osiris?

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via