Why Are Hospital Workers So Afraid Of The Vaccine?

Across the country hospital administrators are facing unexpected push-back from employees on the issue of the covid vaccine. More and more are refusing to take it, with at least one hospital CEO mentioning “mistrust” and fear. Why?


Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method

Trackback from your site.

Comments (6)

  • Avatar

    Carl

    |

    “Why Are Hospital Workers So Afraid Of The Vaccine?”

    This is worded wrong. It should be “Why do so many hospital workers MISTRUST the vaccine?

    Mistrust and fear are two very different realities. I don’t lend money to strangers because I fear them; I don’t lend money to strangers because I don’t randomly trust people that I don’t know. Very few people know what is actually in that syringe. Are you going to let some stranger inject some unknown substance into your body just because some government agency says it “safe”?

    Before retirement I was a hospital worker and we were encouraged to get the yearly flue vaccine. The last one that I got put me in bed sick for three days and I can’t imagine that actually catching the flue would have been any worse.

    Also, hospital workers are not naive about the safety of medical care. After all, at a rate of ~251,000 deaths per year medical errors are one of the leading causes of death in the United States (NIH-National Library of Medicine.) Good intentions do not = safe treatment. No matter how well intentioned it may be to produce a vaccine at “Warp Speed” (a science fiction term by the way), there are good reasons why it takes years to produce a “safe” vaccine.

    Also, if vaccines are so safe why the need for this law? “No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988 . . .” 42 U.S. Code § 300aa–22 – Standards of responsibility

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Jerry Krause

    |

    Hi Carl,

    You wrote: “Before retirement I was a hospital worker and we were encouraged to get the yearly flue vaccine. The last one that I got put me in bed sick for three days and I can’t imagine that actually catching the flue would have been any worse.”

    I have read the sometimes that the ‘flue vaccine’ about you wrote is only about 30% effective. Which I believed and no longer had this seasonal flue shot. I ask you, as an experienced hospital worker, can I conclude from this 30% statement that 70% of those receiving this flue shot do get the flue?

    Given this 30% number, does the statist exist as to the percentage of the ‘control group’ who have NOT gotten a flue shot and have NOT gotten the flue that season?

    Now that I have thought of these questions, I consider them to be very fundamental and critically important as to what the ‘factual’ (observed) answers might be.

    Have a good day, Jerry.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Russ Littler

      |

      Your own immune system is 99.98% efficient in seeing off any virus. Why would you want a vaccine?

      Reply

  • Avatar

    Chris

    |

    They’re afraid because their training tells them that covid19 is a hoax and that a vaccine for corona viruses have always failed. This one didn’t go through normal safety protocols. They expect this vax to fail so they told the gov that they needed to be indemnified before they would release the product.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Carl

    |

    “I have read the sometimes that the ‘flue vaccine’ about you wrote is only about 30% effective. Which I believed and no longer had this seasonal flue shot. I ask you, as an experienced hospital worker, can I conclude from this 30% statement that 70% of those receiving this flue shot do get the flue?”

    Typically they rate the “effectiveness” of the flu vaccine by comparing the number of flu cases that are caught by vaccinated people vs. unvaccinated people. For example, if in a particular year if there are 100 cases of flu among unvaccinated people but only 70 cases of flu among vaccinated people, they will say that the vaccination reduced your chances of catching the flu by 30%–it was 30% effective.

    The fact is the vast majority of people, whether vaccinated or not, don’t get the seasonal flu. According to the CDC during the 2018-19 flu season for example:
    % of people not vaccinated who got the flu = 14% (~23.4 million)
    % of people vaccinated who got the flu = 7% (~11.7 million)

    Thus in that flu season the flu vaccine was said to be 40-60% “effective”. It supposedly reduced your chances of getting the seasonal flu by ~50%.

    Be aware that much of this is speculation because around half of those who supposedly had the flu in 2018-19 didn’t seek medical attention and therefore generated no paperwork that could be studied scientifically.

    Also in 2018-19, per the CDC itself (https://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/weeklyarchives2018-2019/Week39.htm), during the 2018-19 flu season only 200,654 people were actually tested for the flu and of those only 2.7% (or 5,320) tested positive!

    Did you catch that? The CDC reported that some 35.5 million people caught the flu in 2018-19 yet <6,000 of those cases were confirmed by an actual test. The other 35,494,680 cases of flu were diagnosed via symptoms. Its called “influenza-like illness” (ILI). ILI is defined as a fever of at least 100F, a cough and/or a sore throat. Thus everyone and anyone who had a slight fever, cough and a sore throat in 2018-19 were said to have had the flu. How is ILI different from the common cold? You tell me.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Jerry Krause

    |

    Hi Carl,

    Thank you very much for this information!!!

    Just last night I was trying to convince my wife of that of your last paragraph. But I did not have any information, my ‘argument’ was 35 million was a big number and 300 million ever a bigger number. And I doubt the 200,654 people tested were randomly selected from people walking along a sidewalk.
    Again I have no idea how these 200,654 people were selected to be tested.

    Thanks again!!!

    Have a good day, Jerry

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via