Why pigeons mean peril for satellite broadband
“It’s actually been very good but I noticed a series of outages – some a second, some longer,” says Prof Alan Woodward.
The University of Surrey cyber-security expert is talking about his new satellite broadband service from space entrepreneur Elon Musk’s Starlink company.
The outages, he thinks, may be caused by a lot of “pesky pigeons”, which “have taken a fancy to sitting on the dish”.
That small grey dish sits on the kitchen roof. To the curious pigeon, it might conceivably look like a modern bird bath rather short on water.
Image: Alan Woodward / BBC
It is one earthbound end of the Starlink satellite internet system.
Living in a place where he “can only dream” of a fibre broadband connection, Prof Woodward says he’s pleased to be one of the beta testers of the low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite broadband system,
Mr Musk recently announced that he has shipped 100,000 of the terminals.
The little dish receives and sends signals to passing satellites, part of a constellation of 1,700 which are hurtling overhead at a height of about 340 miles (550km). They travel fast enough to orbit the Earth every 90 minutes or so.
Tens of thousands more are planned, but Gwynne Shotwell, president of aerospace company SpaceX which operates Starlink, has admitted new launches are being affected by shortages of chips and liquid oxygen fuel.
Treating Covid-19 patients has increased demand for commercial oxygen – leaving less for fuel.
Major outage
Prof Woodward is still investigating the root cause of the glitches, though an expert told the BBC a “pigeon sitting on a Starlink antenna would certainly degrade its performance”.
Pigeons have not been the only problem, however, as this week, a major outage hit Starlink users around the world. The connection, Prof Woodward said, “just completely disappeared”.
The service, still officially in beta, seems to have been down for about an hour for many users – and Starlink has not explained why.
Image: ROSCOSMOS PRESS OFFICE
Starlink is one of a number of firms hoping to provide satellite internet services.
- Amazon’s Project Kuiper plans to launch a constellation of 3,236 satellites
- Telesat, a Canadian company, says it will put 298 satellites in orbit
- The EU has plans for a mega-constellation
- China has also announced plans for its own network
And then there’s OneWeb, part-owned by the UK taxpayer, which, like Starlink, already has hardware in space.
The firm launched 34 satellites this week, meaning there are now 288 of the 150kg objects in space.
OneWeb’s focus is on providing internet to businesses, maritime users and government. However, a deal with BT means it will probably also supply consumer broadband to rural areas, including portable 5G cells which customers could hire “on demand”.
Many people in remote areas may end up receiving broadband via satellite, whether or not they realise it.
“The technology may be invisible to the end user,” says Mike Thompson, director for technical development for consultants Access Partnership.
“The provider may run a satellite link in a town where fibre is unavailable, for example, and use it to feed the local broadband pipe.”
How much?
All of this comes at a cost.
“The price is on the high side. It’s about £500 to get the equipment as a beta tester, and then £89 per month,” Prof Woodward tells me.
That price is still much less than the cost of manufacture and Starlink’s Gwynne Shotwell has said that terminals shipped later in the year are expected to cost roughly half as much to produce.
But its not clear if or when these savings will be passed on to consumers.
However, at least Prof Woodward has found Starlink easy to use.
“I popped it on the kitchen roof primarily because it was the only flat roof and easy to get to. Starlink provide an app that shows if there are obstructions so you can choose the best spot, which saved hours of fiddling around.”
After connecting it to the router, he said, the dish “juggled around for a minute or so. Then I had fast internet”.
The speeds are averaging about 150-200 megabits per second (Mbps) download speeds and 10-20Mbps upload. There were short dropouts, but nothing that would have interrupted, for example, streaming television, Prof Woodward said.
“That knocks anything else I can obtain here into a cocked hat,” he said.
Image: Alan Woodward / BBC
In February, Mr Musk tweeted that Starlink hoped to double its offered top speeds to 300Mbps.
But the kind of service that users will experience via LEO satellites will depend on many factors.
One, experts say, will be how many other dishes are nearby. Starlink currently limits the number of users per coverage area.
Prof Michael Fitch, from the University of Surrey says not very many users can have the top speed at the same time in a given area.
“The average bit-rate that individual users experience will reduce as the number of nearby users increases, since the system has a finite capacity that it can provide over any given area”
The amount of reduction will depend on a number of things including “how well the system can move capacity from one area to another”, he says.
Regulator Ofcom recently raised concerns about interference between satellite systems potentially causing dropouts, but Prof Fitch says it is “unlikely to be serious”.
Others take a different view.
“In general, a slow but reliable internet connection is more useful than a fast but intermittent one,” says Mr Thompson. “Interactive applications (like video conferencing) require a continuous connection.”
