Your personality is linked to risk of dementia

A study involving nearly 2,000 people found links between personality traits and the likelihood of moving toward or away from dementia.

Picture two individuals. The first is highly organized, with excellent self-discipline and an extensive collection of post-it notes. The second is a bit more frazzled, worried, and emotionally unstable. Now, let’s turn time forward to view our subjects in their upper 70s. If you had to guess, which person do you think might be suffering from cognitive decline — maybe even dementia?

It turns out that a lifetime of being organized and productive might protect the brain. In situations of high stress and anxiety, the brain might be working harder. Experienced consistently across an average lifespan, that condition can damage the brain.

These two sets of behavior reflect one of many personality differences that researchers know can add up to influence health outcomes.

A new study from the American Psychological Association, published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, suggests that certain personality traits also affect the cognitive decline of older adults. Led by author Tomiko Yoneda from the University of Victoria, the researchers found that individuals with high conscientiousness were much less likely to develop dementia.

Further, they had more capacity to recover from moderate impairment. Neurotic individuals — people more prone to stress and worry — were more likely to plunge into cognitive decline, and to stay there.

The researchers leveraged data from nearly two decades of annual assessments taken on nearly 2,000 older adults to estimate the association between personality traits and the risk of cognitive decline. This model structure allowed the researchers to assess the entire pathway of cognitive impairment. It provided new insights on how the progression of each stage influences the other, and how personality might play a role in regulating all of it.

The role of personality

Your personality acts as an internal compass. Throughout your life, it guides you toward or away from certain behaviors and thought patterns — factors that over a lifetime might harm or benefit your health, resilience to disease, and longevity.

A common way to assess personality is to rank an individual according to the Big Five personality traits: extroversion, agreeableness, openness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism. Because we all have personality — and a vested interest to live — we all want to know how personality traits affect the quality and span of our lives. The question has implications for policymakers, doctors, and researchers who work in public health.

The association between personality and lifespan has gotten a lot of attention, resulting in a broad understanding that personality does matter. For example, conscientious individuals, who tend to be highly organized and self-disciplined, are less likely to engage in violence and drug use. They are also more likely to have a healthy diet and to exercise well.

On the other hand, neurotic individuals, who may be naturally prone to anxiety and stress, are likelier to turn to short-term relief involving drugs, alcohol, or even violence. Plus, chronic stress is associated with lower brain volume and other biological markers of cognitive decline.

Building a model

To examine the association between personality traits and cognitive health, researchers analyzed data from 1,954 participants in the Rush Memory Aging Program. This program tracks and studies the mental and physical health of older adults (average age of 80) living in the greater Chicago region. It began in 1997, when participants without a dementia diagnosis were recruited from senior housing facilities, church groups, and other organizations.

As part of the program, the participants received one personality assessment through the NEO Five Factor Inventory. Each trait is scored, with a higher score indicating higher levels of each trait. A composite score between 0 and 48 rated traits like neuroticism and conscientiousness. Scores from 0 to 24 measured extraversion, the trait that defines how much an individual enjoys and seeks out social engagement.

Participants also receive annual assessments across a variety of biological and neurophysiological variables. In exams of cognitive impairment, each individual is diagnosed as having either no cognitive impairment, mild to moderate cognitive impairment, or dementia.

For their study assessing personality traits and cognitive impairment, the researchers also considered covariates like sex; education; and history of illnesses such as heart disease, stroke, vascular disease, and depressive symptoms. Females comprised the vast majority of participants (74 percent).

The authors thought of impairment as a three-staged process. It proceeds from normal health toward moderate decline and eventually ends in dementia. They fit this information into a statistical model called multistate survival modeling, which discriminates between the effects of factors at different stages of impairment and allows for an individual to move forward and backward between stages.

For example, the researchers were especially interested in the transition from normal brain health to moderate decline, and the potential recovery away from cognitive impairment back to normal health.

Out of the five key personality traits, they studied conscientiousness, neuroticism, and extraversion. They asked whether any of these traits were associated with progression toward dementia, and away from it.

It pays to be organized

The results of the models were unequivocal: Individuals who scored higher on measures of conscientiousness had a decreased risk of cognitive impairment, whereas subjects that scored higher in neuroticism suffered the opposite fate. The latter were more likely to move forward through the stages of cognitive impairment.

