Smoking gun: Dr Fauci admits COVID test has fatal flaw
OK, here we go. Smoking gun. Jackpot. Right from the horse’s mouth. Right from the man we’re told is the number-one COVID expert in the nation. What Fauci says is golden truth. Well, how about THIS?
July 16, 2020, podcast, “This Week in Virology”: Tony Fauci makes a point of saying the PCR COVID test is useless and misleading when the test is run at “35 cycles or higher.” A positive result, indicating infection, cannot be accepted or believed.
Here, in techno-speak, is an excerpt from Fauci’s key quote (starting at about the 4-minute mark [1]):
“…If you get [perform the test at] a cycle threshold of 35 or more…the chances of it being replication-confident [aka accurate] are miniscule…you almost never can culture virus [detect a true positive result] from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…”
Each “cycle” of the test is a quantum leap in amplification and magnification of the test specimen taken from the patient.
Too many cycles, and the test will turn up all sorts of irrelevant material that will be wrongly interpreted as relevant.
That’s called a false positive.
What Fauci failed to say on the video is: the FDA, which authorizes the test for public use, recommends the test should be run up to 40 cycles. Not 35.
Therefore, all labs in the US that follow the FDA guideline are knowingly or unknowingly participating in fraud. Fraud on a monstrous level, because…
Millions of Americans are being told they are infected with the virus on the basis of a false positive result, and…
The total number of COVID cases in America—which is based on the test—is a gross falsity.
The lockdowns and other restraining measures are based on these fraudulent case numbers.
Let me back up and run that by you again. Fauci says the test is useless when it’s run at 35 cycles or higher. The FDA says run the test up to 40 cycles, in order to determine whether the virus is there. This is the crime in a nutshell.
If anyone in the White House has a few brain cells to rub together, pick up a giant bullhorn and start revealing the truth to the American people.
“Hello, America, you’ve been tricked, lied to, conned, and taken for a devastating ride. On the basis of fake science, the country was locked down.”
If anyone in the Congress has a few brain cells operating, pull Fauci into a televised hearing and, in ten minutes, make mincemeat out of the fake science that has driven this whole foul, stench-ridden assault on the US economy and its citizens.
All right, here are two chunks of evidence for what I’ve written above. First, we have a CDC quote on the FDA website, in a document titled [2]: “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel For Emergency Use Only.” See page 35. This document is marked, “Effective: 07/13/20.” That means, even though the virus is being referred to by its older name, the document is still relevant as of July 2020. “For Emergency Use Only” refers to the fact that the FDA has certified the PCR test under a traditional category called “Emergency Use Authorization.”
FDA: “…a specimen is considered positive for 2019-nCoV [virus] if all 2019-nCoV marker (N1, N2) cycle threshold growth curves cross the threshold line within 40.00 cycles (< 40.00 Ct).”
Naturally, MANY testing labs reading this guideline would conclude, “Well, to see if the virus is there in a patient, we should run the test all the way to 40 cycles. That’s the official advice.”
Then we have a New York Times article (August 29/updated September 17) headlined: “Your coronavirus test is positive. Maybe it shouldn’t be.” [3] Here are money quotes:
“Most tests set the limit at 40 [cycles]. A few at 37.”
“Set the limit” would usually mean, “We’re going to look all the way to 40 cycles, to see if the virus is there.”
The Times: “This number of amplification cycles needed to find the virus, called the cycle threshold, is never included in the results sent to doctors and coronavirus patients…”
Boom. That’s the capper, the grand finale. Labs don’t or won’t reveal their collusion in this crime.
Get the picture?
I hope so.
If a lawyer won’t go to court with all this, or if a judge won’t pay attention and see the light, they should be stripped of their jobs and sent to the Arctic to sell snow.
SOURCES:
[1] https://youtu.be/a_Vy6fgaBPE?t=260
[2] https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
[3] nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html
About the author: Jon Rappoport has written three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe
Read more at blog.nomorefakenews.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Trackback from your site.
Brian James
| #
Nov 6, 2020 Irish doctor interview: “The Price Of Truth”. Witness…#Leadership.
A compassionate and emotionally charged interview with a brave Irish doctor, one who tried to speak up. To speak up for a balanced and proportionate response to this challenging viral issue.
https://youtu.be/_WbKl2gPo4Y
Reply
Joseph Olson
| #
perfect 2020 vision > fake WuFlu to force easy to forge “mail in” ballots > then HACK !
“Interview on Electronic Vote Fraud” by CD Media with Russ Ramsland, linked SGTreports
Worldwide election rigging > https://youtu.be/ficae6x1Q5A
Reply
Tom O
| #
A quote –
“If anyone in the White House has a few brain cells to rub together, pick up a giant bullhorn and start revealing the truth to the American people.”
To the author – This comment is anal. “Anyone in the White House” has been tweeting this, really, the ONLY “bullhorn” “anyone in the White House has.” I’m not on Twitter nor Farcebook. Believe it or not, I will bet there are millions of Americans just like me, that think that the controlled social medias are NOT worth the time to waste on them.
