FDA knew there would be many COVID cases among fully vaxxed
First of all, I have to re-emphasize a point I’ve made many times: SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t exist. I’ve been proving that for over a year.
BUT I don’t stop there. I temporarily enter the official world where people assume the virus does exist, and I reveal many internal contradictions and lies and cover-ups within that world.
Some readers, who possess sub-standard literacy, believe I’m contradicting MYSELF. They think I’m saying the virus doesn’t exist and does exist.
Wrong.
Analogy: People sitting inside a theater are watching a movie, and they believe it’s a real world. They react in all sorts of strange ways, based on that assumption. You’re standing outside the theater, looking through the window. You can just say, “They’re all crazy,” and leave it at that, or you can say, “They’re all crazy,” and THEN walk inside the theater and get a good look at what they’re up to as well. That’s what I do.
That’s what I’m doing in this article, which is about the FDA and their emergency authorization of the COVID vaccine, despite knowing the vaccine didn’t pass muster, didn’t even vaguely rank as effective in the clinical trials.
Because lots of people in the clinical trial became COVID cases after being vaccinated.
In other words, the FDA knew, right from the get-go, that many so-called breakthrough cases would develop. They knew many vaccinated people would become COVID cases.
This knowledge should have prevented the FDA from granting emergency use authorization for the vaccine—but it didn’t.
(Reminder: We’re in the crazy fake theater now, where the virus is real, the PCR test is meaningful and accurate, the vaccine is necessary.)
Here we go.
The document, posted on the FDA website, is titled, “Vaccines and Related Biological Products; Advisory Committee Meeting; FDA Briefing Document Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.” [1]
It is dated December 10, 2020. The date tells us that all the information in the document is taken from the Pfizer clinical trial, based on which the FDA authorized the vaccine for public use.
A key quote is buried on page 42: “Among 3410 total cases of suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 in the overall study population, 1594 occurred in the vaccine group vs. 1816 in the placebo group [who received a saltwater shot].”
Those shocking numbers have never seen the light of day in news media.
The comparative numbers reveal that the vaccine was not effective at preventing COVID-19. It was certainly not 50 percent more effective than a placebo shot—the standard for FDA Emergency Use Authorization.
To make all this clear, I need to back up and explain the theory of the vaccine clinical trial.
The researchers assumed the SARS-CoV-2 virus was spreading everywhere in the world, and during the clinical trial, it would descend on some volunteers.
The billion-dollar question was: how many people receiving the vaccine would become infected, vs. how many people in the placebo group?
If it turned out that FAR FEWER people getting the vaccine became infected with SARS-CoV-2, the vaccine would be hailed as a success. It protected people against the virus.
But as you can see from the numbers above, that wasn’t the case at all.
So now we come to the vital weasel-phrase in the FDA document I just quoted: “suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 [cases].”
“Well, you see, we can’t say these were ACTUAL COVID-19 cases. Maybe they were, maybe they weren’t. They’re in limbo. We want to keep them in limbo. Otherwise, our clinical trial is dead in the water, and we’ll never get approval for the vaccine.”
What does “suspected cases” mean? It can only mean these people all displayed symptoms consistent with the definition of COVID-19, but they’re unconfirmed cases because…their PCR tests were negative, not positive.
However, if their tests were negative, why would they be called “suspected cases” instead of “NOT CASES”?
Something is wrong here. The FDA is hedging its bets, muddying the waters, obscuring facts.
By FDA/CDC rules, a case of COVID-19 means: a person has tested positive, period.
That’s the way cases are counted.
These thousand-plus volunteers in the Pfizer clinical trial were either COVID-19 cases or they weren’t. Which is it?
The official response to that question is obvious: the FDA decided to throw the data from all those “suspected cases” in the garbage and ignore them. Poof. Gone.
Why do I say that?
Because if the FDA had paid serious attention to the “suspected cases,” they never would have authorized the vaccine for public use. They would have stopped the clinical trial and undertaken a very deep and extensive investigation.
Which they didn’t.
This is called a crime.
“But…but it’s not that simple. This is a complex situation. It’s a gray area.”
