Why Ethical Cardiologists Cannot Support COVID-19 Vaccination

I was given this exclusive footage of a major upcoming film where I was able to outline why as an ethical and concerned cardiologist, I cannot support COVID-19 vaccination

The chain of logic is solid. From October, 22, 2020 forward, The US government agencies said the mRNA vaccines would cause myocarditis or heart damage.

They have been correct and the problem has greatly increased the burden of heart disease worldwide, particularly among young persons.

Here is the list of potential adverse events after Covid ‘vaccination’, produced by the FDA on October 22nd, 2020.

They knew all this, and still recommended the entire US population be ‘vaccinated’.

Cardiovascular death was elevated in the original Pfizer mRNA COVID-19 vaccine randomized trials.

No product should be FDA EUA authorized let alone supported by the American College of Cardiology when it is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death as shown by Michels et al.

COVID-19 vaccine myocarditis is leading to autopsy proven fatal cardiac arrests. Based on the analysis of Hulscher et al, the next cardiac arrest that occurs in a young person and the COVID-19 vaccine is not ruled out, the public should consider subclinical myocarditis as the likely cause of the death.

See more here substack.com

Bold emphasis added

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About Covid 19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (3)

  • Avatar

    Tom

    |

    It was and still is murder in plain sight using any definition or data you can dig up. There is no other purpose for the existence of mRNA substances of any kind. They do nothing to secure a healthier disposition or increase any chance of a positive health outcome.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Saeed Qureshi

    |

    Interesting!
    Now, there are two types of cardiologists: ethical and unethical. I thought once they got their “certificate” to practice, everyone would become champions of ethical practice. Does this classification apply to those who believe in a nonexistent virus and recommend treatment for a misdiagnosed illness?

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via