The Fraud That Launched the mRNA ‘Vaccine’ Era

Written by A Midwestern Doctor on October 19, 2026. Posted in Current News

A forensic audit of Pfizer‘s trial data, newly released Argentine regulatory documents, and what they reveal about the “safe and effective” claim the entire mRNA platform rests upon

In a recent article, I highlighted the “law of displacement” which encapsulates my belief that a harmful lucrative technology, regardless of the evidence against it, will almost only be removed from the market once either a more profitable alternative emerges, or a less harmful but equally profitable one does (as in all other cases, the profit the technology makes outweighs the cost of silencing critics of its toxicity).

In some cases, this works in a positive manner and finally expels bad things from the market (e.g., lead in gasoline), but in other cases, it results in something worse entering the market.

Presently, there are increasing signs of a major push to replace the existing vaccine schedule with mRNA vaccines, and on one side, this has been accompanied by increasing mainstream discussion of the serious issues with vaccination (along with efforts by authors like me to highlight how many of these problems are due to the foundational issues with how most vaccines are produced)—which, on one level is an extremely positive shift.

Note: this is somewhat similar to how the statin community went to great lengths to dismiss the existence of their (extremely common) side effects, but then suddenly pivoted to stating a large number of patients are “statin intolerant” once a need arose to sell far more expensive next-generation cholesterol lowering drugs (detailed here).

However, while I have serious concerns about traditional vaccines, the more I study the mRNA technology, the more I feel it is significantly more problematic than the existing platforms (e.g., in a recent article I highlighted how these vaccines have an intrinsic problem with the toxicity of the lipid nanoparticles used to deliver them, shedding to those who were not vaccinated, persisting within the body, suppressing the immune system, getting into the nucleus where DNA is, and causing cancer—all of which becomes even worse when it mass produces a highly toxic antigen like the spike protein).

Furthermore, while each of those is a major issue, I believe the largest problem with the mRNA technology is simply the fact so much of it remains unknown, but rather than slow down to try and understand the actual physiologic consequences of the widespread genetic pollution this technology is creating (something humanity has never had to deal with before), because so much money stands to be made off something which can “print out new medical technologies like a computer code,” a decision has been made by mRNA’s investors to go full speed ahead and find a way to sweep any issues that later emerge under the rug (a situation somewhat analogous to the current situation with AI—where many of the top researchers have admitted in private they don’t actually understand how it is working).

Note: in places like Europe, the precautionary principle—“where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation”—is widely practiced, while in the United States, it receives much less of an emphasis as economic progress (which the precautionary principle slows) is prioritized.

For that reason, I feel it is important to briefly review the timeline of the mRNA vaccines:

1. For decades, mRNA could not find a dose that was both safe and effective.¹ Most recently, Moderna had raised billions by selling investors the vision of life as software that could be rewritten into health, yet it could not make even its easiest target (a single missing liver enzyme) work, which left vaccines as the only viable use, since one or two doses never gave the toxicity time to accumulate.^1,2 By the time COVID arrived, both existing mRNA companies were in trouble. Moderna’s December 2018 IPO, then the largest in biotech history, fell 19% on its first day,^1,2 and the company closed 2019 with no product, a $1.5 billion accumulated deficit, and a share price below its offering.^1,2 BioNTech had never taken a product past phase 2 and had to shrink its October 2019 IPO to find enough buyers,^1,2 a month after the Gates Foundation bought in at a higher price.^1,2 Both needed what a former Moderna employee had called a “miraculous, Hail Mary sort of save.”¹

2. A 2004 law created the FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) authority, allowing unapproved drugs, vaccines, and devices (or unapproved uses of approved ones) to be deployed once an emergency is declared¹ (first used in 2005 to authorize the anthrax vaccine).¹ In 2016 at Davos, the Gates Foundation and the World Bank proposed running large-scale pandemic simulations modeled on the Department of Defense’s war games,¹ which then happened in October 2019 as Event 201, a simulated coronavirus pandemic (which I now think happened after COVID already had begun to spread).¹ When COVID officially arrived months later, each organization stepped into the role it had rehearsed: CEPI (Gates’s industry coalition) directed vaccine funding, the Gates Foundation handled financing and distribution, the World Bank mobilized resources, and the WHO coordinated messaging.¹ Much of this built upon work in July 2017 where CEPI presented the WHO with its plan for the next pandemic: rapidly financing liability-free “emergency” vaccines and bringing them to market under a “no loss” guarantee that reimbursed developers for their direct and indirect costs.¹

3. The moment COVID emerged, significant focus was given to developing mRNA vaccines (e.g., the NIH gave Moderna their own research they’d invested years into), as beyond the existing incentives, mRNA technology was seen as the ideal “solution” for a pandemic because the vaccines could be produced in a very short time. In tandem, Operation Warp Speed enacted the Gates-led plan for rapid emergency vaccine development, effective treatments (which would eliminate the need for EUA vaccines) were stonewalled and the population was isolated, preventing America from developing herd immunity to COVID before the vaccines came out.

Note: a key part of the push for bringing the COVID vaccines to market came from the fact Trump had been boxed into needing them to reopen the country so he could win the 2020 election (so everything possible was done to accelerate their development and approval—which included cutting many corners), which ultimately resulted in them backstabbing him at the last moment by delaying the vaccine until after the election.^1,2

4. Accelerated clinical trials were conducted, which concluded the vaccines were very safe and “95 percent effective.” On the basis of these trials, an EUA was granted, which came with the condition the vaccines would be rigorously evaluated for safety once they hit the market^1,2 (e.g. V-safe was specifically made as a more robust way to monitor vaccine safety since there were limitations to what VAERS data could show). In tandem with this, what was arguably the most aggressive propaganda campaign in history was enacted to vaccinate as many people as possible.

5. The moment the vaccines hit the market, due to their toxicity, a wide range of side effects emerged—all of which were dismissed because they were “anecdotal” and not shown in the robust clinical trials. Following this, nearly every database started showing massive red flags existed with the vaccines, but in each case, the data was either hidden, doctored or ignored. For example, through extensive litigation, ICAN received the V-safe data, which showed serious safety issues existed within it (that the curated publication in a top medical journal had deliberately hidden), and free text data (which took further litigation to obtain) that showed large numbers of COVID vaccine recipients who deeply trusted the system had severe, progressive (and often fatal) injuries—many of whom gradually realized they had been exploited and abandoned once no one from the CDC ever got back to them.

This is taken from a long document, read the rest here midwesterndoctor.com

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About Covid 19