University Study: Evidence Exposes 9/11 Cover Up

Families of 9/11 victims file suit against Saudi Arabia ...

On September 11, 2001, at 5:20 p.m., World Trade Center Building 7 suddenly collapsed into its own footprint, falling at free fall speed for 2.5 seconds of its seven-second complete destruction. WTC 7 was not hit by a plane.

After it collapsed, Americans were told that office fires caused a unique — never before seen — complete architectural failure leading to the building collapsing into its own footprint at the rate of gravity.

Despite calls for the evidence to be preserved, New York City officials had the building’s debris removed and destroyed in the ensuing weeks and months, preventing a proper forensic investigation from ever taking place. Seven years later, federal investigators concluded that WTC 7 was the first steel-framed high-rise ever to have collapsed solely as a result of normal office fires.

Naturally, skeptics have been questioning the official story for some time and after moving from the realm of conspiracy theory into the realm of science, an extensive university study has found that the official story of fire causing the collapse is simply not true.

This week, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth announced their partnership with the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) in releasing a draft report of an in depth four-year study on what actually brought down WTC 7. According to the press release, the release of the draft report begins a two-month period during which the public is invited to submit comments. The final report will be published later this year.

According to the study’s authors:

The UAF research team utilized three approaches for examining the structural response of WTC 7 to the conditions that may have occurred on September 11, 2001. First, we simulated the local structural response to fire loading that may have occurred below Floor 13, where most of the fires in WTC 7 are reported to have occurred. Second, we supplemented our own simulation by examining the collapse initiation hypothesis developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Third, we simulated a number of scenarios within the overall structural system in order to determine what types of local failures and their locations may have caused the total collapse to occur as observed.

After conducting comprehensive modeling and studying countless scenarios, the study’s authors, J. Leroy Hulsey, Ph.D., P.E., S.E., UAF, Zhili Quan, Ph.D., Bridge Engineer South Carolina Department of Transportation, and Feng Xiao, Ph.D., Associate Professor Nanjing University of Science and Technology Department of Civil Engineering, concluded the following:

Fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.

The results of this study cannot be dismissed. It completely destroys the narrative that has been shoved down the throats of Americans for nearly two decades. What’s more, this study backs up thousands of other researchers, scientists, and engineers who have been pointing this out for years.

In fact, as TFTP reported in July, history was made in regard to 9/11 as New York area fire commissioners called for a new investigation into the tragic events that unfolded that day. The resolution called for a new investigation due to the “overwhelming evidence” that “pre-planted explosives . . . caused the destruction of the three World Trade Center buildings.”

On July 24, 2019, the Franklin Square and Munson Fire District, which oversees a volunteer fire department serving a hamlet of 30,000 residents just outside of Queens, New York, became the first legislative body in the country to officially support a new investigation into the events of 9/11, according to Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

The resolution calling for a new investigation was drafted by Commissioner Christopher Gioia and it was immediately and unanimously approved by the five commissioners.

“We’re a tight-knit community and we never forget our fallen brothers and sisters. You better believe that when the entire fire service of New York State is on board, we will be an unstoppable force,” said Commissioner Christopher Gioia, adding, “We were the first fire district to pass this resolution. We won’t be the last.”

According to the report:

The impact of 9/11 on the community extends well beyond the victims and their grieving families. On September 12, 2001, the Franklin Square Fire Department was called in to assist with the massive rescue and recovery effort that was just getting underway. Countless members of the department, including Gioia and Commissioner Philip Malloy (then rank-and-file firefighters), spent weeks on the pile searching in vain for civilians and fellow responders who might still be alive. Today, Malloy is one of thousands suffering chronic health effects.

The department also lost one of its own in Thomas J. Hetzel, affectionately referred to as “Tommy” by the commissioners. Hetzel was a full-time member of the New York Fire Department in addition to serving as a volunteer firefighter in Franklin Square. A touching memorial to Hetzel was on display during the meeting, and Hetzel’s widow, parents, and sister were all in attendance.

“The Hetzel and Evans families were very appreciative of the proceedings,” Gioia commented the day after the meeting. “They know it’s an uphill struggle. But at least they have hope, which is something they haven’t had in a long time.”

The importance of this resolution — especially coming from a legislative body of fire fighters — is immense. The impact of first responders calling for a new investigation over the use of explosives is massive. The naysayers who call those who question the official narrative “kooks” will have a hard time going after fire commissioners.