“No. It isn’t. If you were running a clinical trial of a new drug, and a few thousand people in the trial, who were given the drug, nevertheless came down with the disease symptoms the drug was supposed to cure, wouldn’t you cancel the trial and go back to the drawing board?”
“You mean if we were being honest? That’s a joke, right? We’re not honest. Don’t you get it?”
Yes. I get it. You’re criminals. Killers.
But wait. There’s more. The FDA document also states: “Suspected COVID-19 cases that occurred within 7 days after any vaccination were 409 in the vaccine group vs. 287 in the placebo group.”
That’s explosive. Right after vaccination, 409 people who received the shots became “suspected COVID cases.” This alone should have been enough to stop the clinical trial altogether. But it wasn’t.
In fact, the FDA document tries to excuse those 409 cases with a slippery comment: “It is possible that the imbalance in suspected COVID-19 cases occurring in the 7 days post vaccination represents vaccine reactogenicity with symptoms that overlap with those of COVID-19.”
Translation: You see, a number of clinical symptoms of COVID-19 and adverse effects from the vaccine are the same. Therefore, we have no idea whether the vaccinated people developed COVID or were just reacting to the vaccine. So we’re going to ignore this whole mess and pretend it’s of no importance.
Back in April of 2020, I predicted the vaccine manufacturers would use this strategy to explain away COVID cases occurring in the vaccine groups of their clinical trials.
It’s called cooking the data. It’s a way of writing off and ignoring COVID symptoms in the vaccine group.
And the FDA document, as I stated above, just puts an impenetrable cloud over all the volunteers in the Pfizer clinical trial by inventing a category called “suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 cases,” and throwing those crucial data away, never to be spoken of again.
I’m speaking about them now. Any sensible person, looking at them, would conclude that the vaccine should never have been authorized.
Unless fraud, deception, profits, and destruction of human life via the vaccine were and are the true goals.
Finally: When you have “suspected cases,” and their ultimate status depends on doing a test, you do the test. You do it as many times as you need to, until it registers positive or negative. Then each “suspected case” becomes an actual case or no case at all.
Perhaps these “suspected cases” in the clinical trial were tested, and many of them came up positive, revealing they were actual COVID cases—but the researchers lied and covered up the fact that they were tested.
Or if you really don’t want to know whether “suspected cases” are actual cases, you don’t test them. You leave them in a convenient limbo and park them, never to be seen again.
Either way, the situation is patently absurd. By official standards, the PCR test decides whether a person is a case or not a case. Just do the test. Saying “we don’t know” is nothing more than a con and a hustle.
I’d love to hear the researchers try to talk their way out of this one. Here is how the conversation might go:
“So you’re saying these several thousand suspected COVID cases couldn’t be adjudicated one way or another?”
“That’s right. Their PCR tests were ‘indeterminate’.”
“That says something devastating about the test itself.”
“Well, sometimes you just can’t tell whether it’s positive or negative.”
“I see. And this ‘indeterminate’ result occurred in more than a THOUSAND suspected cases.”
“I guess so, yes.”
“You know, you could have done something else with these suspected cases. A different test. You could have taken tissue samples and looked for the virus itself in a more direct way.”
“No. That wouldn’t work.”
“Why not?”
“Because…the actual virus…”
“Because no one has been able to come up with a specimen of the actual SARS-CoV-2 virus.”
“Right.”
“So tell me—what does that indicate? I’ll tell you what it indicates. You can’t prove the SARS-CoV-2 virus exists. It doesn’t exist.”
“I have to go. I’m late for a meeting.”
“You’re late for more than just a meeting. Is it true a person becomes a virologist by cutting out a coupon from the back of a comic book and mailing it to a PO Box in Maryland?’
“Absolutely not. That’s outrageous.”
“What then?”
“The PO Box is in Virginia.”
SOURCES:
[1] https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download
See more here: nomorefakenews.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Ron
| #
So you are saying by you leaving out comments about the breakthrough examples of Covid, after the Pfizer or Modena Vaccine, how they vaccines have helped to reduce the severity of Covid are. Not real?
Reply
MC
| #
Ron. We’re over here.
