The Science Against Human Caused Carbon Dioxide Warming
History, science, and facts (not alarmist computer models) when properly examined, prove that Human-caused CO2 Global Warming is a fraud. In his new book William Masters shows how the ‘greenhouse gas effect’ – the cornerstone of man-made global warming – is fraudulently cobbled together.
The author takes you from the discovery of Infrared Radiation in 1800 to what passes as our present-day’s understanding of climate and the newest phase: Cosmo-Climatology unfolding at the CERN Laboratory, Geneva, Switzerland.
This new volume explains the errors made in the so-called Greenhouse Effect when natural philosophers first began formulating a climate theory over a century ago. Errors that remain embedded from then until now include a crass inability to measure the Sun’s radiation despite the overlooked sister field of space science showing we are well equipped today with our modern technology to do a much better job.
Where Victorian amateur scientists (and modern academics!) guessed, impartial and astute researchers may accurately measure such parameters and so the discrepancies between fact and fiction woven into official climate theory can be exposed.
For example, uncritical minds will never wonder where the 59F/15C degrees of heat the ‘Greenhouse Effect’ is supposed to provide the Earth came from.
It was calculated in 1827 by Joseph Fourier, and it was way off, but in this volume Fourier’s fudge is revealed and likewise is the consensus omission to identify and correct this archaic error.
In turn, believers in the ‘Greenhouse Effect’ will tell you that visible light somehow morphs into infrared (IR) radiation. A discerning eye and adherence to known empirical science tells us visible light is not heat. Fourier was wrong about that, too. Modern calibrations from NASA show a starkly different reality than the fiction presented by consensus science; measurements of solar energy entering and being emitted by Earth are public record. They tell us that the energy coming in and going out of earth’s system are identical in both wavelength and amplitude.
Greenhouse Gas Warming supporters now reluctantly admit that any added atmospheric CO2 will absorb, and block out some additional solar radiation, which is thereby prevented from adding heat. In and of itself, this fact discredits the theory! Yet greenhouse gas cultists stubbornly and incorrectly hold that the atmospheric blocking of inward solar energy is insignificant because the IR portion of the Sun’s emissions is too small.
We know that IR makes up 52 percent of the Sun’s radiant emissions, and includes the UV percentage. While the remaining 38 percent is made up of all the other wave bands: Gamma Rays, X-Rays, Visible waves, Microwaves, and Radio waves.
“But what about Venus’ heat, 860F degrees is not cold” the cultists say.
True, but if it weren’t for its 95 percent Carbon-dioxide atmosphere, the temperature at the surface of Venus would be over 4,000F degrees.
Carbon-dioxide and all the “greenhouse gases” (Water Vapor, Carbon Dioxide, Methane, Ozone, Nitrous Oxide, and Chlorofluorocarbons), cool the earth by over 180F degrees by absorbing and blocking out the Sun’s incoming heat just as they do on Venus.
In this book, the physics the cultists don’t want you to know is explained and the mathematical formulas are provided for you to do the mathematical calculations, if you so choose.
Despite the crazy new age of faith to a new God “Man-Made Global Warming”, there is real science coming forward to help the masses rekindle a love for the Tree of Knowledge and help dispel the Darkness of Superstition. You will find a welcome helping hand toward the light here in THE SCIENCE AGAINST HUMAN CAUSED CARBON DIOXIDE WARMING.
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Trackback from your site.
Dan Paulson
| #
Please please please,
Would someone at least proofread these articles before publication? It is hard enough to be taken seriously in this scientific realm without printing articles apparently written by 10 year old English lads…..
Reply
SadiJevons
| #
…printing articles apparently written by 10 year old English lads – and other lads saying nonsense like:
“No energy system can produce sum useful energy in excess of the total energy put into constructing it.”
Reply
Wally
| #
IOW, you cannot refute what’s in the article.
Reply
Doug Harrison
| #
There is a problem in the writing of papers in the English language in PSI but it’s a problem that sits across the whole of the English speaking world. It stems from two sources:
(1) The do gooders in the USA who thought it would be “easier” if the language was “simplified” and so changed the meaning and use of prepositions and the spelling of many words.
(2) The influence of socialist unions in the world wide teaching profession who also thought that the best use of vocabulary was “elitist” and so should be dumbed down.
This article is by no means the worst I have read here but it’s up there for certain.
However the nub of what is said or implied here cannot be disputed even if it could be better presented.
Reply
James McGinn
| #
Obviously two of the responses above are made by the same person. Obviously this person makes his living as a climate change propagandist and has no training as a scientist, making him incapable of countering William’s expose on in incompetence of the whole discipline of climatology. He is, I’m guessing, an english major who has learned to fake his way through the science, which is actually very easy in the field of climatology since it is a completely phoney scientific discipline. William Masters, in contrast, is a genuine scientist. And William is somebody, not unlike myself, who is generally pissed off that so much of science has been taken over by english majors and others whose talents involve marketing and otherwise don’t have an empirical bone in their bodies.
It is interesting that the scientifically incompetent person who complained about about the use of language in this article did not provide specific quotes about the use of language. I read the article twice. It is very competent, intelligent. William Masters obviously is no slouch when it comes to using the english language. I did, however find some phrases that would be bothersome to a phoney climate scientist. Here are some quotes:
CO2 Global Warming is a fraud.
man-made global warming – is fraudulently cobbled together.
errors made in the so-called Greenhouse Effect
Errors that remain embedded from then until now
a crass inability to measure the Sun’s radiation
It was calculated in 1827 by Joseph Fourier, and it was way off,
the consensus omission to identify and correct this archaic error.
Modern calibrations from NASA show a starkly different reality than the fiction presented by consensus science;
greenhouse gas cultists stubbornly and incorrectly hold
Carbon-dioxide and all the “greenhouse gases” (Water Vapor, Carbon Dioxide, Methane, Ozone, Nitrous Oxide, and Chlorofluorocarbons), cool the earth by over 180F degrees by absorbing and blocking out the Sun’s incoming heat just as they do on Venus.
the physics the cultists don’t want you to know dispel the Darkness of Superstition.
In the private sector there is the phenomena whereby companies get taken over by their marketing departments, the engineers all quit or get fired, and then the company fails. (As an example, think of Apple computer before it was retaken over by Steve Jobs.) The same thing happens in scientific disciplines. The english majors take over, the scientists all quit or get labelled “science deniers” and get fired but the discipline doesn’t fail. It just keeps doubling down on worthless, sciencey sounding propaganda.
There is nothing wrong with William Masters use of prose in this article. There is also nothing wrong with William Masters grasp of the science. And this is really what the scientifically illiterate fraud above is having a problem with.
James McGinn / Genius
The Roof Leaks at the Top: Conversation with Edwin Berry Phd.
https://www.thunderbolts.info/forum3/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=446
Reply
george johnson
| #
Plus the glaring fact remain that every massive major threat to the human species from climate has been from ice ages rather than warming. Cold weather kills more food trees/crops and starvation kills the most humans. Another case of “Don’t believe your eyes; believe Al Gore”
Reply
Monty
| #
Since Man-made global warming transformed to man-made global climate change, couldn’t the climate alarmists claim the the “greenhouse gasses” are causing man-made global cooling?
Reply
Just Me
| #
I will probably buy the book.
I’m confused about the following statement: “True, but if it weren’t for its 95 percent Carbon-dioxide atmosphere, the temperature at the surface of Venus would be over 4,000F degrees.”
Reply