The International COVID Summit 4 will focus beyond the scope of Covid and cover the many crisis the world is facing today

This paper compares the ideas contained in the main papers published on climate change since World War II to arrive at a suggested consensus of our present knowledge regarding climatic changes and their causes

Facts and data show “three strikes and climate alarmism should be out,” climate truth-teller Steve Milloy told PJ Media

Minister pledges to turn Queensland into the ‘vaccine capital of Australia.’

People are reportedly spending more time taking prescription drugs than they might spend in their first marriage, getting an education, or working

From 20 million-year-old fossils to brand-new molecules, girls rule in the arena of outstanding science finds

A few days ago the Epoch Times published a long feature about Dr. Peter McCullough’s three-year investigation of mRNA vaccines and his bold challenge of the most basic and beloved premise of the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex

More answers to why some people had serious adverse effects and others did not

In another “How the hell did this paper pass peer-review?” incident, we find yet another PNAS absurdity by Daniel Vecellio and colleagues (Link), that is described by a truly awful summary in Science Daily here

Most funeral practices leave pollution behind. Can ‘aquamation’ change that?

In this video I demonstrate that despite whatever ambiguous argument advocates wish to use to explain the radiative greenhouse mechanism, they all have the same effect, which is to cause a temperature gradient with altitude in the atmosphere

New Zealand allowed over 11,000 of its key health staff to get COVID-19 vaccination exemptions while urging the public to get vaccinated

In the battle against time, the body’s muscles face a relentless foe: aging

Early research shows reason for concern, finding microplastics can cause inflammation and oxidative stress in mice and accumulate in animal organs

Wouldn’t it be fantastic if those legislators, regulators and health experts who supported the problematic COVID pandemic policies and the claim the COVID-19 so-called “vaccines” were “safe and effective” would come and exchange views in the open. It has not happened previously