Extraversion scores had a more complex association with cognitive decline. According to the model, the most extroverted individuals received no special protection against cognitive impairment. However, once these individuals developed moderate levels of impairment, they were more likely to recover, suggesting that higher extroversion might cause these individuals to seek out help. Once dementia sets in, these benefits are already exhausted.

Overall, women were less likely to experience cognitive decline than men, and higher education was associated with a decreased risk of cognitive impairment. None of the personality traits were associated with life expectancy.

Personality can only do so much

Most of the significant associations that the researchers found concerned the initial onset of cognitive impairment. The transition toward dementia and death was not associated with any specific personality trait.

When taken as a whole, these results demonstrate that people developing minor or moderate cognitive impairment have a chance to reverse the process, and that personality might tip the scales toward recovery or further impairment. However, once dementia sets in, the effects of personality fade.

In fact, of the 1,954 individuals studied, only 114 went from dementia to moderate impairment, and only 12 recovered fully. On the other hand, 725 individuals, or 37 percent percent of the study’s participants, returned to exhibiting no discernable levels of cognitive impairment after being diagnosed with minor to moderate issues.

A compelling story

The researchers were not able to assess how the other two traits in the Big Five (agreeableness and openness to experience) affect cognitive decline, though we know both traits are associated with improved health. The data also came from a very educated, very female, and very white population.

Introducing measures of openness and agreeableness on a more diverse dataset would improve the generalizability of the study and broaden our understanding of how personality traits affect the transitions between cognitive statuses and death. Additionally, the researchers pointed out that personality might change in older adults, especially those whose brains are experiencing physical changes. According to the researchers, “although personality traits are relatively stable after 30, more substantial personality change may occur during the progression to dementia.”

Still, the robust method and large sample size paint a compelling story  — a story backed by hundreds of papers studying the influence of personality. If you want to live a long, healthy life, it helps to be more diligent, organized, productive, and calm. It might even help you more than eating your broccoli.

See more here: bigthink.com

Header image: WBUR

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (17)

  • Avatar

    Alcheminister

    |

    “It turns out that a lifetime of being organized and productive might protect the brain. In situations of high stress and anxiety, the brain might be working harder. Experienced consistently across an average lifespan, that condition can damage the brain.”

    Wtf? Who wrote that?

    Reply

    • Avatar

      nafaho

      |

      I make 85 dollars each hour for working an online job at home. dso I never thought I can do it but my best friend makes 10000 bucks every month working this job and she recommended me to learn more about it.
      The potential with this is endless…>>>>>>https://t.ly/eGAt

      Reply

  • Avatar

    Howdy

    |

    “The authors thought of impairment as a three-staged process”
    Come on, it’s far more than that.

    Might, might, might. Suggesting. And using models? Not written in stone then?

    “we all want to know how personality traits affect the quality and span of our lives”
    Is that a fact? (rolleyes)

    Reply

  • Avatar

    VOWG

    |

    I hope the guys running the models were not the same idiots who ran the covid models, as they were 100% wrong.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Jerry Krause

    |

    Hi PSI Readers,

    The conclusion of this article was: “If you want to live a long, healthy life, it helps to be more diligent, organized, productive, and calm.” Four factors. Which of the four might be more important.

    For decades I have read to lessen the cognitive decline [and physical decline] of older adults one should remain mentally and physically active. From which I conclude that PRODUCTIVE is the most important factor.

    Have a good day, Jerry

    Reply

    • Avatar

      MattH

      |

      Hi Jerry Krause and those with observational lucidity.

      It is difficult to argue with productivity although some ‘productivity’ can lead to destruction of other people and that which sustains them.

      On the issue that prompted me to communicate. A couple of years ago I noticed here in the Southern Hemisphere we had a long late summer and in the Northern hemisphere you good folk (and the naughty ones) had a lingering winter that held spring at bay.

      I noticed that when winter finally arrived here winter finally broke in the Northern Hemisphere at the exact same moment, like conjoined twins.

      Exactly 24 hours ago the Southern Annular Mode drifted North far enough for the normally prevailing South Westerly airstream from the Southern ocean storms to arrive here bringing winter with it.

      I am wondering if the Northern Hemisphere has suddenly broken from winter to delightful spring or if the identical timing I noticed 2 years ago was purely co-incidental.

      Have a happy, productive day.
      Matt

      Reply

      • Avatar

        Phil Inman

        |

        Matt, Little off topic, maybe. I’m not sure.