Image: Getty Images
Crowded skies
LEO is an increasingly busy place, and astronomers have already complained about the trails of satellites spoiling their observations.
But others worry about collisions.
“We are already beginning to see a large number of near misses in orbit involving Starlink,” says Prof Hugh Lewis of University of Southampton,
He warns that stopping collisions between so many satellite constellations “may soon go beyond what humans or simple algorithms can safely manage”.
He says more advanced technological solutions may be needed to keep spacecraft safe.
How many satellites end up orbiting earth will in part depend on demand for their broadband services.
For Prof Woodward, Starlink was an expensive but pleasantly surprising new purchase.
After a couple of days of use, he said: “I was dubious about how good it would be considering it’s receiving signals from objects hurtling past you in low earth orbit.
“But the whole experience has left me feeling optimistic.”
Whether he will continue to feel that way may depend on how the technology develops, and of course pigeons.
See more here: bbc.co.uk
Header image: Getty Images
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Guido FORRIER
| #
[email protected]
all what we shoot in orbit around the world will come down , where ? and with what damage ? and for what ? internet in de Gobi desert ?
Reply
slandermen
| #
Yeah, ask the morons about the “mysterious” animal deaths. No “pathogens” associated, sudden, mysterious illness and death, also consistent with EMF damage.
Reply
slandermen
| #
I personally dealt with two pigeons, btw, that “mysteriously” got ill VERY suddenly, and they had shared food, water.
But the two that did get ill (and came back retarded, completely ruined) were elsewhere before right before they got sick, no disease spread and I handled both those pigeons (since apparently I tame wild pigeons).
Here’s a video of one of them, after I “nursed” it. It was super sickly, like, within hours. Brain damaged, vision loss, poor balance, etc.
Here’s the sort of neurological damage caused by EMF, nearly instantly:
https://bucket.growdiaries.com/static/post/video/87897/90161_grow-journal-by-sir-isocustomquantum-hack-codes_cnv.mp4
Reply
slandermen
| #
Reread that title.
“Why pigeons mean peril for satellite broadband”
Meaning, when pigeons are involved, peril (of the pigeons) is involved because of satellite broadband, for instance.
Reply
slandermen
| #
Have fun:
https://thefullertoninformer.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/cia-millimeter-waves-1.pdf
It’s a CIA translation of a russian MMW document.
Reply
slandermen
| #
Some of the first things it starts off with is noting arterial pressure (which’d be related to oxidative stress, blood clotting, and various other things) increases.
Reply
slandermen
| #
Vaguely speaking, inflammation.
Reply
slandermen
| #
That sort of thing is associated with HSP related responses, DNA truncations, breaks to RNA, misfolded proteins and other common virus/prion/cancer causation processes.
Reply
slandermen
| #
Oh and just you think it stops there…
Bacterial and fungal propagation (resulting from body, or medium, essentially) can be stimulated with EMF too.
slandermen
| #
http://ijomeh.eu/Mobile-phone-use-and-risk-for-intracranial-tumors-and-salivary-gland-tumors-A-meta-analysis,63713,0,2.html
“Twenty four studies (26 846 cases, 50 013 controls) were included into the meta-analysis. A significantly higher risk of an intracranial tumor (all types) was noted for the period of mobile phone use over 10 years (odds ratio (OR) = 1.324, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.028–1.704), and for the ipsilateral location (OR = 1.249, 95% CI: 1.022–1.526). The results support the hypothesis that long-term use of mobile phone increases risk of intracranial tumors, especially in the case of ipsilateral exposure. Further studies are needed to confirm this relationship.”
Consider that the EMF is like “unwanted exercise”, cellularly. That causes inflammatory responses, arterial pressure for example, genetic damage, constant energy waste, nutrient depletion.
Reply
slandermen
| #
That means, there’s significantly more brain cancer associated with cellphone use associated, depending on which side of the head the cellphone is mostly position.
Unsurprisingly, there’s also significant data to suggest that cancers in the groin area and cellphone use is associated.
Coz most people have their cellphones in their pockets, or in their faces/by the side of their heads.
The usage for those sort of phones in the study (considering it’s a 10 year study) would be of course, less typically modern smartphone oriented. Meaning, where people held the phones to either side of their head.
With more modern usage, it’s gonna be more central brain damage.
Reply
Howdy
| #
Women will carry their phone in their bra. This has been implicated in breast cancer.
Reply
Howdy
| #
I don’t suppose one could use some anti-pigeon measures? Simply make the dish an unattractive perch by attaching a few cable ties or similar around It’s periphery for example.
Reply