The Iran War: A Planned Dismantling Of The Global Energy System?

The system you were taught to rely on has turned hostile. And its architects view you not as a citizen, but as a liability to be managed or eliminated

Let’s talk about something no one in the mainstream is connecting—but the dots are already there, waiting to be drawn.

Remember March 2020?

The world shut down overnight. Businesses closed. Travel stopped. Governments seized unprecedented control over daily life—all in the name of a manufactured “pandemic.”

Now, as energy infrastructure burns across the Middle East and the Strait of Hormuz sits effectively closed, we’re watching the setup for something eerily familiar. But it’s not just energy.

In the background, AI data centers are quietly consuming billions of gallons of water—draining communities to cool the machines that will soon be used to monitor and manage us.

Call it Energy Lockdown 2.0

And this time, it won’t be framed as a temporary emergency measure. It will be sold as a necessary, permanent restructuring of how we live—all to “save the planet” and “manage scarcity.”

But here’s what they’re not telling you: The scarcity is engineered. The crisis is manufactured. And control is the aim.

As Mike Adams of Natural News recently warned, we are witnessing “the methodical setup for a national lockdown of movement, food, and fuel”—a deliberate pattern designed to manufacture a crisis so extreme that the public will accept measures once unthinkable in a free society.

But how exactly does that lockdown get engineered?

Adams lays it out plainly:

“AI data centers compete with humans for three critical resources: 1) Land, 2) Water, and 3) Electricity. Humans need land to grow food, but data centers need land for solar power and facilities. Those same data centers consume water during evaporative cooling operations, and they are extremely hungry for kWh of power. Over time, humans will be displaced as AI research is prioritized on a national security basis.”

This isn’t a bug. It’s the design.

The Iran War: A Trigger, Not an Accident

Let’s be clear about what’s happening right now.

The war with Iran has already caused catastrophic damage to global energy infrastructure. But was this a geopolitical miscalculation? Or was this a deliberate trigger pulled on the global economy’s most critical artery: the Strait of Hormuz?

Either way, the results are exactly what you’d expect when you set fire to the world’s fuel supply chain.

The crown jewel of the damage is Qatar’s Ras Laffan LNG complex, the largest liquefied natural gas facility on the planet. Iranian missile strikes took out two liquefaction trains—Trains 4 and 6, with a combined capacity of 12.8 million tonnes per year.

That’s 17% of Qatar’s total LNG export capacity gone in a single strike, with repairs expected to take three to five years and annual revenue losses estimated at $20 billion.

QatarEnergy has already declared force majeure on contracts with China, Italy, Belgium, and South Korea—legal jargon for “we can’t deliver, and you can’t sue us.” Shell’s Pearl GTL facility? Also hit.

One of its production trains is expected to remain offline for at least a year.

Meanwhile, the United Arab Emirates is bleeding oil. State giant ADNOC has been forced to implement widespread production shut-ins, with all offshore fields now offline.

Total UAE output is down more than 50%. The port of Fujairah, a major oil bunkering and storage hub, has been repeatedly targeted by drone attacks, suspending operations.

And then there’s the Strait itself. Normally, 20% of the world’s oil supply and 20% of its LNG flow through this 21-mile-wide channel. Right now? It’s effectively closed to allied shipping.

The UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization reports that traffic through the Strait has collapsed by 90%. Combined output cuts across the Middle East now stand at 7 to 10 million barrels per day—that’s seven to ten percent of global demand.

The International Energy Agency’s Fatih Birol called it the biggest energy crisis in history, bigger even than the oil shocks of 1973 and 1979.

This isn’t just a regional conflict. This is a deliberate dismantling of the global energy system.

And if you think the pain stops at the fuel pump, you haven’t been paying attention. Energy isn’t just what moves your car—it’s what grows your food.

Here’s the chain they don’t want you to trace. Natural gas is the primary feedstock for ammonia, and ammonia is the backbone of nitrogen fertilizer.

No gas, no fertilizer. No fertilizer, no food.

That much has been widely reported. But there’s another chain, equally vital and far less discussed: sulfur.

