Time Dilation Measured In Laboratory

Scientists were able to measure time dilation at a distance of just a millimeter, about the width of a pencil tip.

Albert Einstein’s theory of general relativity is packed with weird insights about our reality, but perhaps the most mind-boggling is the fact that strong gravitational fields or incredibly high speeds can warp the passage of time, an effect known as time dilation. For instance, clocks located onboard spacecraft might tick slightly faster or slower than those on Earth, depending on the distortive effects of their velocities and our planet’s gravity on time.

Now, in a major breakthrough, scientists at JILA, a joint operation between the National Institute of Standards and Technology and the University of Colorado Boulder, have measured time dilation at the smallest scale ever using the most accurate clocks in the world. The team showed that clocks located just a millimeter apart—about the width of a pencil tip—showed slightly different times due to the influence of Earth’s gravity.

The new experiment paves the way toward clocks with 50 times the precision of those available today, which could be used for a host of practical applications, while also shedding light on fundamental mysteries about our universe, including the long-sought “union of general relativity and quantum mechanics,” according to a study published on Wednesday in Nature.

“When you go to such a small scale, what does that mean? It means that the clock precision is better,” said Jun Ye, a JILA physicist who co-authored the study, in a call. “In some sense, what we are trying to say is that time and space are interconnected. As Einstein’s relativity told us, time is space, space is time, and time is relative. There’s no absolute concept of time.”

Ye and his colleagues at JILA have been pushing the frontiers of timekeeping and general relativity for several years by designing ever-more accurate atomic clocks. The role of the pendulum in these clocks is played by the shifting frequency of electrons in atoms that are carefully arrayed in lattices designed to control their chaotic energy and motion.

These innovations distinguish atomic clocks as being by far the most accurate timekeepers ever devised, capable of losing just one second over 15 billion years, which is why they are used on Global Positioning Service (GPS) satellites and other systems that require hyper-precise time.

In 2010, JILA scientists used these clocks to measure time dilation at two points with a difference in elevation of 33 centimeters (roughly a foot), which was a big advance at that point. After a decade of fine-tuning their clocks, Ye and his colleagues have managed to track frequency shifts within a sample of 100,000 extremely cold strontium atoms, enabling them to snag the unprecedented millimeter-scale effects of dilation. 

What’s more, the team managed to keep these atoms dancing in perfect unison for 37 seconds, setting a new record for the duration of “quantum coherence,” or the state in which the behavior of these atoms can be predicted.

“The first day, when we were able to start to see this long coherence time, we couldn’t believe it,” Ye recalled. “Quantum coherence sounds very microscopic. The atom is revealing to you how electrons are moving around the nucleus, and so on. But it’s incredible to think of 37 seconds, almost a minute—that’s a very macroscopic timescale, a ‘human being’ timescale.”

“When I was talking to my students, I said: ‘This is the first time in my life that I can imagine my atom ticking back and forth in a coherent fashion while I drink a cup of coffee,” he continued. “In the end, actually, this is the essence of this quantum revolution we are talking about now. It’s fascinating to bring quantum phenomena, which is something very microscopic, into the worldview of the macroscopic.”

Bringing this bizarre quantum world into our more familiar surroundings can help scientists pursue some of the biggest open questions in science. For instance, researchers have tried for decades to make general relativity, which governs the large-scale cosmos of stars and galaxies, agree with quantum mechanics, which sets the rules in the tiny realm inside atoms. As atomic clocks become ever more accurate, scientists will be able to actually see the waves of atoms across the curvature of spacetime, where the classical and quantum worlds clash.

“That is fundamental as it gets, if we get to that point,” Ye said. “That’s an area of physics that we have never explored.” If these clocks can be improved by another factor of 20, Ye added, “we get into a very, very interesting regime” that will yield “new insights when quantum mechanics finally meets up with general relativity.”

Beyond these new discoveries about the basic nature of our reality, the increasingly accurate clocks are inspiring a virtually endless list of potential applications that range from predictions of volcanic eruptions, to measurements of sea level rise, to deep space missions.

“The entire Earth is a living body; it’s moving around very actively,” Ye said. “When you are talking about global warming and the changing Earth, we need better tools to be able to monitor what’s going on. You can use clocks to actually measure the change in Earth because time and space are intrinsically connected.”

“We often like to make a joke: ‘We live a healthy life of a hundred years and during that period, your head ages a little faster than your feet by about half a microsecond,” he noted. “It’s minute on a biological scale—who cares about half a microsecond over a hundred years of my lifetime? But it makes all the difference in terms of measuring how the Earth is changing, and measuring how eventually, we can drive manned or unmanned vehicles to land on Mars or other distant planets. It’s all based on this precise timing of information.”

See more here: vice.com

Header image: The Great Courses Daily

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (5)

  • Avatar

    Howdy

    |

    “capable of losing just one second over 15 billion years”
    Unfortunately, that claim is all theory since nobody can test it. Makes the rest of the claims suspect.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    T. C. Clark

    |

    The clock must be fragile. It would be interesting o measure time dilation from speed. Of course everything on the surface of earth is in motion…about 1000 mph for an object on the equator…plus add the motion of earth around sun…plus the solar system around the milky Way …plus the Milky Way through space….the net speed would be variable due to the complex paths…..but a relative speed between 2 clocks on earth is all that is needed and the complex speed of both clocks through the Universe cancels out…..almost.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Robert Beatty

    |

    The Sun is our most powerful source of gravity in the inner parts of the solar system, and effects time in a ‘viscous’ way. Other points of mass attract their own proportionate gravity fields. As we move away from the solar system, gravity coming from the centre of our Gravisphere at V616 dominates. The Pioneer anomaly helped to demonstrate this.
    See http://www.bosmin.com/PSL/PioneerAnomaly.pdf

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Ken Hughes

    |

    “………………………..and time is relative. There’s no absolute concept of time.”

    Who says? Time has upper and lower limits, from zero time rate at the event horizon of a black hole, to the maximum time rate, (equivalent to the speed of light), in the far reaches of intergalactic space.

    Any process that has limits, (and they all do), cannot be purely relative, it has to be finite and real. After all, a zero time rate is zero from ALL perspectives and so is the theoretical maximum time rate. That does not mean that time (rate) is not relative, it is, it’s just that it is not PURELY relative. Time rate is a real process, the rate at which processes and systems evolve.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Tom

    |

    This difference is in the measurement of time passing. Time may be fluid, always chugging away no matter how you might measure it.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via