First electric autonomous cargo ship launched in Norway

Zero emissions and, soon, zero crew: the world’s first fully electric autonomous cargo vessel was unveiled in Norway, a small but promising step toward reducing the maritime industry’s climate footprint.

By shipping up to 120 containers of fertilizer from a plant in the southeastern town of Porsgrunn to the Brevik port a dozen kilometres (about eight miles) away, the much-delayed Yara Birkeland, shown off to the media on Friday, will eliminate the need for around 40,000 truck journeys a year that are now fuelled by ‘polluting’ diesel.

“Of course, there have been difficulties and setbacks,” said Svein Tore Holsether, chief executive of Norwegian fertiliser giant Yara.

“But then it feels even more rewarding to stand here today in front this ship and see that we were able to do it,” he said, with the sleek blue-and-white vessel moored behind him in an Oslo dock, where it had been sailed for the event.

The 80-metre, 3,200-deadweight tonne ship will soon begin two years of working trials during which it will be fine-tuned to learn to manoeuvre on its own.

The wheelhouse could disappear altogether in “three, four or five years”, said Holsether, once the vessel makes its 7.5-nautical-mile trips on its own with the aid of sensors.

“Quite a lot of the incidents happening on vessels are due to human error, because of fatigue for instance,” project manager Jostein Braaten said from the possibly doomed bridge.

“Autonomous operating can enable a safe journey,” he said.

While the distance the Yara Birkeland will cover may be short, it will face many obstacles.

It will have to navigate in a narrow fjord, and sail under two bridges while managing currents and heavy traffic from merchant ships, pleasure craft and kayaks, before docking at one of Norway’s busiest ports.

The next few months will be a learning period.

“First of all, we have to detect that there’s something there. We have to understand that it’s a kayak, then we have to determine what to do with that,” said Braaten.

“Currently, large vessels don’t do much with a kayak. They can’t do much. They can warn, but they cannot manoeuvre away” or reverse to avoid an incident.

Autonomous navigation will require a new set of regulations that do not exist yet.

‘100 Teslas’

On board the Yara Birkeland, the traditional machine room has been replaced by eight battery compartments, giving the vessel a capacity of 6.8 MWh—sourced from renewable hydroelectricity.

“That’s the equivalent of 100 Teslas,” says Braaten.

The maritime sector, which is responsible for almost three percent of all man-made emissions, aims to reduce its emissions by 40 percent by 2030 and 50 percent by 2050.

Despite that, the sector has seen a rise in recent years.

International and domestic shipping and fishing combined, the industry emitted more than one billion tonnes of ‘greenhouse gases’ in 2018, up from 962 million tons in 2012, according to the latest figures from the International Maritime Organization.

By itself, the Yara Birkeland’s contribution to global climate efforts will be just a drop in the ocean—eliminating 678 tonnes of carbon dioxide per year churned out by the redundant trucks.

And experts don’t expect electric vessels to become a universal solution for the industry any time soon.

“Electricity has a ‘niche’ use, in particular for ferries as these are often short and stable routes, possibly on coastal and river transports. But it’s not well-adapted for long ocean crossings,” said Camille Egloff, a maritime transport expert at Boston Consulting Group.

“Not only would (a vessel) need to be autonomous for long distances but you would also have to equip ports with (large) battery chargers. So there are technical and infrastructure challenges that would need to be coordinated,” she said.

While dozens of electric ferries already criss-cross the fjords of Norway—a major oil and gas producer which is paradoxically also a leader in electric transport—ocean liners will have to rely on other technologies to go green, such as LNG, e-methanol and hydrogen.

See more here: techxplore.com

Editor’s note: PSI’s position is that there are no such things as ‘greenhouse gases’, and we wonder at the cost of this virtue-signalling white elephant.

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (9)

  • Avatar

    very old white guy

    |

    What did they build it out of? What is the power source made of? How many tons of coal were used to smelt the steel? How much energy was used to produce the materials used? It has one hell of a big carbon footprint.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      richard

      |

      I’m betting all the materials used in the heavy construction came from coal burning countries.

      Reply

    • Avatar

      Boris Badeov

      |

      400,000 tons capacity, 300,000 tons of batteries. Makes perfect sense.

      Reply

  • Avatar

    Howdy

    |

    “Autonomous operating can enable a safe journey,”
    Experience in the EV market proves otherwise, and you don’t just stamp on the anchors to stop a water borne vessel as you would on land.
    I guess there will be a standby fleet of tugs with grappling hooks to arrest any rogue actions should the crew lose control.

    “Not only would (a vessel) need to be autonomous for long distances…”
    So the current distance travelled by crewed ships is short?

    I’d like to see this handle mid ocean storm waves… Totally untrustworthy.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Allan Shelton

    |

    And then the hackers take control of the navigation system and ram whatever>>>>>>>>>>>> hmmmmm

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Allan Shelton

    |

    Or hijack the goods.
    No pirates required………..

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Chistian LOOSLI

    |

    Since when is CO2 a problem ? When that is the prior motivation than it is build on sand and it will have no futur. Better take some of Nicolas Tesla invention or nuclear thorium powered engines. May be a lot of goods are not really needed to be shipt around the world. Here we could save a lot more fioul.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Tom O

    |

    Pretty, and pretty pathetic as well. My guess would be that it would have been cheaper and more realistic to build a tug and a barge, and save most of those terrible metric tonnes of carbon emissions used to create the thing.

    Also – “ocean liners will have to rely on other technologies to go green, such as LNG, e-methanol and hydrogen.”

    Makes perfect sense to use up energy – electrolyzing hydrogen, liquefying NG, or e-methanol ( eMethanol™ can be produced from feedstocks obtained by utilization of waste streams, electrolysis hydrogen, and CO2 capture.) – to produce a substitute for carbon fuels, which deliver more power than they use to make them, instead of the opposite.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Jasper's Farm

    |

    What happens to the batteries when they need to be replaced? Feel sorry for the people that need to live next to that landfill.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via