Norway’s Faktisk ‘Fact Check’ Site Exposed in Scandalous COVID Lie

Written by John O'Sullivan on November 9, 2020. Posted in Current News

As Norway’s population wakes up to the biggest scam in medical history, big corporate ‘fact check’ operators crash and burn in ham-fisted attempt to discredit claims by leading medical experts that there is NO EVIDENCE of any ‘gold standard’ for the COVID19 virus.

www.faktisk.no in cahoots with their partners at Facebook and Dagbladet  (one of Norway’s largest newspapers with 1,400,000 daily readers) came out last week to attempt to discredit Principia Scientific International(PSI).

A PSI post shared among thousands of Facebooking Norwegians showed that no laboratory anywhere has yet proven the existence of any new and unique ‘deadly’ pathogen behind the pandemic.

But censors at FB banned the PSI post because their appointed Scandinavian gatekeepers to truth, Faktisk, couldn’t allow this truth to be shared. Curiously,  Faktisk styles itself as a non-profit that seeks to:

“contribute to an open, inclusive and fact-based public conversation. By reviewing the basis for current statements that affect our perception of reality, we work for a fact-based exchange of words and a constructive public debate.”

But they foolishly brought a metaphorical knife to a gun fight when lining up a rebuttal to Principia Scientific’s claims…..

In reply to our honest and reliable quote from the CDC that it had admitted that is has NOT isolated, reproduced and verified the virus that causes COVID19 our Norwegian gatekeepers to truth gave this ill-mannered rebuke to Dr Saaed Qureshi, the author of the PSI article:

“This is so stupid that I do not know where to start, and a good example of how wrong it can go when people who lack completely fundamental professional insight start reading texts that require just this, Vegard Eldholm writes in an email to Faktisk.no.

He has a doctorate in molecular microbiology and works as a senior researcher at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health.

– This is about a pure technicality. An important point with the wording is that it does not say that “no virus exists”, but that no “quantified virus isolate is available”, Eldholm points out.

Fredrik Müller is professor and head of the department of microbiology at the Department of Laboratory Medicine at Oslo University Hospital. He explains what the lack of quantified virus isolate entails:

– This means that they did not have SARS-CoV-2 virus with a known number of virus copies per milliliter of solution (“diluent”) in which the virus is distributed. It can be a comprehensive task to make such a virus preparation where the exact number of copies is known , Müller writes in an e-mail to Faktisk.no.

– This in no way means that the virus is not isolated, the professor emphasizes.”

Firstly, the claim that Dr Saeed Qureshi “lack completely fundamental professional insight” is a defamatory and scandalous lie.

In fact, Dr Qureshi is an internationally recognised expert in the areas of pharmacokinetics, biopharmaceutics, drug dissolution testing, analytical chemistry and at the top of his field in expressing an opinion on the validity or otherwise on the claims about whether ANY laboratory in the world has successfully proven a ‘gold standard’ for the SARS-COV-2 virus, the alleged cause of the pandemic.

But for the fact that Norway prides itself for not having libel laws and operates a completely free press we would be seeking a legal claim against Faktisk.no  for damages.

After some more pseudoscience waffle the ‘fact checker’ then seeks to assure Norwegians that a valid ‘gold standard’ for the novel coronavirus does exist – only that you can’t see it!

It is, in fact, much like the veritable climate unicorn aka man-made global warming. It ‘does’ exist, but only on government science computer models. Nowhere in the real world will you find hard, definitive empirical evidence as per the traditional scientific method (as per Koch’s postulates – the accepted international standard).

Acting as apologists for the CDC as to why they can’t openly show the public independently verifiable proof of the existence of this novel pathogen Faktisk.no  proceed to lie further and declare:

“Vegard Eldholm explains that it is very laborious to estimate the exact number of virus particles in a patient sample using methods other than those described in the CDC document.”

Did you get that? It is “very laborious” for the CDC to make the extra effort to provide a ‘gold standard’ for COVID19!

So, they didn’t do it.

Faktisk (and their globalists masters) want you to believe that the most costly pandemic, resulting in the shut down of 80 percent of the global economy, is not worth the time and expense to thoroughly and scientifically very it’s existence!

And these are the people leading the fight to find a vaccine to defeat this virus?

