I need your help to collect this information. Nobody else seems to be asking the question – are even the unjabbed now at an increased risk of cancer? And is it from being near those who are jabbed?

Every American wants some authoritative entity to carry out investigations and stop actual terrorists. We want the FBI to operate as it was intended. Same can be said for the DOJ, health agencies, Congress, etc.

Starting in the mid-20th century, companies began distorting and manpulating science to favor specific commercial interests

I woke up this Tuesday morning and I had gained 300 followers overnight. I was baffled given my personalized algorithms are rigged for suppression. I dont have freedom of reach. UNLESS that is, someone with sway shares my content.

Vaccination during the third trimester of pregnancy is unprecedented and risky, since a vaccine induced fever could precipitate stillbirth or premature delivery of the baby. The CDC and the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex has told young mothers they should take the risk for theoretical protect of the newborn.

We are now four years into the COVID-19 pandemic. After hundreds if not thousands of physician media appearances, OPEDs, peer-reviewed publications and public presentations, the US House of Representatives will finally host medical specialists who have vast experience in treating SARS-CoV-2 infections and managing the injuries resulting from COVID-19 vaccination.

On March 23, 2020, Dr. Vladimir Zelenko announced his treatment protocol for COVID-19, which consisted of risk stratifying patients as high-risk vs low-risk, and treating the high-risk patients with a multidrug therapy consisting of a five-day treatment with hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, and zinc sulfate.

When Bobby Kennedy talked about writing this book a couple of years ago, I asked him, Why?

A recent article at ABC News titled, “2023 was the year of record heat temperatures,” makes a slew of claims about global warming in 2023, including that extreme heat is becoming more common and more disastrous. These claims are misleading.

A study by Julia R. Andreasen and colleagues looked at the changes in ice shelves, Antarctic-wide, using MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) satellite data from 2009 to 2019.

The latest example of pointless virtue-signaling, intended to help ‘save the planet’, has shown itself to be inadequate for its intended role.

It is not surprising that various COVID-19 “vaccine” injury compensation schemes have arisen following the rollout of the jabs which have been reported to be associated with the highest rate and absolute number of serious adverse events worldwide compared to any “vaccine” product in history.

The allure of seamlessly blending modern, instrumental climate records with paleoclimate data obtained through proxies like tree rings and ice cores is undeniable. It promises a comprehensive view of Earth’s thermal history, stretching back millennia. However, before succumbing to this tempting shortcut, we must acknowledge its profound ethical and scientific challenges. This article delves into these challenges, arguing that splicing modern data onto proxies is, at best, dubious science and, at worst, a gross misrepresentation of Earth’s climatic past.

You don’t allow it to be researched or produced. This isn’t hard to understand.

We should not forget the damage caused by the mainstream media and the individual news anchor buffoons who parroted brainless advice thus scaring millions into the experimental gene-based jabs whether they needed it or not.