The BULLHORNs are all in the hands of the Bullshiners – the left, the media, the globalists, not “anyone in the White House.” I am tired of these idiot “Eureka” moments that all say the same thing using different examples, then blaming the situation on “anyone in the White House.”
So why aren’t YOU jumping up on social media and shouting from the highest steeple your momentous findings? what? You say it gets censored? Welcome to the real world. The one that “anyone in the White House” has to deal with as well.
Reply
Chris
| #
He might be preparing his defense. This will give the ability to claim that he didn’t mislead the public. So it will be critical for prosecution to show a timeline of his statements. But from this point forward anyone who still relies on his statements will not be able to say it was because of what he said. Although the damage had already been done and increasing.
Reply
RT
| #
Since the virus has not been identified, and mapped. How can you have a definitive test for it?. The PCR is only a method for growing samples for manufacturing. Not testing for a virus.
Reply
Charles Higley
| #
As no one has isolated this virus and shown that it is specific to the symptoms, because of the presence of other viruses that are often present, it is impossible to have a PCR test, antibody test, or vaccine that are at all specific and useful is impossible. The genetic sequence of the supposed virus was deduced from 37 base pairs and the other 30,000 base pairs filled in by a computer program. So, any PCR test primers that supposedly make the test specific are going to be based on already known coronavirus sequences, making the test patently nonspecific. That is why the PCR test recognizes coronaviruses, the common cold, and even human DNA. Yeah, that’s a useful test. It is useful indeed if you dupe the public into believing that it is a proven specific test. The public has been gas-lighted.
As the PCR test is so nonspecific, it is not surprise that we have mounting positive results all over the place. For the idea of identifying a virus that no one has actually defined, it’s like the virus does not exist.
As the symptoms are so wide and varied and the flu season is a salad of influenza and coronaviruses, it is most likely that we are looking at multiple infections and a syndrome, not a real individual virus.;
It all comes back to this virus being a ghost perpetuated as a scourge.
Reply
Stephen Malthouse, MD
| #
This extract from the CDC’s RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel Instruction for Use (Catalog # 2019-nCoVEUA-01, p. 39) appears to state that they did not use SARS-CoV-2 to make the PCR kit:
“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full-length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titre (RNA copies/uL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.”
Reply
K Kaiser
| #
And now to the latest (related) news:
— 17 million minks raised in Denmark are to be culled ( https://www.wsj.com/articles/denmark-to-cull-17-million-mink-after-coronavirus-mutation-found-11604592156 )
— “The novel coronavirus has found a new victim: Denmark’s entire population of farmed mink has been ordered culled after researchers discovered the animals harbor new mutations of the virus that threaten the effectiveness of a future vaccine and are now spreading to humans.”
Reply
Dean Michael Jackson
| #
“Smoking Gun: Dr Fauci Admits COVID Test Has Fatal Flaw”
Another Marxist posting that refers to Kary Mullis’ PCR amplification tool as a “test”.
Once again for the benefit of those non-Marxists reading:
The PCR is an amplification tool, meaning it multiplies up to billions of nucleotide sequences. The PCR doesn’t know what DNA sequence it has, nor can it detect a specific sequence. The PCR can only detect quantity via a green fluorescent dye that’s released by an attaching enzyme called a reporter [gene]. That’s it. Very simple.
A contaminated swab to the back of the throat, the PCR has no clue what the identity of the target DNA is or if it is the pathogen creating disease.[1]
When the PCR amplification passes the ‘threshold’ phase, the green dye kicks in, and the greater the difference between pre-threshold stage (which uses different color dyes) and post threshold stage, determines the ‘viral load’ presence of a pathogen, we’re told. Of course, nothing is determined because an amplification tool simply amplifies, so if one increases amplification from 20X to 25X, naturally the nucleotide sequences increase, and so on until amplification of 60x will obtain a 100% positivity rate 100% of the time! The PCR cannot determine “viral load”, since viral load can only be assessed by directly analyzing a subject’s blood.
At my blog, read the articles…
‘House of Cards: The Collapse of the ‘Collapse’ of the USSR’
‘Playing Hide And Seek In Yugoslavia’
Then read the article, ‘The Marxist Co-Option Of History And The Use Of The Scissors Strategy To Manipulate History Towards The Goal Of Marxist Liberation’
Solution
The West will form new political parties where candidates are vetted for Marxist ideology/blackmail, the use of the polygraph to be an important tool for such vetting. Then the West can finally liberate the globe of vanguard Communism.
My blog…
https://djdnotice.blogspot.com/2018/09/d-notice-articles-article-55-7418.html
[1] The back of the throat has many pathogens, or DNA pieces, where the amplification tool will process the contaminated DNA sequences unless the target DNA sequence is obtained using proper medical/research isolation procedures, which does not include the back of the [contaminated] throat!
Reply
Alder
| #
Dr Fauci tells us what we already know, but we welcome that extra support.
There was a NYT article saying the same thing. Who copied who?
Well, that is the good news. The bad news is that an endorsement from Fauci is a mixed blessing.
Reply