Summer Heatwaves Are NOT Unprecedented: Slaying the Scaremongers

July 30, 2022 – Hi and welcome to another episode of Sky Dragon Slaying where we bring you the truth on science and current affairs the mainstream would rather you didn’t know. Swedish physicist, Anders Nordenfelt joins us to dismantle the climate crazy claims over ‘dangerous climate change.’

I’m John O’Sullivan, CEO of Principia Scientific International (PSI).  Joining me as usual are Canadian space scientist, Joe Postma and Texas engineer extraordinaire, Joe Olson.

To help us today explain the science better for our listeners with have with us a climate realist guest, physicist Anders Nordenfelt. He is a professor from King Juan Carlos University, Spain. He is Swedish by birth and obtained his PhD from the University of Gothenburg.

Anders has followed our work at PSI for a decade and shares our concern that governments deliberately foist fake science on the population for nefarious ends. We ran his excellent blog post last week: ‘Lukewarmists: Reclaiming The Neanderthal Effect?’

LISTEN TO THE FULL RECORDING BELOW:

Currently, we are in the middle of summer in the northern hemisphere and, as usual, climate alarmist are blaming every heat wave on man-made global warming.

In Britain two days of alleged record-breaking temperatures at the end of July, where a few thermometer located near airports, crept above 100 degrees Fahrenheit (40 degrees Celsius) the crazy greens were triggered to protest governments enforce an urgent cut on ‘greenhouse gas emissions.’

As we know, the BBC and other fake news propagandists relentlessly spew out the lie that some place somewhere far from here, is ‘warming faster than the rest of the word.‘ As an example of this cynical media brainwashing of the masses, see image below:

 

We are told that ‘unprecedented’ human emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) are driving global warming, according to the supposed science of the greenhouse gas theory which claims that carbon dioxide is our planet’s climate ‘control knob.’

But as the thousands of scientists and researchers associated with Principia Scientific International (PSI) know all too well, this CO2-obsessed climate theory is pure junk science.

For over 12 years PSI has demonstrated successfully that the so-called greenhouse gas theory, the cornerstone of climate alarm, is built upon junk science.

During our two-hour discussion with Anders we covered the failures of both the climate alarmists and lukewarmers, who defend the nonsense of the supposed heat trapping/delayed cooling of CO2 claimed to exist in the greenhouse effect.

As we ‘Slayers’ of the mythical CO2 sky dragon explain, there is not a single application in applied science and industry of carbon dioxide as an insulator (trapping heat/delaying cooling). In fact, the reality is diametrically opposed to the claims of the CO2 haters – this trace gas has been used for over a century as a COOLANT (air conditioners, refrigerators, dry ice, etc).

For a complete list of shows and our schedule offered on TNT Radio, simply visit our website at tntradio.live. We serve up the latest live news and current affairs presented by a host of credible and expert commentators who can separate fact from fiction, truth from propaganda! Right here on TNT Radio.

About John O’Sullivan John is CEO and co-founder (with Dr Tim Ball) of Principia Scientific International (PSI).  John is a seasoned science writer and legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann in the ‘science trial of the century‘. O’Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘Slayers’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world’s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book.


Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.

Trackback from your site.

Comments (5)

  • Avatar

    Russ D

    |

    We can blame everything on “Climate Change”

    Hotter than average summer? “Climate Change”
    Colder than average Winter? “Climate Change”
    Above average rainfall? “Climate Change”
    Below average rainfall? “Climate Change”
    More than average number of Hurricanes? “Climate Change”
    Lower than average number of Hurricanes? “Climate Change”
    More severe storms? “Climate Change”
    Less Severe storms? “Climate Change”

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Russ D

    |

    Ben Davidson has just released this five min. video on the fraudulent data being used to ‘validate’ the AWG lie. He’s actually done some pretty valid work in exposing this and other popular hoaxes

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZH46p7MUlw

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Jerry Krause

    |

    Hi John O’Sullivan,

    Here is a link to a website whose articles I have never seen posted here at PSI.

    (https://wildfiretoday.com/2022/07/30/mckinney-fire-prompts-evacuations-northwest-of-yreka-ca/#comments). I do not know if you and PSI Readers will find a fundamental comment I have made there. So after submitting this comment I will take a look at this link to see if my comment is obvious. If not I will submit it here. The fundamental issue is the relationship between radiation and CLOUD.

    Have a good day, Jerry

    Reply

    • Avatar

      MattH

      |

      Hi Jerry.
      The observation of the cumulonimbus cloud blocking the release of infrared energy directly into the upper atmosphere and then into space is a phenomenon that is rarely clearly and simply described.

      Often cloud is treated the same way the CO2 hypothesis is treated in an attempt to debunk anthropogenic global warming. This creates ambiguity and confusion. Cloud is cloud and CO2 has differing properties.

      Surely there must be some parallels or identical physics in the way the ocean surface influences incoming energy and the way cloud influences outgoing energy.

      I note the confusing article written by Professor Anders Nordenfelt (Physics) which opens with;
      As I have described previously on this blog there appears to be a group of people, here denoted the Lukewarmers, whose mission is to convince people that the Greenhouse Effect is not the Greenhouse Effect.

      Greenhouse effect? Is Co2 being referred to by Greenhouse Effect or cloud being referred to as Greenhouse Effect or do we have people who should know better combining cloud and CO2 together as if cloud and CO2 have the same properties and effects.

      To further confuse is the energy captured or released during the phase changes of H2O.

      Thank you Jerry, for once again illustrating this fundamental issue which is clouds are not CO2.

      If they can not explain it simply they do not know it well enough.

      Kind regards. Matt

      Reply

  • Avatar

    John O'Sullivan

    |

    Thanks, Jerry, appreciate the link and your involvement in the discussion.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via