Recently, it has felt like we had reached a new dawn on energy and climate policy with energy Jedi winning the argument against the ‘net zero’ by 2050 target

This alarmist habit of treating something ephemeral as the “new normal,” and some old familiar peril as new and unprecedented, does not just extend to wildfires generally

 

Nearly every one aced the take-home midterm in Brown professor Roberto Serrano’s economics class. When he told students they’d have to take the final in person, many of the high scorers dropped the class.

Are Mandatory Vaccination Policies the beginning of the medical dictatorship that is warned about in this anonymous quote? The point is not whether Benjamin Rush made this statement but that the statement is true.

US Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan’s admission at a July Senate hearing raises troubling questions about accountability in judicial education.

Intermittent ‘renewable’ (solar and wind) electricity generation is a useful but niche technology, either for off-grid users or as a small portion of on-grid generation.

I have to hand it to the trio of “doctors” who wrote the peer-reviewed NEJM paper “Contextualizing the Dead Donor Rule in an Era of Voluntary Euthanasia“. They didn’t seek refuge in a hoary euphemism and instead called the cutting open a living person to steal his organs exactly what it is: “death by organ donation”

The French government has revealed that an estimated ninety percent of so-called wildfires are the result of human activity, undermining the persistent media narrative that ‘climate change’ is driving spontaneous fires ravaging the countryside

Polio—a word that conjures up images of children in leg braces and iron lungs, a disease we were told had one cause—a virus—and one solution—a vaccine. But does history support this narrative?

It’s a reasonable assumption that when people try to suppress free speech and inquiries by journalists, they may well have something to hide.

For nearly 40 years, the global warming cabal has spread fear and wasted resources on an emergency that doesn’t exist. While their influence has begun to wane, as their credibility has crashed and their lies have been exposed, the fabrications, exaggerations, and junk science continue. [some emphasis, links added]

A couple of weeks ago we were told by the media a recent spate of hot weather drownings were caused by ‘climate change’, as if people suddenly forgot how to swim because it was hot, now we get a professor claiming loneliness is caused by ‘climate change’

Britain’s “flagship” floating wind project just sold for £1. In 2022, TwinHub was hailed as a watershed moment for British floating wind.

Johnson & Johnson (J&J) has offered to pay as much as $5.5bn (£4.14bn) to resolve tens of thousands of lawsuits in the US alleging that its baby powder and other products containing talcum cause ovarian cancer

Chris Nemeth, a Melbourne father of two, received approximately AU$6.5 million ($4.5 million) in compensation after developing chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) following administration of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine in July 2021, according to a report from Children’s Health Defense [1]

The BBC just published ‘an investigation’ into the sale of fenbendazole and ivermectin as unproven cancer treatments. They spin a clear narrative: unlicensed drugs, dangerous sellers, and vulnerable patients being misled. The problem? It is a classic case of BBC lying by omission.