In case you thought the PCR test detects an actual virus…wrong

In a CDC document titled, “Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) 2020 Interim Case Definition, Approved April 5, 2020,” under the section, “Laboratory Criteria,” we have this: [1]

“Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ribonucleic acid (SARS-CoV-2 RNA) in a clinical specimen using a molecular amplification detection test.”

The test referred to is the PCR. And as you can plainly see, it is detecting, not the virus itself, but a piece of RNA.

A piece of RNA ASSUMED to come from the virus, SARS-CoV-2.

I say ASSUMED because, where is the actual virus? Where is the virus isolated from all surrounding material?

If you don’t have the virus, you can’t say, with any degree of certainty at all, that you have a piece of it (the RNA).

As I’ve described many times, “isolated” is a term that is tortured by researchers and public health officials, so that it means just the opposite of what it is supposed to mean. [2]

Numerous studies that claim the virus has been isolated actually turn out to mean: “We have the virus in a soup in a dish in the lab. The soup contains various types of animal and humans cells, toxic chemicals and drugs, and other genetic material. The virus is completely surrounded, but it is there. We know this, because some of the cells are dying, and this dying must be the result of infection with the virus…”

This argument not only turns the definition of “isolation” on its head, it reveals, upon a moment’s consideration, that the dying of the cells could come from the action of the toxic chemicals and drugs; and on top of that, the cells are being starved of nutrients, so they could be dying as a result of that deprivation.

Therefore, to say “the virus must be in the soup in the dish in the lab” because is killing cells…well, that’s completely unproven, and therefore…

There is no reason under the sun to claim that the virus is there in the soup at all.

Hence, the claim that the PCR test is detecting a piece of RNA from the virus is unwarranted. Because, again…where is the virus? Where is the truly isolated virus?

Nowhere.

And on that basis alone, the PCR test is irrelevant, useless, and deceptive.

It is set up to look for and detect a piece of RNA material that has never been proved to come from this un-isolated phantom ASSUMPTION, called “SARS-CoV-2.”

A few more moments of clear thought, and you realize the whole string of “science” that leads to the lockdowns and the economic devastation is not science at all.

It is what is called, in the intelligence community, a cover story. A story launched to justify crimes.

In this case, capital crimes against humanity.

SOURCES:

[1] https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nndss/conditions/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/case-definition/2020/

[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6-8VRGvNtQ “Conversations with Dr. Cowan and Friends Episode 12: Jon Rappoport” (Dec 17, 2020)

About Jon Rappoport: He is the author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALEDEXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe.

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.

 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (6)

  • Avatar

    Joseph Olson

    |

    Moderna, Pfizer and BioNTech injections for WuFlu contains polyethylene glycol, a petroleum based compound, normally used as automotive antifreeze, for those whose doctors recommend improved cold weather performance.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Stephen Reiss

    |

    I think I understand the reasoning put forward for why the virus has not been isolated.

    Will someone please explain what set of words and data are required to satisfy anyone, and everyone, that the virus has been isolated.

    I have done a deep dive into what I call the COVICON Pandemiscam and have satisfied myself regarding nearly all the issues involved. The issue of the isolation of the virus is one that I realize requires some extra help if I am to understand it without taking a lab course at college.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Doug Harrison

    |

    Stephen: You say that you understand why the virus has not been isolated. Surely you mean “how” as “why” is a much larger question. Kindest regards Doug

    Reply

  • Avatar

    George Affleck

    |

    I would like to know what the test is for the test. How do we know that any test is finding what we want it to find?

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Mark Tapley

    |

    The PCR test only shows protein particles that may be associated with some kind of corona (there are thousands). Inventor Kary Mullis (conveniently “died” right before the fake virus instigated) stated that it was of no diagnostic value. However if you have a fake virus then you need a fake test to verify it. Now all the barnyard animals on the Zionist plantations can run out and get the fake PCR test to find out gif then are sick. Now that the fake vaccine (like in the Swine flu fraud) is being deployed our wonderful medical workers will be instructed to cut the PCR cycles so that the fake vaccine appears to work. A similar scam was run with the polio scam many years ago and most goyim think that the vaccine (it was actually causing paralysis) was working.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via