UK scientists: PCR testing useless, pure money-making scam

In Great Britain there is now resistance to mass testing in the population using RT-PCR tests. These are too expensive. But not only that: they are also more or less completely useless.

The mass testing of people using RT-PCR tests has been under severe criticism for some time.

Among other things, because it creates a “test pandemic”.

Because these tests are not able to determine whether someone is actually infected with SARS-CoV-2 or not. Only RNA fragments are searched which can also originate from inactive virus fragments.

Self-test fanatics like the British microbiologist Professor Alan McNally, who helped a British testing laboratories in the development, urges a shift away from these tests.

The UK’s PCR mass testing program has become a “mock-up” for private laboratories and has outlived its usefulness, he said. With an average of 400,000 tests per day, that’s an impressive sum that comes together over the course of a month.

Why do we offer a PCR test for Covid to anyone who has a cold? We have never done this with any other infectious disease,” he said. “It was absolutely necessary last March because this was the only way we could anticipate the broadcast. Today the playing field has changed completely”.

The PCR test cannot be used

But otherwise the RT-PCR test is absolutely absurd. For example, it was only this year that German researchers dismantled the PCR test . For example, you have found that the majority of those who test positive are not contagious.

The problem with this: the Ct values that are too high are still being used. However, the higher this value, the less likely an actual infection or transmission is. That is why no pointless mass tests are carried out in Sweden .

In Germany and Austria, on the other hand, the authorities do not care.

Science is only accepted if it produces the desired results. 

The narratives have to be kept up, otherwise all the measures would have made no sense, right?

What did Drosten say at MERS back then?

Even if the so-called fact checkers tend to twist statements, it is worth taking a look at the pillar saint of the Covid sect, Christian Drosten.

At the time, he said to the science magazine Science regarding the PCR tests: “But now people are being tested not because they are sick, but because they have had contact with a patient. Some of them have tested positive, but many of them don’t really get sick.

The reason for this? According to Drosten, there were no false positives, it was due to something else:

We also re-examined samples from six healthcare workers who were caring for a patient in Tabuk; they appeared to be positive at a very low level. I can say without a doubt that these results are real. If you look at the PCR data for all recent tests, the signals are often very weak.

And what is not considered today with SARS-CoV-2: “Asymptomatic people should not be tested with PCR.

See the original German-language article here: report24.news

Bold emphasis added

Editor’s note: PSI’s position is that our scientists believe COVID19 is merely influenza rebranded because the CDC, FDA and several national governments still do not show a gold standard isolate of the novel coronavirus and thus it is not proven to exist in empirical science.

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (9)

  • Avatar

    very old white guy

    |

    A test that has proven to be mostly false. That and computer models are what the whu who flu is all about.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Bevan

    |

    My understanding is that the patent rights to the test are owned by an offshoot of the pharmaceutical industry so of course it was going to be mandatory once the man-made virus was circulated.
    The corruption in today’s world is mind-blowing and will be our ruin if we are not prepared to stand up for truth and justice.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    itsme

    |

    trouble is, wasn’t Gates introducing a ‘new’ test on 1st January?
    one that could tell between ‘covid’ (ha) and flu.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    T Brew

    |

    I believe Itsme is close to the real point. They also claim that this new test can differentiate between flu and corona. This is their off hand admission that it tests positive with nearly any virus. Can it tell c19 from another corona now too? Or is this more inflation tactics. Fda recalled it some time ago, but hadva notice that it would stay on market until this replacement test was out.
    I am willing to bet it is a dual test, and they can skew it either direction they want. Flu for those jabbed (to push another kind of pandemic and jab) and c19 for those without jabs, to inflate cases and push the shots even harder… It would not surprise me one bit.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Tom

    |

    Without the fake PCR testing, there is no pandemic and no need for any mRNA gene therapy injections. The entire agenda is designed to promote fear of a virus that does not exist in the human population nearly as much as we are told. The entire world’s medical mafia is corrupt.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Ahmed Soorma

    |

    How then to explain nearly or more accurately 17 million deaths worldwide as reported by the “ECONOMIST” magazine?
    Has an accurate analysis been carried out to determine those who have died are due to COVID 19 or from other underlying symptoms accelerated by weakened defences due to Covid 19 attack? Who has the gumption to question the accuracy of this data? And how can it be proved beyond doubt? These are serious questions to be addressed.

    Reply

  • url shortening

    |

    url shortening

    UK scientists: PCR testing useless, pure money-making scam | Principia Scientific Intl.

    Reply

  • seo lists

    |

    seo lists

    UK scientists: PCR testing useless, pure money-making scam | Principia Scientific Intl.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via