Why Should We Trust The ‘Science’ of the Pharma Industry?

The forever-head of the US NIAID, Tony Fauci, has repeatedly demanded that the public “trust the science” as he shifts his own science opinion from one positon to another.

What is never mentioned in mainstream media in the West or almost anywhere in the world is the scientific record of the major global vaccine making pharmaceutical giants. In short, it is abysmal and alarming in the extreme. That alone should prohibit governments from pushing radical untested experimental injections on their populations without extensive long-term animal and other testing to assure their safety.

This past April as the US vaccination program was in high gear, the Biden chief covid adviser, 80-year-old Fauci, head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) since 1984, announced that the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had decided to order a “pause” on giving the Johnson & Johnson (Janssen) vaccine in order to examine reports of blood clots.

It turned out that there were six reported blood clot cases of some seven million who then had had the J&J covid jab. Fauci in his press remarks declared, “one of the things that’s, I think, such a good thing about our system here, is that we’re ruled by the science, not by any other consideration. There is good reason to question Fauci.

That was supposed to reassure people that the authorities were being ultra-careful with the experimental covid medications which, after all, never have been mass-tested on humans before and have only gotten “emergency use authorization,” provisional FDA approval. The FDA quickly lifted the pause as J&J agreed to print that its vaccine could cause blood clots.

Yet at the same time, rival vaccine makers, Pfizer and Moderna, both using a hyper-experimental genetic treatment known as mRNA, were not being paused by “the science” despite the fact that hundreds of thousands of alarming vaccine-related severe reactions, including official data of several thousand deaths from both, had been recorded by CDC data base, VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System).

According to the CDC such “adverse” events, post-vaccine, include anaphylaxis, thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome, Guillain-Barre Syndrome, myocarditis, pericarditis, and death. For the week of July 16 the CDC VAERS reported an alarming 9,125 reported deaths since late December from the COVID-19 vaccinations.

Never in history have such high death totals been associated with any vaccine, yet the media is deafeningly silent about this.

Their dismal science record

The wording of Fauci is precise and deliberately manipulative. It suggests that there exists some fixed thing we can call “The Science,” like some Vatican religious dogma, whereas the real scientific method is one of continuous questioning, overturning past hypotheses with newly proven ones, adjusting.

Yet when it comes to “Science,” the handful of giant vaccine makers, sometimes known as Big Pharma, a cartel not unlike Big Oil, have a record of fraud, deliberate doctoring of their own tests, as well as widespread bribing of doctors and medical officials to promote their various drugs despite “Science” results that contradict their assertions of safety. A look at the major global pharmaceutical giants is instructive.

Johnson & Johnson

We begin with the Johnson & Johnson Company of New Jersey. On July 21, 2021 J&J and three other smaller drug makers agreed to pay a staggering $26 billion damages to a group of US states for their role in causing America’s opioid epidemic. Of that J&J will pay $5 billion. The CDC estimates that use of the highly-addictive opioids as painkillers caused at least 500,000 deaths between 1999 and 2019. Johnson & Johnson is accused of pushing the deadly painkillers for excessive use and downplaying their addiction risks. They knew better.

The same J&J is in a huge legal battle for knowingly using a carcinogen in its famous baby powder. A 2018 Reuters investigation found J&J knew for decades that asbestos, a known carcinogen, lurked in its baby powder and other cosmetic talc products. The company is reportedly considering legally splitting its baby powder division into a small separate company that would then declare bankruptcy to avoid large payouts. The J&J covid vaccine, unlike that from Pfizer and Moderna, does not use mRNA genetic alteration.

The two global covid vaccine makers which have by far the largest market to date are the two being personally promoted by Fauci. These are from Pfizer in alliance with the tiny German BioNTech company under the name Comirnaty, and from the US biotech Moderna.

Pfizer

Pfizer, one of the world’s largest vaccine makers by sales, was founded in 1849 in the USA. It also has one of the most criminal records of fraud, corruption, falsification and proven damage. A 2010 Canadian study noted, “Pfizer has been a “habitual offender,” persistently engaging in illegal and corrupt marketing practices, bribing physicians and suppressing adverse trial results.