This move and the study above are yet another blow to the highly questionable and hole-filled official narrative. As TFTP reported earlier this year, in another major move from the great folks over at the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, and 9/11 victim family members Robert McIlvaine and Barbara Krukowski-Rastelli, a joint federal lawsuit has been filed to assess any evidence the FBI may have known about that contributed to the destruction of the towers on 9/11 which they may have kept from Congress.

The complaint cites the failure of the FBI and its 9/11 Review Commission to assess key 9/11-related evidence that the FBI can be shown to have had, or been aware of, regarding:

  1. the use of pre-placed explosives to destroy World Trade Center Buildings, 1, 2, and 7;
  2. the arrest and investigation of the “High Fivers” observed photographing and celebrating the attacks on the World Trade Center on 9/11;
  3. terrorist financing related the reported Saudi support for the 9/11 hijackers;
  4. recovered plane parts, including serial numbers from all three crash locations;
  5. video from cameras mounted inside and outside the Pentagon; and
  6. cell phone communications from passengers aboard airplanes.

According to the press release on Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, this is evidence relevant to the 9/11 Review Commission’s and the FBI’s compliance with the mandate from Congress, which should have been assessed by the FBI and the 9/11 Review Commission and reported to Congress. The complaint also cites the destruction by the FBI of evidence related to the “High Fivers.” Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth has joined in bringing the counts that involve the evidence of the World Trade Center’s explosive demolition and evidence related to the “High Fivers,” while the other plaintiffs are party to all counts.

Also, as TFTP previously reported, a monumental step forward in the relentless pursuit of 9/11 truth took place last December when a United States Attorney agreed to comply with federal law requiring submission to a Special Grand Jury of evidence that explosives were used to bring down the World Trade Centers. Then, in March, the group behind the submission, the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, announced the filing of a “petition supplement” naming persons who may have information related to the use of said explosives.

According to Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, the 33-page document contains 15 different categories of persons who may have information material to the investigation, including contractors and security companies that had access to the WTC Towers before 9/11, persons and entities who benefited financially from the WTC demolitions, and persons arrested after being observed celebrating the WTC attacks.

names-redacted version of the petition supplement, which was filed with the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York on February 14, 2019, has been made available to the public. The un-redacted version filed with the U.S. Attorney today will remain undisclosed in the interest of maintaining the secrecy, security, and integrity of the grand jury proceeding.

As TFTP reported in December, for the first time since 9/11 the federal government is taking steps to hear evidence that explosives may have been used to destroy the world trade centers.

The Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry successfully submitted a petition to the federal government demanding that the U.S. Attorney present to a Special Grand Jury extensive evidence of yet-to-be-prosecuted federal crimes relating to the destruction of three World Trade Center Towers on 9/11 (WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7).

After waiting months for the reply, the U.S. Attorney responded in a letter, noting that they will comply with the law.

“We have received and reviewed The Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, Inc.’s submissions of April 10 and July 30, 2018. We will comply with the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3332 as they relate to your submissions,” U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman stated.

According to the petition, dozens of exhibits were presented as evidence that explosives were used to destroy all three world trade centers.

The Lawyers’ Committee’s April 10th 52-page original Petition was accompanied by 57 exhibits and presented extensive evidence that explosives were used to destroy three WTC Towers on 9/11.That evidence included independent scientific laboratory analysis of WTC dust samples showing the presence of high-tech explosives and/or incendiaries; numerous first-hand reports by First Responders of seeing and hearing explosions at the World Trade Center on 9/11; expert analysis of seismic evidence that explosions occurred at the WTC towers on 9/11 both prior to the airplane impacts and prior to the building collapses; and expert analysis and testimony by architects, engineers, and scientists concluding that the rapid onset symmetrical near-free-fall acceleration collapse of these three WTC high rise buildings on 9/11 exhibited the key characteristics of controlled demolition. The July 30th Amended Petition included the same evidence but also addressed several additional federal crimes beyond the federal bombing crime addressed in the original Petition.

The Lawyers’ Committee concluded in the petitions that explosive and incendiary devices that had been preplaced at the WTC were detonated causing the complete collapse of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and Building 7 on 9/11, and the resulting tragic loss of life, and that “the evidence permits no other conclusion — as a matter of science, as a matter of logic, and as a matter of law.”

“This Petition Supplement is intended to assist the Special Grand Jury by providing a roadmap for a meaningful investigation into the yet-to-be-prosecuted 9/11 WTC crimesthat the Lawyers’ Committee has reported and documented in our Petitions,” Attorney David Meiswinkle, President of the Lawyers’ Committee’s Board of Directors, said.