But this story gets even more farcical as these loons then tell Norwegians:

“According to Professor Fredrik Müller, there is absolutely no doubt that SARS-CoV-2 exists:

– The virus from many people in many countries in the world has been examined in laboratories, and it has been imaged in human cells by electron microscopy. The virus has also been shown to be present by detecting “bits” of it, such as viral proteins and viral genetic material (RNA), he writes to Faktisk.no.”

“Bits of it”??

Well, even non-scientists can see this pandemic has become farce not science; real science demands full disclosure and clarity.

Our position, at Principia Scientific International is made very clear, as follows:

• These ‘scientists’ are testing for an RNA sequence, not the virus
• There is NO gold standard
• COVID19 has NEVER been purified and visualized
• Only visualized from ONE patient inside a human cell
• The PCR tests in common use were never tested against a gold standard
• PCR testing CANNOT detect virus (only RNA) it is useless for diagnosis

What  crooked ‘fact checkers’ are doing is trying to blind a scientifically illiterate public with handwaving appeals to authority and not a shred of robust, hard scientific fact.

Principia Scientific International’s 6,500+ members stand with what 30,000 medical experts attest to in the Great Barrington Declaration.

Like them, we back peer-reviewed evidence such as that below from Mavian et al (2020) who tell us that:

“a plethora of analyses based on viral sequences has already been published, in scientific journals as well as through non-peer reviewed channels, to investigate SARS-CoV-2 genetic heterogeneity and spatiotemporal dissemination.” [Genetic mutations and distance/time spread] “We examined all full genome sequences currently available to assess the presence of sufficient information for reliable phylogenetic and phylogeographic studies. Our analysis clearly shows severe limitations in the present data, in light of which any finding should be considered, at the very best, preliminary and hypothesisgenerating.” [1]

TIMELINE OF COVID19 FRAUD

We urge readers to follow the timeline of events in the pandemic as it unfolded. The point of this timeline is to demonstrate that no laboratory has so far successfully isolated this new virus, purified and visualised it. We simply have no idea what it looks like despite all those CG1 images abounding online.

So, from the beginning, in December 2019 the first reported cases for the novel coronavirus were reported at Wuhan, China. Chinese medical teams then worked to identify the pathogen;  a cluster of patients with pneumonia of unknown cause were determined to be linked to a seafood market in Wuhan, China.

On December 31, the Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (China CDC), dispatched a “rapid response” team to conduct an investigation. They stated:

“Evidence for the presence of this virus includes identification in bronchoalveolar-lavage (BALF) fluid in three patients by whole-genome sequencing, direct PCR, and culture… The illness likely to have been caused by this CoV was named “novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia” (NCIP).” [2]

Dr Andy Kaufman, who analysed the methods used by the Chinese, has been very critical. He explained his findings in a March 2020 video interview:

“When they took this lung fluid out, they did not first try to find a virus in there and separate it out and purify it. But the first thing they did was find and separate some kind of genetic material. Quite an interesting strategy. And what they found was some RNA. But I’ll tell you that in our bodies at any given time, there is some free genetic material circulating around our blood and body fluids…. There are quite a number of different sources of different genetic material.” (Emphasis added) [3]

Dr Kaufman explains that the Chinese, in their explanation of their methodology, admit they did not isolate and purify the virus. As such, they could not claim to have a verifiable ‘gold standard.’

But it gets, worse. Dr Kaufman goes as far as to state that the ‘crown-like particles’ that the Chinese scientists determined to be those of ‘novel’ Covid-19 were virtually identical to electron microscope examples of exosomes- particles which are naturally occurring in the body. As such, standard scientific methodology demands the Chinese samples must be dismissed as verifiable proof of a novel coronavirus.

The above is explained in more scientific detail at COVID-19: Pandemic: Profit: Fallout M Harrison. [4]

Interestingly, Zhou and Yang et al. (2020) even admit that they did not use animal experiments or follow Koch’s postulates.

The whole charade gets even more insane when, in December 2019:

“Professor Christian Drosten created the first diagnostic PCR test for detection of Covid-19 using nose, sputum or throat swabs. Drosten et al’s paper states the PCR test was designed “before release of the first [genetic] sequence of the Wuhan virus.”[5]

Professor Christian Drosten is a Member of the German International Advisory Board on Global Health and has ties to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

What will shock readers is that Drosten’s team designed their PCR test BEFORE the publication of the genomic sequence and without a virus isolate.

