WEF Suggests Seniors Euthanise Themselves “For the Children”
The globalist World Economic Forum is now suggesting that older people consider euthanasia “for the children” and to ‘save the planet’.
In a video seen on Twitter full of geriatrics saying they’ve had a good life after explaining there’s too many humans on the planet.
The video suggests that elderly folks who no longer are productive should opt for euthanasia.
I’m certain children all over the world are thankful their grandparents will be suggested to off themselves for their benefit.
And while it is couched in “for the children” narrative, the truth of the matter is much more sinister.
Christina Lagarde of the International Monetary Fund has been quoted as saying, “Old people live too long and this is a risk for the global community.”
What Christine is saying in effect is, unless you are a productive member of society your entire life, you don’t deserve to live. Christine, with her white hair, manicured nails, and designer clothing probably never worked a manual job a day in her life.
She would like to tell our senior citizens who defended this country, grew our food, built machines and trucks, mined coal, drilled oil, and worked on the railroad that now that they are no longer useful, they should just die.
It is psychopathy to look at a person who has worked 30, 40, 50, and sometimes even 60 years, at the end of their life when they should be enjoying the twilight hours left for them and tell them they just need to die because they are a drain on the global community.
How have we allowed these people to get so far so fast to attack our most vulnerable?
40 plus years ago when they allowed abortion to kill the most innocent among us, many people said it would eventually end up to terminating the elderly as well. There were lots of handwaving and dismissal of that argument.
However, 40 plus years on, we see that that is exactly what they are planning on doing.
This, after a worldwide pandemic from a bioweapon produced by our own government within China which targeted specifically, it seems, the elderly and infirmed. They now want senior individuals who no longer “produce” enough to justify their life to opt for euthanasia.
You know what you can’t quantify when it comes to production by an elderly person?
You cannot quantify the knowledge that they have acquired over a lifetime.
You can’t quantify the cookies they bake and give to the neighborhood children every summer.
You can’t quantify how much a grandmother does by watching her grandchildren so that her single daughter can produce money to take care of those children.
You can’t quantify the number of times they call their adult daughter or son and ask if they’re OK.
You can’t quantify the number of hours that they volunteer at the hospital directing people and helping people to their cars.
You can’t quantify how many hours they spent handing out food at a food bank.
You can’t quantify the number of Christmases and how productive that was for their family due to a boost in morale.
You can’t quantify the production of an elderly person because most of their production is done outside of the economy.
By discounting the things that they do because they aren’t paid a dollar for it you are discounting humanity completely.
It is an inhumane and an unjust disgusting affront to humanity that the World Economic Forum doesn’t value our seniors who no longer earn a paycheck but still contribute to the greater economy in ways that can’t be counted.
See more here: trendingpolitics.com
Header image: Youtube
Bold emphasis added
Editor’s note: It is interesting to note most of those advocating population reduction and euthanasia for older people are older people themselves, but we never see them leading by example.
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
VOWG
| #
I suggest they are the first to do that.
Reply
Alan
| #
A few days ago I read the opposite – that children should be killed for body parts to enable the elderly to live longer. The world has gone completely insane.
I’m more inclined to go with the elderly living too long. It is fine if we are fit and heathy but many end up in care homes with no quality of life. Nobody I know wants to end up in one and the only way to avoid it is timely suicide. This situation has developed because of health care keeping the elderly alive in a poor state of health. All, I suspect, to provide income to the Big Pharma. I remember in the 1960’s when my grandparents died, they just became suddenly ill and were obviously dying. They remained at home cared for by the family for about two weeks until they died. When they died the coffin was brought to the house and it only left for the funeral. There was no final indignity of a post mortem. We had good deaths then, if it can be described as that, compared to the misery the health care system creates today.
Reply
Andy
| #
Well said Alan!
Reply
Sharmin Proctor
| #
Your absolutely insane.. no one should be killed young or old.. both have so much to give.. and they are human.. you don’t just kill people at any age..because some control freak wants to cut down on population in any manner they can….these insane evil people have no right to tell someone they are worthless and to end their life.. it’s murder and the Bible says that if you have one sin in your life you cannot enter the kingdom of God! Satan is trying to destroy as many people as he can so they will not have a saving knowledge of Jesus. .. and he doesn’t care how he does it .. anyone advocating for this is taking part in is deceptive dark plan.. God forbid this wickedness!!
Reply
Mark Tapley
| #
This hypocritical posturing by the same elite parasites that live off the productivity of real workers in a real economy goes back the Club of Rome’s front man and phony “Earth Day” guru Paul Erlich, who although is now an advanced geriatric has not volunteered to stop sucking air to set an example of population reduction. The antiquated notion of over population being recycled again by the Zionist cabal only shows either how desperate they are or how gullible the public is when it is a given that the world’s population will soon begin a steady reduction and sharp decline.
It should be no surprise however to anyone that this siren song of the Eugenicist clique is still being heard everywhere for the termination of the old. After all what can be said of a society that not only allows but encourages the murder of the unborn and even just born as a matter of choice.
Reply
Geraint HUghes
| #
We should start with all climate crisis lunatics and anyone whom believes in 57 genders, then follow up with murderous criminals, gangsters and terrorists. With these people gone from the world, the world would be a very fine place indeed.
Reply
Kevin Doyle
| #
I would agree with the Editor’s Note comment.
Christina Lagarde should leed by example…
Reply
Andy
| #
Thanks Kevin, John O’Sullivan gave me the go-ahead to make sarcastic comments like that 🙂
Reply
Helge Aspevik
| #
I do not buy this one….
Reply
Tom
| #
Wait a minute. It’s the WEF that HATES ALL CHILDREN! They support abortion and using mRNA gene therapy injections to murder younger people. They want full power to murder millions in a population elimination scheme. Will these bastards take their own lives when they are old? Heck no. Come get me spineless parasites…I’m gonna live another 30 years.
Reply
Tom O
| #
Actually, Tom, you’re wrong. They don’t hate all children, just the children of those that don’t belong to their group. Just like they don’t hate all “old” people, just those that aren’t in the elitist class.
I haven’t figured out the correct age to which people have a right to live to as yet, but I think you are allowed to live to 75 if your estate is less than $1,000,000, and for every $10,000,000 over that, you can add an extra year. Thus if you have an estate that would be worth, say, $50 million, you should consider euthanasia at about 78. If you are a billionaire, well, of course you can live as long as you can find the organ transplants to support you because, after all, you are special. And those organs? If they have to come from a living person that also needs them, well to bad for that person.
Reply
Mark Tapley
| #
Hello Tom O:
There is no fountain of youth for the parasitic elite. Just look at Eugenicist Gates. He looks every bit of his 66 years. Organ transplants are only a last resort that often just create more problems. The Zionist elite already control most of the wealth because they control not only all the governments of any consequence but also the central banking cartel that controls the debt monetization.
Population control is as all about livestock management on the global plantation. The smaller the herd the easier it is to track and the easier it is to manage. Elite member and fellow founder of the Fabian Society, Bernard Shaw stated way back that the great majority of people were just “useless eaters.” Of course that never includes the elite families no matter what their age or mental faculties may be.
Reply
Dan
| #
Well, Klaus. You’re 84. Lead the way, assh_le.
Reply