Finally, after nearly two decades of ridicule, dismissal, and outright intolerance of information contrary to the “official story” of what happened on 9/11, the public may finally learn the truth of what happened and who was behind it.

Read more at The Free Thought Project

****

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.

Trackback from your site.

Comments (8)

  • Avatar

    Steve

    |

    “Normal office fire”? How many tons of burning aircraft grade aluminum fueled by escaping liquid oxygen and jet fuel were present?

    Reply

  • Avatar

    rod

    |

    In thinking about it, a building’s deign involves everything above any particular level being able to be supported by what is below. Discounting the shock of impact and explosion from above a particular level, and the ongoing heat, at some point down along the height of the buildings, shouldn’t the structures have been able to support all that was above?

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Joseph Olson

    |

    “Unequivocal 9/11 Nukes” at principia-australia(.)org > structural engineer that studies WTC since 2001. I attended Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth DVD premier in Austin, in May 2009 with Alex Jones and InfoWars. Controlled Demolition YES, thermite was impossible.

    “Breathtaking: Solving Nuclear 9/11” at VeteransToday(.)com > based on eighty articles by VT Investigators and Heinz Pommer at 911history(.)de

    I will have my fifth interview on this with Dr James Fetzer, Sunday, Sept 8, 2019.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    burns matkin

    |

    The problem with all conspiracies is that in order for this type to work, a very large number of people would have had to be involved or a very long time period with no leaks to media. The collapses were very weird indeed but that doesn’t mean it was a govt. cover up or conspiracy.
    Building 7 is problematic.
    The OKC bombing is far more worrisome in my mind. Why? Two reasons 1. The over pressure of the blast from outside the building caused hardened and reinforced concrete columns to shear off. That is simply impossible. 2. No ATF or FBI personnel were in the building at the time. Given their usual start time, this is very, very suspicious.
    I am beginning to think the FBI has been controlled by globalists since its foundation.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Nick Schroeder

    |

    A popular misconception about the twin towers is that a typical steel I-beam column and girder structure could not collapse they way the towers did.
    Therein lies the clue. The towers were not typical I-beam construction.
    Look up at the ceiling structure of a typical big box store. Notice the steel rod lattice design of the trusses that support the roof. Contemplate how quickly a hot fire would destroy those.
    That’s how the floors of the twin towers were designed.
    These floors were simple, quick and cheap to fabricate on the ground and fly up to the desired floor. The floor sections were clipped to the central concrete elevator column at one end and to the outer walls at the other.
    Picture a piece of wagon wheel pasta.
    The floors were about an acre in area, 200 ft on each side. The wing span of the airplane literally cut the building in two.
    When the upper floors collapsed on the lower floors the lattice design could not sustain that additional weight not to mention the intense fires melting those small rod fames.
    Simplest explanation for the observation.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      czechlist

      |

      Occam’s razor?
      I am amazed that so many people believe in conspiracies (FDR/Pearl Harbor, Roswell, JFK assassination, Apollo, Waco, 9/11, Iraq war…) and blame the gov’t, but refuse to consider the FBI, CIA and /or Obama Admin could have tried to frame Trump.
      Don’t know – just sayin’
      czechout

      Reply

  • Avatar

    Mark

    |

    One more time. As a retired Senior Special Agent who had friends and colleagues at Ground Zero, the idea that they would have allowed these unnamed conspirators to plant explosives as part of some conspiracy is dishonoring their service. You CANNOT gain access and plant explosives in some quick and willy nilly fashion. It has to be done over time, which would require the Federal Agents in and around the buildings involved (yes, they had office space) to be either deaf, dumb and blind or part of the conspiracy. Please show evidence by name which Agents were involved, I dare you. Otherwise, stick to areas where you have some definite information, like with Climate Change.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Hoop

    |

    “presence of high-tech explosives and/or incendiaries;”

    is simply not enough evidence.

    And the Towers very possibly HAD explosives onsite, ‘in storage,’ for various official capacities – storage for authorities etc… The Port Authority had offices there – and the Feds had offices there too. and it is possible that they have a vault/storage of some explosives for various reasons on site. NYC does indeed have explosives stored in the city…

    The AMOUNT of explosives needed to completely raze the 3 buildings would have been stunning and would have taken months to install. Finding residues would NOT have been difficult and there would have been considerable residues everywhere.

    Having ‘some’ evidence – is simply no enough.

    Further – video of WT7 clearly shows the HVAC cooling root-top unit falling in first before anything else fails…. – only then do the sides come down and that is ONLY AFTER a stair step crack running about the height of the building appears…. not a characteristic of a razed building.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via