        But I’m thinking this feels today May 14 22 here in Orange County CA like the first day of summer. Been a cool spring with few warm and no Hot days. for what that is worth.

        Reply

        • Avatar

          MattH

          |

          Hi Phil.

          That is exactly the feedback I wanted. Signs that seasonal switch may be global rather than independent within each hemisphere.

          The change here in Raglan, New Zealand is rather than our weather coming from sub equatorial regions as occurred this last summer our weather has switched to coming from the deep Southern Ocean.

          Cheers. Matt

          Reply

          • Avatar

            Mark Tapley

            |

            Not in East Texas. After cool wet spring, first week in May, already hitting over 90 deg.

        • Avatar

          Jerry Krause

          |

          Hi MattH and PSI Readers,

          “That is exactly the feedback I wanted. Signs that seasonal switch may be global rather than independent within each hemisphere.”

          I have long consider the following factors. First the North Polar region is completely different from that of the South. Hence, the North had a great deal more atmosphere over it as we all know density of the atmosphere always decreases with increasing altitude (elevation).

          Second we know that the seasonal atmospheric temperature changes are much greater than the high, continuous COLD, plateau of the Southern Polar region. However, at the coast of the Antartical Continent there are seasonal changes (I believe). But you at New Zealand know (experience) this better than I.

          But I know, when the cold Arctic atmosphere begins to warm after its winter, this lower, more dense, atmosphere warms it expands and must push a great volume of the lower level atmosphere toward the south and that this movement of atmosphere does not stop at the equator.

          Hence, I consider there is no doubt that there is a seasonal global circulation of the atmosphere

          Have a good day, Jerry

          Reply

    • Avatar

      Zoe Phin

      |

      i.e. don’t let your mind drift too much, or you’ll make it a habit.

      Always be learning and doing something new.

      Reply

      • Avatar

        Phil Inman

        |

        Zoe,
        That is exactly how it looks to me. Stay engaged or expect to become detached. I see that if I allow my mind to wander, it could get lost. This business of retirement at 65 or something. doesn’t seem a healthy prospect for men. For Women, my mom said not the same. they just keep on washing the dishes.

        Reply

  • Avatar

    Lorraine

    |

    You are what you eat and what you are exposed to in the environment. Those things and natural aging are the cause of physical and mental decline including dementia.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Alcheminister

      |

      Certainly, whatever inputs will affect you (which includes food, EM, medications, vaccines, various environmental, societal elements, sanitation products, cosmetics, clothing, toxins in air, water, etc) but mentality is associated with a significant effect (though it seems that the understanding of mentality is fairly lacking, particularly relating to results FROM excessive stressors).

      I mean, if I drink a bottle of rum coz of trauma, use a shitload of benzodiazepenes…maybe that could also affect my mentality (other than physical state).

      Reply

      • Avatar

        Alcheminister

        |

        One of the more “taboo” things to actually discuss is apparently endocrine function. If organisms are subjected to loads of endocrine disrupting (among other effects)…mental function declines (such as being delusional and thinking you’re a woman when you have a penis), so does health status.

        Reply

  • Avatar

    Mark Tapley

    |

    A person’s disposition and attitude will effect everything to a certain extent. People who are better organized and conscientious may tend to adapt a healthier lifestyle. I think however this study misses the main cause of Alzheimer’s, that being glucose intolerance. As people on the standard western diet get older they tend to develop insulin resistance as a result of consuming too much carbohydrate. This causes insulin resistance as the cells require more and more insulin in order to get the glucose out of the blood stream. The same thing happens in the brain which uses more glucose than any other organ. As the insulin resistance builds, the glucose is blocked from getting to the brain. This results in what is commonly referred to as type 3 diabetes.

    Alzheimers has become much more prevalent, just like type 2 diabetes. Both conditions have the same root cause. Almost all heart disease is also the result of insulin resistance. Dr. Joseph Kraft M.D. performed almost 14,000 insulin tests on patients over many years. His conclusion was that practically all people with heart disease were diabetic or pre diabetic, just undiagnosed.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Tom

    |

    What nonsense. They could do any study about any disease and conclude that people who who eat apples on the weekend have a greater chance of getting dementia or cancer than those who eat them during the weekdays. None of these studies prove anything. You want to avoid dementia? Then give up big pharma drugs, stop watching the TV news and quit eating junk foods.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via