Sulfur is the essential ingredient for producing sulfuric acid, which is used to process phosphate rock into phosphate fertilizer—the other half of the global fertilizer equation.

Without sulfur, phosphate fertilizers grind to a halt. And where does nearly half of the world’s sulfur come from? The Gulf region. The same Gulf region whose ports are now inaccessible, whose shipping lanes are now war zones.

The FAO’s chief economist, Máximo Torero, spelled this out plainly at a UN press briefing on March 26:

“The Gulf region accounts for nearly half of global sulfur trade, a critical input used to produce sulfuric acid for processing phosphate rock into fertilizers. Disruptions to sulfur supply risk fracturing global phosphate fertilizer production, including in major producing countries.”

Now, let’s connect the dots

  • Natural gas crisis → nitrogen fertilizer production collapses (ammonia)
  • Sulfur crisis → phosphate fertilizer production collapses (sulfuric acid)
  • Combined → both legs of the global fertilizer system are simultaneously fracturing

Goldman Sachs reports that nitrogen fertilizer prices have already jumped 40% since the conflict began.

The UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization warns that global fertilizer prices could average 15 to 20 percent higher in the first half of 2026 if the crisis persists.

Food prices are spiking globally—and if this disruption continues for three to six months, we’re looking at a full-blown global food security catastrophe.

They didn’t just cut off your gasoline. They cut off your dinner.

And they made sure the fertilizer couldn’t reach the farm, either.

See more here substack.com

Bold emphasis added

Header image: NBC News

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

Comments (3)

  • Avatar

    Tom

    |

    Cool…A/i will be running on double A batteries.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    very old white guy

    |

    Just what would be the point of making it difficult if not impossible to use energy globally? If money is the reason for all commerce and manufacturing the fewer people there are the less that is needed, therefore less wealth being created for anyone. No food, well who the heck benefits from that?

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Seriously

      |

      I’ve had this very thought…and wondered as well. My hypothesis is…taking out the old guard…the wealth built on oil, transportation cannot be removed without crippling it. World economy has relied on these 2 things, growing exponentially as the population increases and straps back to everything from necessary commodities to luxury items…and has created most of the wealth, within very few individuals, corporations. Global Warming was the beginning salvo.
      Tech advance brought ‘information ‘ into this juggernaut as a new wealth building tool- think surveillance, bitcoin, paper, (money that is only ever worth what the market says it is…it’s not real in any sense of the word, such as gold (that’s why they killed the gold standard), yet it rules the planet anyway. Basically, create more wealth on vapor.Tech however, provides an added bonus: total control of the population.
      So, what happens when they have control over all – over how much energy you use, over your ability to travel, over your ability to produce for your own benefit (i.e., create your own profiable and stable business)
      over your bank accounts – the how and when you decide to spend…where is the profit? What is the point?
      I know I began asking in 2008…as a person with zero economic education or stock market knowledge, I could see what would happen.. so why did they let it? The only gain, to anyone, was sequestration of more wealth. I remember thinking ‘what is the end game?’. We were doing everything they asked – buying things we didn’t need, on credit we couldn’t afford, with money we could never hope to clear debt and save for retirement -and creating a fabulous credit market – gains to wealth just for being late on payments, opening new cards when others exhausted.
      I have always said that capitalism has to collapse, some day as a system….simply because of greed. It appears that the corporations, from the 1970’s on, want every single bit of all wealth – control of every dollar or whatever currency is out there. Think all the mom and pop stores selling hardware ( home depot etc al) – most are gone…the ones selling any commodity that was useful to human existence – food, shelter, clothing, appliances, vehicles, repair…all gone for the most part in favor of huge conglomerates and corporations that rule that space now… and I see their moving into new markets. Think about corporations buying up properties for airbnb, etc? Insurance now to cover your car repairs, your home repairs. They’re going after markets untouched in the past. By doing this they have the middle class in it’s death throws
      But then what? A globe of slaves? That is total control. That is the end game I see. Are they just insane, these overlords of industry?
      What does it profit a man to gain the world if he loses his profit in so doing??

      Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via
Share via