As the journal Nature reported:

 “Because they did not have access to samples of the virus, Drosten’s team worked from their knowledge of SARS-CoV-2’s close relative, the SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV).”

So, Drosten assumed much and went for an approximation rather than the actual pathogen itself.

The whole thing was such a botch job that even the World Health Organisation (WHO) admitted:

“Several assays that detect the 2019-nCoV have been and are currently under development, both in-house and commercially. Some assays may detect only the novel virus and some may also detect other strains (e.g. SARS-CoV) that are genetically similar”. (Emphasis added)

Curiously, the WHO admission was quietly removed from their website on April 14, 2020 but a permanent copy remains at webarchive.org. [6]

Critical of this chicanery is Dr Wolfgang Wodarg, a German physician and Health Policy Adviser. He is an Honorary Member of the Parliamentary Assembly of Council of Europe (PACE) and a Board Member of Transparency International. Dr Wodarg was scathing in his criticisms during an interview with Oval Media. [7]

In January 2020 events in this story moved to Australia. The Doherty Institute made the claim to be the first in the world to isolate the Covid-19 virus outside of China.

As concernedlawyersnetwork.net ([page 32) tells us:

“On the 23rd of January 2020, the Australian government’s Department of Health published national guidelines for diagnosis and management of the ‘Novel Coronavirus 2019’.

This document states that Covid-19 virus was not yet internationally available as a test positive control. ‘Synthetic positive control material’ (genome sequencing) was becoming available through WHO’s viral archive. The guidelines stated that SARS-CoV could be used as an ‘interim positive control’ for testing.” [emphasis added]

Make sure you remember that SARS-CoV has never been confirmed as a close relative of the novel virus claimed to have been identified in the current pandemic so using it as an “interim positive control” confirms that this is NOT an exact science, it is mostly guesswork.

The Doherty Institute were relied on by their government to develop the national positive test control, reportedly from a sample of (a) one patient and (b) reliance on SARSCoV as a positive control!

This falls short of any reasonable determination of a controlled, “peer reviewed” or impartial assessment of test accuracy So, the Aussies are no less slipshod than the Germans and Chinese. [8]

So woolly is the science in this area that the Australian Department of Health’s website infers that Covid-19 tests cannot tell if a person is actually ill or not: “…it should be noted that PCR tests cannot distinguish between “live” virus and non- infective RNA.” (Emphasis added) [9]

The hypocrisy of WHO on this matter is utterly appalling because their own Organisation’s paper ‘WHO recommendations on the use of rapid testing for influenza diagnosis’, states:

 “The accuracy of an influenza diagnostic test is determined by the sensitivity and specificity of the test to detect an influenza virus infection compared with a “gold” standard …” [10]

So, even WHO’s own words prove this pandemic ’emperor’ has no clothes. Watch this space – we will be following up the above article with a further robust analysis from Dr Saeed Qureshi.

References:

[1] Regaining perspective on SARS-CoV-2 molecular tracing and its implications, Carla Mavian, Simone Marini, Costanza Manes, Ilaria Capua, Mattia Prosperi, Marco Salemidoi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.16.20034470

[2] Zhu et al. (2020) https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2001017

[3] https://www.bitchute.com/video/YKqu3TLnANNX/ (view from 5:00)

[4] https://concernedlawyersnetwork.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Harrison-research-report-on-covid19-original.pdf (at page 25)

[5] https://concernedlawyersnetwork.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Harrison-research-report-on-covid19-original.pdf  (at page 27)

[6]https://web.archive.org/web/20200328000948/https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technical-guidance/laboratory-guidance

[7] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_AyuhbnPOI

[8] https://www.mja.com.au/sites/default/files/issues/212_10/mja250569-sup-0001-Supinfo.pdf

[9] https://concernedlawyersnetwork.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Harrison-research-report-on-covid19-original.pdf (page 36)

[10]https://www.who.int/influenza/resources/documents/RapidTestInfluenza_WebVersion.pdf

Please DONATE below any amount to help fund our fight against the peddlers of the fake pandemic

About the author: John O’Sullivan John is CEO and co-founder (with Dr Tim Ball) of Principia Scientific International (PSI).  John is a seasoned science writer and legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann in the ‘science trial of the century‘. O’Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘Slayers’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world’s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book.

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.

Trackback from your site.