Reply
Squidly
| #
“how they vaccines have helped to reduce the severity of Covid” .. PROVE IT !!!
Reply
Alan
| #
It is a pity that you started this article off by saying that the virus does not exist, because putting this first weakens the argument about the trials, which assume the virus must exist. If the virus does not exist, then what is causing the deaths and what does the test find?
What shocks me about the trials is how readily people have accepted these experimental vaccines and the propaganda coming from the health authorities and the governments. Do people really know so little about the lengthy trials for the standard vaccines and other drugs that are essential to bring them safely to market? The FDA document reveals how trials can be distorted to give better results and you have pointed all this out. It is a disgrace, and the FDA accepts it all, as well as government advisers and the media.
You don’t mention the data in the Executive summary which were used to calculate the efficacy of the vaccine so the context of the 3410 suspected cases is not clear without reading the FDA document. This is important to show the lies in the trial results presented to us. When the published Pfizer results are compared to other manufacturers, they all look similar, so are they all doing the same?
Pfizer had a protocol for the trials and so they were able to exclude the 3410 suspected cases. It is astonishing that Pfizer can get away with this and I would have thought the FDA would have raised the same issues that you do. The problem is that data associated with the 3410 cases may not reliable. Your conclusions are the obvious ones to draw about the effectiveness of the vaccines, but they depend on the validity of the data.
None of the trials included their effectiveness in reducing deaths, but the vaccines are being promoted to reduce deaths. We don’t know from the trial results what the efficacy means. Does it reduce the risk of infection? I don’t think so because the risk is very low anyway. Does it reduce the risk of hospitalisation? Not included in the trials. We really have no idea about the benefits of the vaccines and no knowledge of the long-term risks. There are data from some US states that appear to show that rates of vaccination have negligible effect on cases. In the UK we hear daily of the death rate, but we are not told how many of the people have had the vaccine. It all looks like a huge coverup.
You mention the 409 suspect cases 7 days after vaccination, but you don’t mention there were only 287 cases in the placebo group which makes the vaccines even more suspect.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Alan and PSI Readers,
I do not claim to know anything about any virus for I have never studied biology beyond the 9th Grade. However, I do claim I had learned to read, maybe by the 5th Grade.
Alan you began your comment: “It is a pity that you started this article off by saying that the virus does not exist,” Jon had begun: “First of all, I have to re-emphasize a point I’ve made many times: SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t exist.” Right or wrong, Jon did not write that NOTHING existed; he specifically stated that SARS-CoV-2 does not exist.
Alan, you conclude your opening statement with a very good question: “If the virus does not exist, then what is causing the deaths and what does the test find?”
Then you review past history which forces me to conclude: We do not really KNOW anything!!! Which is the basic problem because some AUTHORITIES claim to KNOW EVERYTHING and SEEM not interested in answering your GOOD QUESTION!!!
Have a good day, Jerry
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Alan and PSI Readers,
In a recent comment I had written: “The story about Ivermectin, as I read it here at PSI, began at this link (https://principia-scientific.com/the-drug-that-cracked-covid/).
If you read the story at this link, you will find a story of medical people whose objective was not to PREVENT whatever might be the cause of DEATHS; but instead was to find a cheap TREATMENT for whatever illness is killing people.
Have a good day, Jerry
Reply
Howdy
| #
If covid does not exist, no problem. Isn’t It the case that whatever killed somebody during the scamdemic, covid was claimed anyway? Many people die every year, so just use a made up reason for all, and you are good to go. Claiming flu and other respiratory causes just makes it look all the more authentic. Throw in some trials, plenty of propaganda, fake leaders. Done and dusted, as we now are.
Reply
Stanza Widen
| #
Where is Bill Gates?
Reply
Andrew Pilkington
| #
Thanks, Jon.
Reply
sir_isO
| #
Viruses don’t exist as claimed. Go read what Stefan Lanka says. Your cells break, fragments of cells are misattributed and used to sell garbage.
People get sick from EMF, masks, lockdowns, typical toxins, shitty nutrition, medications and among other things, vitamin D deficiency in winter. Quite predictably. All of that stuff, causes cellular damage.
