While it’s known that the COVID-19 virus can damage the lungs, it can be equally harmful to many other organs.

Behind Enemy Lines

By Justine Isernhinke

Head of Geopolitics and UAP Research, The Malone Institute www.maloneinstitute.org

In the film Behind Enemy Lines, Owen Wilson plays Lt. Chris Burnett who is stranded behind enemy lines in the former Yugoslavia when his fighter is shot out of the sky.

Scientists in China, experimenting with a coronavirus closely related to the virus that causes COVID-19, found that it had a 100 percent kill rate in a small mouse study, according to the researchers’ announcement on Jan. 4.

I need your help to collect this information. Nobody else seems to be asking the question – are even the unjabbed now at an increased risk of cancer? And is it from being near those who are jabbed?

Every American wants some authoritative entity to carry out investigations and stop actual terrorists. We want the FBI to operate as it was intended. Same can be said for the DOJ, health agencies, Congress, etc.

Starting in the mid-20th century, companies began distorting and manpulating science to favor specific commercial interests

I woke up this Tuesday morning and I had gained 300 followers overnight. I was baffled given my personalized algorithms are rigged for suppression. I dont have freedom of reach. UNLESS that is, someone with sway shares my content.

Vaccination during the third trimester of pregnancy is unprecedented and risky, since a vaccine induced fever could precipitate stillbirth or premature delivery of the baby. The CDC and the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex has told young mothers they should take the risk for theoretical protect of the newborn.

The number of UK consumers buying electric vehicles (EVs) fell for the first time last year, with the latest figures announced just as the government threatened manufacturers with hefty fines if they fail to meet minimum sales targets.

Dr. Anthony Fauci admitted during a 14-hour session of answering questions that he recommended vaccine requirements in schools and acknowledged that such mandates could increase the likelihood of people opting out of vaccination, according to lawmakers.

The US FDA repeatedly pulled monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 off the market because modeling studies demonstrated emerging mutational resistance. I wondered if the same challenges will exist for nirsevimab (Beyfortis, Sanofi, AstraZeneca) which have been injected in newborns on a mass indiscriminate basis since October, 2023 for the theoretical prevention of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).

A recent article at ABC News titled, “2023 was the year of record heat temperatures,” makes a slew of claims about global warming in 2023, including that extreme heat is becoming more common and more disastrous. These claims are misleading.

A study by Julia R. Andreasen and colleagues looked at the changes in ice shelves, Antarctic-wide, using MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) satellite data from 2009 to 2019.

The latest example of pointless virtue-signaling, intended to help ‘save the planet’, has shown itself to be inadequate for its intended role.

It is not surprising that various COVID-19 “vaccine” injury compensation schemes have arisen following the rollout of the jabs which have been reported to be associated with the highest rate and absolute number of serious adverse events worldwide compared to any “vaccine” product in history.

The allure of seamlessly blending modern, instrumental climate records with paleoclimate data obtained through proxies like tree rings and ice cores is undeniable. It promises a comprehensive view of Earth’s thermal history, stretching back millennia. However, before succumbing to this tempting shortcut, we must acknowledge its profound ethical and scientific challenges. This article delves into these challenges, arguing that splicing modern data onto proxies is, at best, dubious science and, at worst, a gross misrepresentation of Earth’s climatic past.