Watch out! The Climate Zealots are Running Hot
We thought President Donald Trump was merely another Hitler. But, no, he’s also another Mao and another Stalin. Next, he’ll be on his way to becoming Beelzebub himself, unless the climate fanatics can finally get a hold of themselves. [emphasis, links added]
In one of the more maniacal rants we have seen, Rep. Sean Casten, an Illinois Democrat, swore before hundreds of millions that the administration’s dropping of the Obama-era Environmental Protection Agency’s carbon dioxide endangerment finding is an act of mass murder.
Seems to be a lot to put on an administrative order that reverses the EPA’s ability to regulate CO2, which provided the government with the veneer of “science” to pursue its EVs-for-all, gasoline-for-none crusade, to promote unreliable renewable energy sources, and to attack conventional energy suppliers and micromanage consumer appliance manufacturing.
“This is anti-scientific, immoral, and economically irresponsible. I say this without hyperbole – when the history of this era is written, Donald Trump will have been responsible for more deaths than Stalin, Mao and Hitler combined,” Casten said last week in a particularly frothy tweet.
That would be quite a number, maybe as high as 100 million. But even if only a little more than half that, as some have calculated, it’s still a staggering sum.
As if he didn’t expose himself enough, Casten added that he’s sure “Millions, if not billions, will die if we don’t address climate change; some will survive, but if rivers keep moving, coasts keep eroding, fires keep burning, we will be forced to become migratory. That is a choice.”
Though it’s clearly loco, Casten’s claim is not an isolated incident.
In a somewhat more measured but nonetheless irrational outburst, the author of the not-to-be-believed hockey stick chart, Michael Mann, declared that: “Not since Stalin and Soviet Lysenkoism have we seen such a brazen effort to misrepresent science in service of an ideological agenda.”
Just another case of psychological projection, in which the climate zealots are accusing skeptics of using the methods they employ.
But the climatistas’ madness is more threatening than a break with reality.
A few months ago, Mann wrote that if Trump didn’t comply with a federal injunction to stop the abolishment of the Education Department, “we’re in second amendment territory.”
Read rest at Issues & Insights
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Aaron
| #
Both ‘sides’ are insane narcissistic psychopathic puppet clowns
Reply
Len Winokur
| #
Maybe, but if Trump’s move proves to be the beginning of the end of all the ‘climate change’ lunacy, then that is what counts.
Reply
Lorraine
| #
The key to President Trump’s success in many areas of endeavor is that he is making common sense great again.
It’s now a good thing to question the “experts” and arrive at conclusions that make sense rather than follow like lemmings over the cliff.
Reply
Aaron
| #
both ‘sides’ are lemmings, watch out for that cliff!
Dem, Rep no difference
stomp stomp stomp
Reply
Seriously
| #
Nice sentiment…but that’s all it is. Next administration can change any changes right back…our lovely 2 party system that ensures we will always be at war with each other – the base at all arguments ( base is the only thing that counts – Everything else, smoke and mirrors)…the Civil War never ended people! That’s what politics ensures… we have the right to change our government…but we never will…too busy arguing along our personal confirmation bias prisons
Reply
upchuck.liberals
| #
I’m so confused. The elites want to eliminate a few billion, Trump, according to them are going to help them out and yet. Here they are whining about our little piddling addition to the horrible CO@ is going to maybe perhaps sort of help out the dreams of the elite. Or, most likely….NOT.
Reply
Orlandobass
| #
While climate and weather are related, it’s next to impossible to predict how a dynamic and chaotic system like our atmosphere is going to behave. “Meteorologist is the only job where you can be consistently wrong and keep your job.” The weather can’t accurately be predicted one week into the future. How can climate be forecast ten years or more?
Questioning the science is how you do science. Computer models are unreliable because data can be easily manipulated for desired results, not actual results.
Reply