Seven Decades of Net Solar Radiation
Imagine thinking that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate (IPCC) is an actual legitimate scientific organization and seeing this diagram:
“Woah” you think to yourself. “Look at what humans have done!”
Notice, there is one natural factor: “Solar Irradiance”. But what they don’t tell you is that this is solar variation at the top of the atmosphere!
What’s been going on at the bottom of the atmosphere for 7 decades?
And then you realize what kind of a blatant fraud the IPCC really is.
3 W/m2 over ~70 years or 4 W/m2 over ~35 years completely wipes away their nonsense.
But facts won’t stop them from playing their little game of blaming those they want to punish, sad to say.
Alternate View
Image source: climexp.knmi
See more here: phzoe.com
Header image: Russia Today
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Zoe, MattH, John O’, and PSI Readers,
Two words: believe—know. I know somethings and only believe other things. I know the people, to whom I address this comment, exist but I only believe they might read this comment when it is posted at the PSI website.
I know historical facts. I, based upon my experiences, claim to know that a person, with the name of Albert Einstein, stated: “The only source of knowledge is experience.” as well as: “If you can’t explain it simply, you don’t understand it well enough.”
And I accept these statements as historical facts, not as someone’s idea (theory). For I am a SCIENTIST and I know the human activity termed SCIENCE didn’t exist 500 years ago. For I know that the book, written and published in the common Italian language, was a historical record of what a person, by the name of Galileo Galilei, had reasoned, done, and wrote, which was the BEGINNING of SCIENCE.
Which today, I know some EVIL PEOPLE ARE TRYING TO DESTROY. So I fight against this EVIL effort by trying to remind possible readers about this short history of SCIENCE what the people who practiced SCIENCE have accomplished; which had not been accomplished in the thousands of years before. However, I must acknowledge that the common PEOPLE, who survived for these prior thousands of years, did, without the KNOWLEDGE of Galileo’s SCIENCE, INTUITIVELY practice it.
Have a good day, Jerry
Reply
JaKo
| #
Hi Jerry,
As always, a meaningful comment about science; however, times are changing!
You said: “…without the KNOWLEDGE of Galileo’s SCIENCE, INTUITIVELY practice(d) it.”
That may have been in the past; NOT ANY MORE sir. If the sentence (it can’t be an idea) “Science is settled” gains any traction, persons providing this traction are hopelessly uneducated and brainwashed and, I’m afraid, in majority.
Cheers, JaKo
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi JaKo,
I cannot worry about others; others must worry about themselves. I just learned of a graduating high school who wrote his greatest influence during his high school years was Job of the OT and Paul.of the NT.
We have to believe that God is directing traffic as he had in the past and one just needs to try to do what one believes best with the knowledge that everyones knows what is good or evil.
Have a good day, Jerry
Reply
Jakie
| #
Well said!!!
Extremely Well Said~!!!
Reply
T. C. Clark
| #
Temp went down from about 1940 to 1980 while CO2 went up about 15%….waiting…waiting…for IPCC explanation. The IPCC does not explain…maybe not acknowledge that climate cycles for the last 8000 years have not been explained by the climate experts of IPCC. The subject is complex….it involves long periods of time….and this is how IPCC has been getting away with the “science is settled…97% scientists agree”…blah blah blah.
Reply
Barry
| #
To think that you can call 30 or forty years of wx climate is rediculous the IPCC are simply propaganda spinners. Wx happens over decades,climate happens over centuries if not millennia. This chicken little approach is meant for controlling the masses and nothing else. And admittedly it is working very well as most of the brain dead now believe even though there is absolutely no science to back up their rediculous claims
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi PSI Editor and Readers,
On my shelves of used books, I just found THE MEANING OF IT ALL (1998) by Richard P. Feynman. It is a transcript of a three lecture series, the John Dana Lectures, given at the University of Washington April 23, April 25, April 27, 1963. The titles of the lectures were: The Uncertainty of Science, The Uncertainty of Values, and The Uncertainty Age. It seems I paid $8.00 for this mint condition book whose dust jacket lists its price was $22.00. I am uncertain when I acquired this and I have no memory of reading it; but someone had underlined a few sentences of the first lecture.
I plan to entirely read it because it seems CERTAIN we are now living in The Uncertainty Age. And given the TIME I would encourage other PSI Readers to get an inexpensive used copy to read this book. So, to give an idea of what you might read I will quote the underlined sentences of the first lecture.
“This is the excitement, the pay you get for all the disciplined thinking and hard work. The work is not done for the sake of an application. It is done for the excitement of what is found out. … But see that the imagination of nature is far, far greater than the imagination of man. No one who did not have some inkling of this through observations could have imagined such a marvel as nature is. … If you look closely enough at anything, you will see that there is nothing more exciting than the truth, the pay dirt of the scientist, discovered by his painstaking efforts. … This method is based on the principle that observation is the judge of whether something is so or not. All other aspects and characteristics of science can be understood directly when we understand that observation is the ultimate and final judge of the truth of an idea. But “prove” used in this way really means “test,” … The exceptions to any rule are most interesting in themselves, for they show us that the old rule is wrong. … The scientist tries to find more exceptions, a process that is continually exciting as it develops. He does not try to avoid showing that rules are wrong; there is progress and excitement in the exact opposite. He tries to prove himself wrong as quickly as possible. … Scientific reasoning requires a certain discipline, and we should try to teach this discipline, because even on the lowest level such errors are unnecessary today. … There is no authority who decides what is a good idea.”
This last underlined statement is on page 21 of 28. So I read on to see if there is anything more to underline. Of course there are. However, I must caution a Reader that the previously underlined statements were not the only important ones that needed underlining. “There is no authority who decides what is a good idea.”
Sometimes I have written Have a good idea instead of Have a good day, Jerry. It works too.
Reply