Statistical analysis of official data from the Mauna Loa Observatory of atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) reveals Nature, not humans determines the concentration of this trace gas.

Variances in atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide are shown to be well correlated with changes in the seasons, phases of the moon and El Niño events rather than human industrial activity.

In two articles published this past week here at Climate Realism, we showed how Al Gore’s predictions about melting glaciers in Glacier National Park and disappearing snows at Mt. Kilimanjaro have proven spectacularly wrong.

Those were the only two concrete predictions Gore made with a definitive timeline prior to today in his book, An Inconvenient Truth.

A secretly recorded meeting between the editors-in-chief of The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine reveal both men bemoaning the “criminal” influence big pharma has on scientific research.

On June 3, 2020, NPJ Climate and Atmospheric Science published a study by Athanasiadis et al. 2020, in which the authors investigated the question of whether changes in the frequency of blocked weather situations in the North Atlantic and Central European region are predictable.

This study by John D Scott reports ACA rashes on Lyme disease patients for the first time in Canada. The author sheds new light on the predominant B. burgdorferi sensu stricto genospecies in North America acting as a potential contagion in the pathogenesis of ACA.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation helped negotiate who would score a $100 Billion government-backed contact tracing contract in August 2019 — six months before the ‘pandemic’ arrived in the United States and four months before it swept through China.

After the George Floyd killing and subsequent turmoil, there’s an awful lot being written about black people being unfairly killed by police. But what are the facts?

Just in case 2020 wasn’t crazy enough, the Environmental Protection Agency recently announced rolled back regulations for companies due to the coronavirus outbreak paving the way for companies to skirt environmental laws and regulations during this declared crisis.

Everyone in the world seems confused about whether or not we should wear masks to protect us from the coronavirus. The general consensus among politicians and the so-called experts quoted in the media appears to me to be that wearing masks does no good but that we should wear them anyway and that we don’t need to wear them although they are very useful.

The woke editors of the prominent science journal Cell have published a mea culpa, accusing their entire discipline of racism.

That’s the question posed by the all-activism all-the-time BBC in Britain.

Some of us fondly remember the days when the Beeb meant I, Claudius or various adaptation of 19th-century English novels, but now it’s devolved into a tiresome globalist scold, trying to frighten the children and mental defectives into believing the world is coming to an end:

An unusual summertime snowstorm buried parts of Colorado and Wyoming on Tuesday in heavy, wet snow that piled up in higher elevations and even closed some roads.

The National Weather Service (NWS) said that winter storm warnings and winter weather advisories were issued Tuesday for areas west of Cheyenne in Wyoming and higher elevations of the Rockies in Colorado.

The media made Dr. Fauci a hero.Was it because of his superior medical knowledge or because his “wisdom” would harm Donald Trump and his re-election chances? Dr. Fauci clearly has impressive credentials but so do many other medical experts.

Psychologists are producing research referring to individuals who have resisted the mass hysteria resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic as mentally ill, claiming that they are more likely to exhibit psychopathic behavior.

According to empirical analysis of mortality data in England and Wales during the period 13^th March 2020 to 29^th May, it is possible to conclude that as many as 20,000 unexpected deaths have been caused by the UK government’s policy response to the SAR-CoV-2 virus.

The UK response to the coronavirus is fundamentally wrong. Why fundamentally? Because from the beginning, the situation has been treated homogeneously, whereas the public health risk is entirely heterogenous.