Top UK Govt Scientist: ‘Lockdown A Monumental Mistake’

LOCKDOWN will come to be seen as a “monumental mistake on a global scale” and must never happen again, a scientist who advises the Government on infectious diseases says.

Mark Woolhouse said lockdown was a “panic measure” but admitted it was the only option at the time because “we couldn’t think of anything better to do”.

But it is a crude measure that takes no accounts of the risk levels to different individuals, the University of Edinburgh professor said, meaning that back in March the nation was “concentrating on schools when we should have been concentrating on care homes”.

The professor of infectious disease epidemiology said that the Government must now focus on increasing testing and striving to unlock society safely rather than restricting it further.

Prof Woolhouse OBE, a member of the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviours that advises the Government, said: “Lockdown was a panic measure and I believe history will say trying to control Covid-19 through lockdown was a monumental mistake on a global scale, the cure was worse than the disease.

“I never want to see national lockdown again. It was always a temporary measure that simply delayed the stage of the epidemic we see now. It was never going to change anything fundamentally, however low we drove down the number of cases, and now we know more about the virus and how to track it we should not be in this position again.

“We absolutely should never return to a position where children cannot play or go to school.

“I believe the harm lockdown is doing to our education, health care access, and broader aspects of our economy and society will turn out to be at least as great as the harm done by Covid-19.”

He said that Sage, the government’s advisory board on dealing with Covid, needed to have members from a wider range of fields.

This would allow it a better understanding of how lockdown has had effects across the whole of society.

He said:

“I suspect right now more people are being harmed by the collateral effects of lockdown than by Covid-19.

“This is why we need a broader range of people on the government advisory board Sage with equal input from economists to assess the damage to incomes, jobs and livelihoods, educationalists to assess the damage to children and mental health specialists to assess levels of depression and anxiety especially among younger adults, as well as psychologists to assess the effects of not being able to go to the theatre or a football match.”

Prof Woolhouse said he had hoped the combined efforts of the world’s scientists would work out how to handle the virus during lockdown. But this hadn’t happened.

He said:

“At the time I agreed with lockdown as a short term emergency response because we couldn’t think of anything better to do, but it was always clear that the moment we started to relax enough measures we were likely to see infection rates rise again either nationally or locally.

“My hope was that we would have learnt how to handle the virus better so lockdown would no longer be necessary.”

Read more at www.express.co.uk


PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.

Trackback from your site.

Comments (13)

  • Avatar

    peter daley

    |

    Good to see common sense still prevails in the ocean of prevailing ignorance.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Tom O

    |

    Sounds great until you read it. We never did find the virus so we surely never learned how to deal with it. It wasn’t a “panic” move, it was an idiot move. The death total for it is the sum total of people that died from “something” while having some of the 101 symptoms that this “virus” supposedly caused. Sorry, but “panic” is not something I expect from credentialed officials and high ranking government officials. Every single “leader” in the health arena should resign, and accept no pension for the crappy job they have done. If that is leadership, we are better off with the class clown.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Alan

      |

      That lets Boris off the hook. The government is to blame for this fiasco.

      Reply

  • Avatar

    Alder

    |

    ” Government must now focus on increasing testing ”
    But, is there a reliable test?
    This site (Aug 21) among others has opinion that the widely used pcr test is useless.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      judy Ryan

      |

      I agree, the test is useless. It is massively oversensitive as it tests positive to people who have antibodies to the common cold. Whether this is by design as in the global cooling/global warming/climate change scam or if so many people have been dumbed down by subversive educational curriculum that the herd mentality will fall for the scam. I guess it is a bit of both

      Reply

  • Avatar

    Andy Rowlands

    |

    ‘A monumental mistake on a global scale’ – looks like the ‘conspracy theorists’ were right again.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    dairylea

    |

    Aрpreciation to my father who statеd to me about this website, this blog is actualⅼy awesome.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via