Study Shows Urban Heat Skewed U.S. Warming Data For Over A Century
Media reports are laced with unsubstantiated claims that man is overheating his planet. Every time climate change is mentioned in a story, even features in a newspaper’s food or fashion pages, it is understood that humans are turning Earth into a muggy greenhouse by burning fossil fuels. [emphasis, links added]
No evidence is provided to corroborate the claim. Man-made global warming just is, and skeptics are deplorables.
But the facts tell a different story.
Roy Spencer, a University of Alabama-Huntsville climate scientist, has determined that:
“65% of the U.S. linear warming trend between 1895 and 2023 was due to increasing population density at the suburban and urban stations; 8% of the warming was due to urbanization at rural stations. Most of that (urban heat island) effect warming occurred before 1970.”
In other words, man has built heat sinks, which skew the temperature data upward.
Researchers have known about the urban heat island effect for almost two centuries. It “is mostly due to the replacement of vegetation and aerated soils with buildings and impervious pavement.”
Spencer and co-authors John Christy and William Braswell explain that “global warming trends calculated for land areas have been spuriously inflated” because “most surface air temperature measurements are made in or near human settlements, and most of those settlements have grown over time.”
It’s inarguable that urban settings have amplified temperature readings. Three years ago, the Heartland Institute published a paper written by meteorologist Anthony Watts, which demonstrated that the ground-based system for measuring surface temperatures in the U.S. is unreliable.
A follow-up to a 2009 study, the report noted that:
“…approximately 96% of U.S. temperature stations fail to meet what the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) considers to be ‘acceptable,’ uncorrupted placement. These findings strongly undermine the legitimacy and the magnitude of the official consensus on long-term climate warming trends.”
The stations that have been recording tainted data are “located next to exhaust fans of air conditioning units, surrounded by asphalt parking lots and roads, located on blistering-hot rooftops, or placed near sidewalks and buildings that absorb and radiate heat.”
Nine of 10 stations failed to meet the National Weather Service’s “own siting requirements, which stipulate that stations must be 30 meters (100 feet) or more away from an artificial or radiating/reflecting heat source.”
See more here Climate Dispatch
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi PST Readers,
From the invention of the first thermometer, most air temperatures of record have been measured near well populated locations (towns and cities).
However, as soon the technology allowed, air temperatures, dew point temperatures, solar radiations, winds, precipitations at many remote locations and are available (RAWS USA Climate Archive).. There can be no better climatic weather data than this RAWS data. So I hope to read more about others making use of IT.
Have a good day
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi I & I Editorial Board,
I have gone to your web-site and read each of your resumes. I found nothing in them which indicated any of you have had any experience with WHAT is commonly referred to as SCIENCE. Yet you write this article about a topic which I consider to be SCIENTIFIC.
Therefore, I consider you were ignorant about the existence of the RAWS USA Climate Archive and its critically significant DATA. Such ignorance of authors is a PROBLEM.
Have a good day
Reply
Godfrey Jones
| #
Jerry,
Did you go to the source of the article, Roy Spencer, a University of Alabama-Huntsville climate scientist, and read his research? I’ll wager you didn’t, or if you did, you didn’t understand it.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Godfrey,
I was active on Roy Spenser’s web-site before I discovered PSI. It is very easy to tell someone that they don’t understand something. I ask questions like: HAVE YOU OBSERVED THAT ATMOSPHERIC AIR TEMPERATURE HAS NEVER BEEN MEASURED TO BE LESS THAN ITS DEW POINT TEMPERATURE when both are measured at the same place and time? So if all thecarbon dioxide was removed from the atmosphere; the atmospheric temperature could not be any lower!
Have a good day
Reply