That’s serious. Note that Pfizer has yet to make fully public details of its covid vaccine studies for external examination.

The list of Pfizer crimes has gotten longer since 2010. It is currently engaged in lawsuits related to charges its Zantac heartburn medication is contaminated with a cancer-causing substance. As well, Pfizer received the biggest drug-related fine in US history in 2009 as part of a $2.3 Billion plea deal for mis-promoting medicines Bextra and Celebrex and paying kickbacks to compliant doctors.

Pfizer pleaded guilty to the felony of marketing four drugs including Bextra “with the intent to defraud or mislead.” They were forced to withdraw their arthritis painkiller Bextra in the USA and EU for causing heart attacks, strokes, and serious skin disease.

Clearly in a move to boost revenue, Pfizer illegally paid doctors kickbacks for “off-label” use of more than one of its drug which resulted in patients being injured or killed. Among them were Bextra (valdecoxib); Geodon (ziprasidone HCl), an atypical antipsychotic; Zyvox (linezolid), an antibiotic; Lyrica (pregabalin), a seizure medication; its famous Viagra (sildenafil), an erectile dysfunction drug; and Lipitor (atorvastatin), a cholesterol drug.

In another court trial, Pfizer subsidiaries were forced to pay $142 million and release company documents that showed it was illegally marketing gabapentin for off-label use.

Data revealed in a string of U.S. lawsuits indicates the drug was promoted by the drug company as a treatment for pain, migraines and bipolar disorder – even though it wasn’t effective in treating these conditions and was actually toxic in certain cases, according to the Therapeutics Initiative, an independent drug research group at the University of British Columbia. The trials forced the company to release all of its studies on the drug, including the ones it kept hidden.

In 2004 Pfizer subsidiary Warner-Lambert was forced to pay $430 million to settle criminal charges and civil liability arising from its fraudulent marketing practices with respect to Neurontin, its brand for the drug gabapentin. Originally developed for the treatment of epilepsy, Neurontin was illegally promoted off-label for the treatment of neurological pain, and in particular for migraine and bipolar disorder – even though it wasn’t effective in treating these conditions and was actually toxic in some cases.

Neurontin for unapproved uses made up some 90 percent of the $2.7 billion in sales in 2003.

A New York Times report disclosed in 2010 that Pfizer “…paid about $20 million to 4,500 doctors and other medical professionals in the United States for consulting and speaking on its behalf in the last six months of 2009.” It paid another $15.3 million to 250 academic medical centers and other research groups for clinical trials. In the US legal practice it is seldom that corporate executives actually doing the criminal deeds are prosecuted.

The result is that court fines can be treated as “business costs” in this cynical milieu. In eight years of repeated malfeasance through 2009, Pfizer accumulated just under $3 billion in fines and civil penalties, about a third of one year’s net revenues.

In 2020 as its covid vaccine was in development, Pfizer paid $13,150,000 in lobbying Congress and officials in Washington among others. Also notable is the fact that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation own shares of both Pfizer and their partner in the leading mRNA vaccine, BioNTech of Germany.

Moderna

The third covid vaccine producer today with FDA Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) is Moderna of Cambridge, Massachusetts. It has yet to be sued for illegal practices unlike J&J or Pfizer. But that fact is likely only because before its EUA for its mRNA experimental vaccine, in its ten years existence since 2010 it had failed to get FDA approval to market a single medicine, despite repeated failed attempts. However Moderna has a red neon sign that reads “conflict of interest” that should give pause.

Moderna and Fauci’s NIAID have collaborated on development of vaccines using Moderna’s mRNA platform and NIAID of Fauci on coronaviruses including MERS, since at least November, 2015. On January 13, 2020, before the first case of a supposed Wuhan, China “novel coronavirus” was even detected in the United States, Fauci’s NIAID and Moderna signed an updated cooperation agreement which described them as co-owners of a mRNA based coronavirus and that they had finalized a sequence for mRNA-1273, the vaccine now being given to millions for supposedly averting the novel coronavirus.

