Thousands of children skipped school last week to march in the streets and demand government action about the hypothetical threat that human industrial activity will change the Earth’s climate.

It would have been better if the students had stayed in school and learned something about real science.

Why are the Greens and politicians so blind to the true costs of the radical environmentalism they promote?

For renewables such as wind and solar, to get the same energy production as we have now, we would need cover very large areas of the land surface with them. Is that even sane?

When the wind is not blowing and the sun is not shining, countries with no ‘fossil fuel’ or nuclear generating capability would have frequent or extended power blackouts, as has happened in Australia twice in the last 18 months, and here in the UK a couple weeks ago.

Despite the Arctic warming twice as fast as anywhere else in the world, critical indicator species like polar bears, ice seals, and walruses are thriving.

In two new recently-released GWPF videos, Dr. Susan Crockford, a Canadian wildlife expert, explains why Arctic marine mammal species are flourishing despite declining summer sea ice.

More than 500 scientists and professionals in climate and related fields have sent a “European Climate Declaration” to the Secretary-General of the United Nations asking for a long-overdue, high-level, open debate on climate change.

Late-1800s German land-use debates spawned the pseudoscience of Ecology.

On the countryside front, one camp promoted cropland expansion through hydrological engineering (river-straightening, wetland drainage) and through forest and hedge-row clearances. They dreamed of vast unbroken planes farmed with the latest methods. Their opponents defended time-honoured, small-plot, labour-intensive farming.

Over the weekend, climate change activists associated with teen Greta Thunberg’s Climate Strike movement took to the streets, demanding “action” on climate.

On Monday, climate activists tried to “Shut Down DC,” resulting in more carbon emissions as cars stall in worse traffic.

What kind of monster afflicts children with eco-anxiety by telling them they will be dead in 12 years? I’ll tell you who: the child abusers in the establishment media, the environmental movement and sick politicians — that’s who.

Of course you mean CO2-driven climate change, not mere climate change, which has been happening forever due to all kinds of natural forces.

It’s the claim that despite being a trace element in the atmosphere (0.04{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}), CO2 single-handedly drives climate change, specifically, global warming.

Facebook removed a false label on an editorial that expresses skepticism about the effectiveness of climate models after the scientists who authored the piece said the company relied on partisan activists to fact check their op-ed.

A Facebook spokeswoman confirmed on background the company removed the label. The decision comes shortly after scientists Caleb Rossiter and Patrick Michaels argued their point in a Sept. 10 letter to CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

Feathers at the foot of a wind turbine. Bird droppings at the base of a solar panel. A coroner could use these signs to establish the cause of mass bird death. And a novelist could pen a murder mystery titled: Death by Renewable Energy.

In a recent interview with the online Berliner Zeitung (BZ) here, economist Björn Lomborg (pictured) said that 16-year old Greta Thunberg’s demands “will put people in danger”.

Greta, the Swedish teenage activist is calling for radical cuts in CO2 emissions – on a scale that would have profound impacts on the world’s market system.

SCoPEx is an acronym for “Stratospheric Controlled Perturbation Experiment,” and it’s the name of a new Bill Gates-funded global genocide experiment designed to eliminate most living humans by collapsing the biosphere.

Environment Canada omitted a century’s worth of observed weather data in developing its computer models on the impacts of climate change. Suspicious?

Abstract: Present day treatises dealing with weather and climate often use seemingly physical quantities, while they are in fact averages of such. Inserting these into formulas is physically not permitted.

The first iron rule of American politics is: Follow the money. This explains, oh, about 80 percent of what goes on in Washington.

Shortly after the latest “Chicken Little” climate change report was published last month, I noted on CNN that one reason so many hundreds of scientists are persuaded that the sky is falling is that they are paid handsomely to do so.