RESCHEDULED: Livestream Lecture! Planetary Physics 201: Earth’s Temperature (Sept. 16, 2023, 8pm MDT)

(sorry if you watched the original attempt! – the laptop Bluetooth for wireless mic connection is unstable…will perform on PC!)

This livestream (Sept. 16, 2023, 8pm MDT) will be the first time in history where the entire temperature structure of the Earth’s surface and atmosphere (i.e., the troposphere) is explained all in one place, in one lecture.

This has literally never happened before, anywhere, or in any university, although it easily could and should have.

Join me for this academia-shaking lecture and include yourself as one of the ones who was there to witness this original and paradigm-shattering scientific event! The lecture will be open to questions which you can provide via the livestream chat, and I will also ask the audience occasional questions throughout the lecture just as would be experienced in a real university classroom.

Please join me for this interactive livestream lecture on Planetary Physics and solving Earth’s temperature without an undefinable “greenhouse effect”. This lecture would nominally be directed to 2nd-year university students in an astrophysics or physics major, but do not worry if you’re not in such a program as I will explain all concepts.

Are you ready to end the chokehold which the enemy forces of irrationality have over modern science, government, and politics? After this event, things will be different. Join me in making it happen!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3iQwvZJAmZ0

Source: climateofsophistry.com

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend the Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (7)

  • Avatar

    Herb Rose

    |

    Joe continues to accept the false premises and physics that the believers in man caused climate change do and uses math that has no connection with reality. Since the density of mass changes with altitude you cannot treat the atmosphere as constant during changes in altitude. Saying the temperature decreases at a constant rate in the troposphere ignores the change in mass.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    crackpot

    |

    At one point, a single temperature of -18C is derived. This assumes a heat loss due to radiation to space that’s the same all over the globe. However, loss (W/m^2) is a highly non-linear function of local temperature, T^4. In reality, the sunside equator radiates way more than than the poles, and so on, so the total Watts rejected will not come out the same as a uniformly warm globe’s would.

    Further, the heating due to internal fission in the Earth must be considered.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Herb Rose

      |

      Hi Crackpot,
      I think I saw your name in the chat box. I could not get logged in to leave comments. Here is a question you can ask Joe. If the surface of the Earth is heating the atmosphere how can the temperature over the ocean ever be greater than the surface temperature of the water?
      Herb

      Reply

  • Avatar

    Gary Ashe

    |

    Only a quarter of the earths surface is warming at any given time, the other 3 quarters is cooling at all different rates, only the quarter in the time zone from sun up until mid day is warming.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    james McGinn

    |

    Joe is delusional on his “cold cannot heat hot” notion. All object release radiation constantly. Therefore all object (regardless of temperature, except absolute zero) can be said to be heating all objects in their vicinity. So his assertion that only hotter objects can heat cooler objects is just nonsense. The stubborn fool does not realize that he has misinterpreted one of the laws of thermodynamics which correctly states that cooler objects cannot INCREASE THE TEMPERATURE of hotter objects, which obviously has a very different meaning that what he stated.

    Also he is completely delusional about H2O (there is no such thing as latent heat of condensation). But this is okay since everybody but me carries this same delusion.

    James McGinn / Genius
    Paradigm of Confusion
    https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/episodes/Paradigm-of-Confusion-e29bn6j/a-aabvr8m

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Herb Rose

      |

      Hi James.
      The 2nd law of thermodynamics is wrong because it talks of temperature instead of energy. Objects do not radiate or transfer mass, only energy. When objects collide they follow the law of conservation of momentum. An object with greater velocity (energy) will add velocity to an object with less energy, regardless of the masses of the objects. I you run a small car into the back of a large slower truck the car will slow down even though the truck has more kinetic energy.
      Herb

      Reply

    • Avatar

      Kevin Doyle

      |

      James ‘Genius’ McGinn,
      I really believe you are missing a financial opportunity here. Imagine how much money you could make as a consultant to GE or the U.S. Navy explaining to them that they’ve had it wrong for the past 150 years! Those fools must have no idea how steam turbines and condensing units work. But now they have your brilliance to show them the error of their ways! Imagine how much you could save them!
      We are truly blessed with your Genius!

      Oh, and didn’t the Bugs Bunny character Wiley Coyote carry a business card declaring himself a ‘Genius’? It’s unfortunate he never caught that Road Runner…

      Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via