Old man with no sunlight exposure, lots of mitochondrial dysfunction gets sick in winter.
Child with sunlight exposure, good mitochondrial function, does not.
Not difficult to understand.
ANYONE peddling virus garbage is a piece of a shit. Stefan Lanka makes it pretty clear that virology is ENTIRELY fraud. Not only him, either.
Oh and here’s an odd article:
Here’s How Graphene Oxide in All Covid ‘Vaccines’ is Slowly Killing the Vaccinatet
http://stateofthenation.co/?p=78437
Reply
sir_isO
| #
And what I said about what causes sickness (the results misattributed to viruses), is also what someone like Jon Rappoport says, about ANY disease. Because it’s consistent and true.
Reply
sir_isO
| #
Oh btw, while I’m trolling.
Have you considered the implications of using genetic material for say, data storage? Like I mentioned with iron oxide transforming, through hijacking into clumped magnetite, to act as EMF amplification but also magnetic storage, as per IBM research?
Or perhaps you’ve wondered about “scaffolding” with helical carbon nanotubes (have you wondered why there are those rods associated with the vaccinated blood)?
Or perhaps something like this?
New study shows the potential of DNA-based data-structures systems
https://aibiotechnology.com/new-study-shows-the-potential-of-dna-based-data-structures-systems/
I’m telling you again, the vaccinated are being BORGED.
Reply
sir_isO
| #
Which is why I’m opting for the uhm, “brightest light” sort of solution. I’m sure many ex-people will be angered at my decision, but they shouldn’t have souled the fuck out. So they get destroyed.
Reply
sir_isO
| #
DNA-Templated Carbon Nanotube Field-Effect Transistor
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/302/5649/1380.full
Application of carbon nanotubes in cancer vaccines: Achievements, challenges and chances
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30659906/
Building circuit boards using DNA scaffolding
https://newatlas.com/dna-scaffolding/12568/
Carbon nanotube applications for tissue engineering
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0142961206006569
No Assembly Required: DNA brings carbon nanotube circuits in line
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/no-assembly-required-dna-brings-carbon-nanotube-circuits-line
But hey, stay blind.
Reply
sir_isO
| #
https://www.globalresearch.ca/humanity-march-toward-extinction/5750260
“Without Pasteur’s theory, most modern drugs would never be produced, promoted, or prescribed—a fact that explains why today’s medical establishment and its codependent pharmaceutical industry refuse to recognise their flaws or own up to their ineffectiveness.
By contrast, “terrain theory,” which was initiated by Claude Bernard (1813–1878) and later built upon by Antoine Béchamp (1816–1908), alleges that the terrain—that is, the internal environment of the body—and not an external germ determines our health or lack thereof. What Béchamp referred to as “terrain” is very close to what modern medicine has now termed the innate immune system. As we will see in the following paragraphs, Béchamp was definitely on the right track in discovering how the human body really interacts with the outside environment.
Unlike Pasteur, Béchamp did have an academic background in science. He believed disease to be a biological result of the changes that take place in the body when its metabolic processes become imbalanced. When the body is in a state of imbalance, Béchamp alleged, germs become symptoms that in turn stimulate more symptoms, which eventually lead to disease.
Although Béchamp was moving in the right direction with his terrain theory, Rockefeller’s germ-dependent pharmaceutical tyranny has prevailed, due largely to substantial infusions of money, which Rockefeller and Carnegie gladly supplied in the form of grants to universities, hospitals, and medical research facilities. Their “philanthropic” largess, which easily exceeded $100 million, enabled them to influence the policy of the entire US medical establishment and eventually most of the Western nations, steering them toward an exclusively chemical-based allopathic regime.”
And yes, you are very much progressing directly towards extinction.
Reply
sir_isO
| #
And I don’t even care anymore.
When I go get some beer and 95%+ of the morons are wearing masks, I know they’ve devolved so much that there is no hope. Guys alone in their cars…with masks on…with their windows open.
I don’t ever want to associate with those sort of things, sorry. They’re fucking lost. And don’t for a moment think it’s just because they’re stupid (which they are), it’s because they’re actually shit. Coz society breeds sociopsychopatheticism, as a cult.
Reply