That means that Fauci’s NIAID and perhaps Fauci personally (it’s allowed in the US) stood to reap huge financial benefits from emergency approval of the Moderna jab, yet Fauci has never admitted to the conflict publicly when he was Trump corona adviser, nor as Biden’s.

Ten days later on January 23, 2020 Moderna announced it was granted funding by CEPI, a vaccine fund created by Bill Gates’ foundation along with Davos World Economic Forum among others, to develop an mRNA vaccine for the Wuhan virus.

Moderna was created by a venture capitalist, Noubar Afeyan along with Harvard professor Timothy A. Springer, and others. In 2011 Afeyan recruited French businessman and former Eli Lilly executive Stephane Bancel as CEO of the new Moderna. Despite having no medical or science degree nor any experience running a drug development operation, Bancel lists himself as co-patent holder for a hundred patents of Moderna tied to the different vaccines.

Beginning in 2013 the tiny Moderna was receiving grants from the Pentagon to develop its mRNA technology. As of 2020 just prior to its receiving emergency use authorization from the US Government FDA, fully 89% of Moderna revenues were from US Government grants. This is hardly an experienced company yet it holds the fate of millions in its hands. As Fauci says, “Trust the Science.

In February 2016, an editorial in Nature magazine criticized Moderna for not publishing any peer-reviewed papers on its technology, unlike most other emerging and established biotech companies. The company remains ultra-secretive. That same year, 2016 Moderna got $20 million from the Gates Foundation for vaccine development using mRNA.

Up to its receiving EUA approval for its covid mRNA product in December 2020 Moderna had only made losses since its founding. Then curiously, following a March 2020 personal meeting with then-President Trump where Bancel told the president Moderna could have a vaccine ready in a matter of months Moderna luck changed.

On May 15, Trump announced creation of Operation Warp Seed to rollout a COVID-19 vaccine by December. The head of the Presidential group was a 30-year R&D veteran of the large UK drug firm GSK, Moncef Slaoui. In 2017 Slaoui had resigned from GSK and joined the board of none other than Moderna. Under Slaoui’s Warp Speed, some $22 billion of US taxpayer money was thrown at different vaccine makers. Moderna was a prime recipient, a brazen conflict of interest but nobody seemed to care.

Slaoui funneled some $2 billion in government funds to his old company, Moderna, to develop the mRNA covid vaccine. Only under public criticism did Slaoui sell his stock in Moderna, making millions in profit from Moderna’s role as a covid vaccine leading candidate. Shortly after resigning at the end of the Trump presidency, Slaoui was fired by his old firm GSK from a company subsidiary following charges of sexual harassment of a female employee.

In February 2020 Trump Secretary of Health and Human Services, Alex Azar, invoked the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP) to exempt Moderna, Pfizer, J&J and any future covid makers from any and all liability arising from damage or death caused by their vaccines for the Wuhan coronavirus. The legal protection lasts until 2024.

If the vaccines are so good and safe, why is such a measure needed?

Azar was former head of the US drug giant Eli Lilly. There are some serious questions that must be raised openly regarding the vaccine makers who are now pushing experimental highly controversial gene-edited formulations in human experiments.

See more here: journal-neo.org

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (9)

  • Avatar

    sir_isO

    |

    You really should trust the science, though.

    Like, for instance, you can passively observe that in winter people get RTIs. You can find many studies, references about why that is, regarding factors such as tryptophan, melatonin, serotonin, vitamin D, GcMAF. And those are only a few things related to sunlight.

    I can explain virus origins, they can’t.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      sir_isO

      |

      Other ways to trust the science in pharma…

      You can notice for instance that the IOM has RDI for vitamin D at around 600iu. Which is of course nowhere near enough in supplemental terms (if you don’t get good sunlight exposure).

      You can trust also, that while that is a known (intentional) generalized error, vitamin D deficiency is very common. But particularly in RTIs, heart problems, and older people.

