Vaccines known to Cause Allergies / Anaphylaxis since 1913
“Way back in 1913 Charles Richet won the Nobel prize for his research on anaphylaxis when he discovered that any protein injected into the bloodstream of any mammal can cause an allergy to that protein.” (Submission 86, Australian Parliament Inquiry into Allergies and Anaphylaxis 2019)
Did you know that when vaccines are injected into your developing infant multiple animal and food proteins also enter the circulatory system of your child?
Yet despite the medical knowledge above from 1913, parents are left wondering why their child has developed a life-threatening food allergy after vaccination?
The question is ‘why are doctors’ not discussing this fact with parents before they vaccinate?’
By the way, foreign proteins of bacteria, viruses and animals (aka foreign DNA) are also known to cause cancer in humans. And animal proteins (calf, monkey, human foetal cells etc) that are similar to our own human proteins, and all present in the manufacturing process of vaccines, cause autoimmune disease.
Why are doctors not mentioning this to parents before they vaccinate?
Did you know that when you are injecting the 40-50 doses of the 15+ mandatory vaccines into your children (0-14 years of age) that you are also injecting antibiotics into the circulatory system of the body?
Did your doctor tell you that antibiotics are in the traditional childhood vaccines, and they are transported to the digestive system via the circulatory system, where they can upset the natural balance of the microbiome: the flora necessary for proper digestive functioning? I’m guessing that your doctor didn’t tell you that either. Or that antibiotics can cause irritable bowel syndrome etc
Do you know what an excipient is? These are the other components of vaccines that are supposed to be non-active ingredients of vaccines. But guess what? They are not inactive. They are yeast, aluminium, thimerosal (mercury compound), formaldehyde, borax, and multiple other toxins.
Now, I know that your doctor didn’t tell you about these ingredients because doctors are not educated to know the ingredients of vaccines. This is because the pharmaceutical companies sponsor their education and the industry doesn’t believe that doctors or parents need to know this information.
Whilst doctors are educated to believe that ‘vaccines controlled infectious diseases’, they are not educated on the history of how the serious risk of infectious diseases was removed by 1950 in all developed countries: before vaccines were used in mass vaccination campaigns (Fiona Stanley, Australian of the Year, Public Health, 2003).
At this time it was known that environmental, lifestyle and nutritional factors were responsible for the reduction in risk of these diseases. These diseases only flourished in poor environmental and nutritional conditions in 1950. For example, indigenous communities in Australia.
The Inform Me Series on Childhood Vaccines
This is a comprehensive program of webinars provided by independent researchers/scientists to educate parents and health professionals on the true known risks/benefits of government vaccination programs.
The Australian government website only provides industry-funded science assessed by industry-funded experts to present the risks/benefits of vaccines. This results in bias when there is no independent assessment of the research.
Parents are also entitled to discuss the risks of these medications without being falsely labelled as antivaxxers, and to have the choice in how many vaccines they use. Each vaccine must be assessed individually for its risk/benefit profile and this is why it cannot be claimed that all vaccines are ‘safe and effective’.
And we are all genetically different so they are never safe or effective for everyone. Mandatory vaccines are a crime against humanity, and these policies must be revoked to protect the genetic fabric of society and the destruction of human health.
Law Suit Against the American Academy (AAP) of Pediatrics for Racketeering
The AAP is being sued because they have lied to the public about the claims of safety and efficacy of individual childhood vaccines, and the cumulative effects of the combined schedule of 12+ vaccines.
There is no government study that has compared the health effects of vaccinated children with unvaccinated children. But many independent studies have demonstrated the significant increase in chronic illnesses/death in vaccinated children versus unvaccinated children.
Governments are ignoring this evidence and they are not funding the studies that would provide the evidence because they don’t want to make this conclusion. This is the undone science described in my PhD published in January 2016 on the University of Wollongong’s website.
The study of the health of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children requires 10+ years of data because many chronic illnesses take time to develop. Cancers, autoimmune and neurological diseases do not always show symptoms immediately.
It can be months, or years after the exposure before the symptoms appear. This is also linked to your genetics: some individuals will be more likely (predisposed) to get these diseases because of their genetics.
This is the very reason why no medication should ever be mandated in populations and this has been in doctors medical ethical guidelines for decades. It is clear that mandatory vaccination policies are political decisions that have been made by the medical-industry complex and not by independent doctors.
The government and medical-industry are ignoring the independent studies that prove that overwhelming chronic illness and disability are being caused by the government’s schedule of vaccines that is mandatory for childcare and welfare payments.
In Australia this is referred to as the No Jab No Pay/Play policies.
Whilst other environmental factors also play a role in chronic illnesses, vaccines are the biggest environmental factor that all children are exposed to by injection, and chronic illness has increased in direct correlation to the increased use of vaccines.
This is the strongest evidence you can have for a causal relationship when governments choose not to fund studies to provide the empirical evidence. (This is called undone science in government policy and it is described in my PhD, completed 2015).
In 2026 doctors are being taught through their pharmaceutically-funded education to blame these chronic illnesses and autism on ‘genetics’. This is a false claim and it is contrary to the established science of epigenetics.
Epigenetics is the field of science that explains how environmental factors are needed to switch on many genes that are linked to chronic illnesses; these genes would remain dormant without this environmental exposure.
Here are the charges of racketeering in the complaint against the American Academy of Pediatrics. That is, the false claims of safety and efficacy that the AAP has made about vaccines to make enormous profits from these products.
These charges expose a conspiracy (not a ‘theory’) between the AAP and the pharmaceutical companies. The charges even describe how the companies determine the adverse events to the vaccines and then design and sell the treatments for these illnesses/conditions.
They are making enormous profits by making unjustified claims about the benefits of vaccines.
The Vaccination Conversation – Canberra Thursday 28th May 2026
If you would like to hear more about the false claims about the modified mRNA COVID vaccines and the reasons why you should have choice, without coercion, in the use of all childhood vaccines, then join us for our presentation in Canberra 28th May 2026 (6.45 – 9.30pm). Here is the link to the details and tickets for the event.
Please note the focus of the conversation is on choice in vaccination. This is about doctors abiding by their medical ethical guidelines requiring their patients to have “informed consent to vaccination, without coercion manipulation or pressure” (The Australian Immunisation Handbook).
This requires the removal of mandatory government policies that link the vaccination of children to parents ability to work. That is, the right for all parents, under all international human rights conventions, to use childcare centres and to receive essential government welfare benefits in order to provide for their families.
Please visit the Australian Medical Professional Society to support the doctors who are standing up for medical ethics in government policies.
Many of these doctors have been persecuted by the medical regulator, AHPRA, for attempting to protect the patients right to informed consent to all medical interventions.
See more here substack.com
Header image: Eurekalert