How we think and talk about climate policy is profoundly shaped by 31 different computer models that produce a wide range of scenarios of the future, starting from the base year of 2005.

With 2020 right around the corner, we now have enough experience to ask how well these models are doing. Based on my preliminary analysis reported below, the answer appears to be not so well.

Curtin University researchers have discovered that a global ice age more than 600 million years ago dramatically altered the face of the planet, leaving a barren, flooded landscape and clear oceans.

The research, published in Terra Nova, examined how distinctive carbonate sedimentary rocks formed over the course of millions of years after the Snowball Earth.

In this video I discuss the fallacious reasoning which people sometimes resort to when confronted with the fact that the only theoretical foundation for the climate alarmist greenhouse effect comes from flat earth theory.

In Japan, like many other places around the world, the media like to tell audiences how sea surface temperatures around Japan are rising due to man-made global warming.

But, as is often the case, the data and facts tell the opposite story.

Pertinent work that is worthwhile for wider consideration that are buried and lost in the overwhelming, pervasive AGW propaganda from governments, media and academia are summarized below:

Some early Tesla models are spontaneously malfunctioning and could cost owners more than $1,800 to repair.

The issue stems from a worn-out flash memory chip embedded in the Multi-Media Controller board that activates the control screen and executes most functions.

Mainstream climate science claims CO2 molecules “slow down the rate of heat loss from the surface” as a blanket does.

And yet the rate at which a CO2 molecule retains or slows down heat loss is, at most, a negligible 0.0001 of a second.

General Paul E. Vallely (Major General, USA, Ret.) was interviewed by show host Mike Filip on AmeriCanuck Internet Radio of Canada, October 14, 2019.

In a wide-ranging interview Filip and Vallely talked about Q-Anon, Antifa, the Deep State, politics, and the biggest threats facing the US.

Background: A good six years ago, Potsdam climate researcher Stefan Rahmstorf was outraged by the German Weather Service (DWD) at his at Klimalounge site.

The DWD had the audacity to contradict Mr. Rahmstorf.

Retired Principal Scientific Officer (PSO) for the British Government exposes “discrepancies” in NASA’s Global Historical Climate Network (GHCN) which serve to make recent temperatures seem warmer.

The “mistakes” point to possible fraud intended to give scientific credence to tax raising UK and US climate policies.

Abstract: In this essay we review how easy it is to make a wrong assumption (have a wrong idea) with possible serious consequences that hinders positive progress.  And from time to time we consider comments to Part 1 made by Michael Clarke and JLK.

It’s amazing that self-proclaimed environmental activists can point fingers from their city dwellings and accuse farmers of destroying the environment.

Recently, a great fuss was made of the fact that farmers in Brazil were burning off their fields in preparation for the growing season.

The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) agrees human CO₂ is only 5 percent and natural CO₂ is 95 percent of the CO₂ inflow into the atmosphere. The ratio of human to natural CO₂ in the atmosphere must equal the ratio of the inflows.

I just had a very long conversation with an academic colleague here at work, one who I’ve actually anonymously quoted before in my videos and on some posts. He is of the climate alarmist persuasion.

Before we spend tens of trillions of dollars on green new mis-dealings that collapse our economy and decimate our reliable energy infrastructure to save the planet from climatological Armageddon, let’s first consider some unsettling scientific questions regarding any “settled science” basis for hysteria.