      You can also trust the science, that if you sign up for a trial, marketing is marketing. You signed up for a trial. Now before you signed up for that trial, maybe you should’ve considered motivations, history of corruption, perhaps consider essential functions. I dunno, maybe go look at the side effects of some medicines. But you’re being used to establish that, though even that is a cover, to kinda just degenerate you for monetary profit and control.

      Go look at the science of why old, sickly people with accumulated toxicity, decades of degeneration…are “superspreaders” and yet, children are not (and also not sick).

      Go look at the science of why, when you are anywhere near a hospital or clinic, you don’t constantly catch these contagious diseases (assuming you are not actually admitted and subjected to their iatrogenic deathcult practices). Hundreds, if not thousands of them, if you consider all the “variants”.

      I can walk through a hall of old, sick “covid positive” people and never get sick from them. And I won’t even wear a mask. Shit, I’ll even do it naked so as to lower “healthcare costs”, and cause a few extra heart attacks.

      Remember Florence Nightingale…or maybe any doctors, nurses ever?

      You know, like that time they even tried to inject people with “h1n1 infections” and it didn’t do shit.

      Reply

  • Avatar

    Alan

    |

    There is a problem with Big Pharma, but what concerns me more is that the politicians we elect to serve and protect us are not doing their job. The believe every word of “experts” who promote fear and urgent action, as we have also seen with climate science. More importantly, we cannot trust our GPs and other health professional to assess the situation independently of the government. They are also heavily promoting the “vaccines”. Then bringing this all together to generate more fear we have the media,

    Reply

    • Avatar

      sir_isO

      |

      The modern medical principles, are derived from industrial motivations. Pasteur methodology, viruses, conflations, results as causes. Your politicians are their whores.

      Reply

    • Avatar

      sir_isO

      |

      “There is a problem with Big Pharma, but what concerns me more is that the politicians we elect to serve and protect us are not doing their job.”

      Regarding that, why do you think parasitic industrial profiteers that try to impose on you, steal from you and require your support would be doing anything other than their jobs?

      That’s a misconception people often have, voting for industrial fascists predicated on those principles, thinking those fascists are going to respect them. They’ll protect you, as constituents, while you are led to slaughter to be fed to the bowels of mammon because that is their job. Don’t misunderstand them, they souled out. The want to take you with them.

      Luckily, I’ve never voted. Because you see, I don’t believe in delegating to ignorant, malicious, sociopsychopathetic industrial corporate state fascists and such.

      Unfortunately, that means the vast majority of people I could even potentially associate with, I cannot associate with as they DID go and legitimize that bullshit on their behalf.

      And I’m not even particularly respectable. So it’s pretty bad.

      Reply

  • Avatar

    tom0mason

    |

    As far as I can see Big Pharma is only in the market to make big profits.
    Big Pharma does not wish to come up with medications that cure people of what ails them, they wish that everyone is on a lifetime of their drug therapies. Therapies that (at best) ameliorate the symptoms (real or imagined) but could, and all too often do, cause many other deleterious effects.
    The bribing doctors and consultants for ‘off license’ use of medications does appear to be Big Pharma trying to push the use of a “Soma-like” all-purpose drug that was featured in Aldous Huxley’s 1932 novel ‘Brave New World’.
    “Trust the Science” or Big Pharma’s version of it, and be dependent on their highly profitable drugs for the rest of your life.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Linden

    |

    Trust pharma? Ruled by science? Pharma nowadays is ruled by one thing only. MONEY.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      sir_isO

      |

      I suggest it’s simpler than even money.

      Insecurity (which is related to the greed, imposition, possessiveness, etc). And it’s not quite just “pharma nowadays”, since the pharma principles haven’t changed much (other than becoming predictably more degenerate) since at least more than a century ago.

      That insecurity, is manifested in the pharma psyche as a “need” to degenerate.

      Reply

  • Avatar

    sir_isO

    |

    My experience with pharma is such that if you told me (truthfully) right now that I’m going to die within the next 15 minutes unless I get to one of those “healthcare” institutions and use pharma shit…I’d comfortably reject the association with them.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via