The following cogent passages are from a medical forum, on which the writer prefers to stay anonymous because presenting any narrative different than the official one can cause you a lot of stress in the toxic environment created by the scam which surrounds the alleged COVID-19 pandemic.

The National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom will begin treating coronavirus patients with plasma transfusions from those who have recently recovered from the Chinese virus.

Britain’s medicines watchdog has approved the use of blood recovered from Covid-19 patients as a treatment for the Chinese virus.

Image (Wikipedia) A low-pressure mercury-vapor discharge tube floods the inside of a biosafety cabinet with shortwave UV light when not in use, sterilizing microbiological contaminants from irradiated surfaces.

Despite what mainstream media may tell you, it is scientifically proven that viruses hate sunlight. Studies in the peer reviewed scientific literature attest to the fact that ultra-violet (UV) light can kill bacteria and viruses.

Indeed, hospitals and surgeries are increasingly employing UV lamps to disinfect and prevent flu-type viruses (including COVID19) from spreading. In this article we introduce some of the key evidence.

A new research study by researchers from Wenzhou Medical University in Zhejiang province lead by Dr Don Chen revealed that almost all Covid-19 patients exhibited hypokalemia and that supplementation with potassium ions was one of the many factors that assisted in their recovery.

Gordon  Duff, an accredited diplomat and generally accepted as one of the top global intelligence specialists, uncovers documents (below) which show that research to create COVID 19 began in the United States in 2006 and culminated in a successful bio-weapon in 2015.

A new paper shows that a selling feature of electric cars, fast-charging stations along highways, actually subject batteries to high temperatures and high resistance that can cause them to crack, leak, and lose their storage capacity.

Today, the UK scientist responsible for much of the COVID19 pandemic panic rolls retreats on his alarmism to admit only a fraction of predicted deaths are likely. As panic abates, rational minds consider when normality should be allowed to return.

Here are some thoughts on the issue.

Before his death in 2019 esteemed pathologist, Etienne de Harven (above) a celebrated pioneer in virus research, gave a warning that Big Pharma was going to dupe us with an “epidemic of fear” from an overblown virus – all to boost profits.

Regular readers will know that right from the start I have reported on www.vernoncoleman.com that I do not believe that the coronavirus is more threatening than a nasty type of flu.

On Friday night Laura Ingraham reported on the latest study by the French research team led by the renowned epidemiologist Dr. Didier Raoult was able to repeat his findings from a previous study.

image source: filmblerg.com

Take everything you think of climate change and turn it upside down. The variations in heating, cooling, and CO2 concentration in the atmosphere come from below.

Of emphasis here is the very real, minuscule uptick in CO2 which does not come from radiation sources. Of course, CO2 has nothing to do with global warming. It only feeds the plants.

Below is our list of twelve medical experts whose opinions on the Coronavirus outbreak contradict the official narratives of the MSM, and the memes so prevalent on social media.

The History Guy recalls the life of Scottish Scientist James Clerk Maxwell, whom astronomer Carl Sagan said “has done more to shape our civilization than any ten recent presidents and prime ministers.”

Multiple msm outlets have capitalized on the coronavirus outbreak to push climate change propaganda. The essential message: Hey, at least pollution is down.

The New York Times, Bloomberg News and Axios all published stories touting how the quarantines, restrictions, social distancing policies, and business shutdowns are helping climate and reducing pollution. Really.

A scan of statements made by U.S. media, state governors, local leaders, county judges, and more show many relying on the same source, an online mapping tool called COVID Act Now.  As  the predicted dire outcomes fail to materialize it seems the blame falls on a single website’s inaccurate and hyperbolic hospitalization models.