Offering Hope for Avoiding the Imminent Global Calamity
It is my honor and pleasure to bring you an appraisal of my new book, “Blinding LED Headlights: The Biggest Blunder of Modern Science” by Alan Rayner: https://lnkd.in/eXGAM5yT
Alan and I have long recognized in our own ways how mainstream physics/science and mathematics theories, understandings, and claims have been contradictory, inadequate and often dysfunctional.
Alan came to recognize Nature’s occurrences and formations through both practical observations and rigorous reasoning applied to biological organism developments.
His observations are commensurate with natural and analytic ways.
I also came to recognize that natural and physical methods can only be accurately and meaningfully described through physics and mathematics that must not use abstract theories failing to be analytic in 3D volumetric space as time emerges.
In contrast, today’s mainstream physics and math theories and claims are abstract and many fail to grasp that natural forms and occurrences are neither discrete nor rigidly bounded.
Furthermore, they fail to see that Nature’s occurrences cannot be analyzed in Cartesian coordinates and that they must graduate out of exclusively solving problems abstractly on 2D planes.
Alan’s and my objections to mainstream dogmas have been ostracized. Recently my objections to mainstream physics and math have been embraced by some people including notable scientists and mathematicians. Perhaps because many people are growing weary of the extremely glary LED headlights that most vehicles use.
Mainstream math and science communities still fail to understand just what type of spatio-temporal light distributions LED headlights generate and why such light is mentally and visually disturbing for most people. My video could help them understand why LED light patterns are very disturbing to a good number of people: https://lnkd.in/eru6_8f7.
While scientific communities have repeatedly utter the term “Lambertian light distribution”, most have no idea what this distribution is in space-time other than it being just a sphere or a circle.
They compare the Lambertian sphere with the spherical sun associating the Lambertian light distribution with the sun’s spherical light distribution. But these are two entirely different types of spheres and spherical energy distributions!
Alan has read my book several times and is still reading carefully to further understand my scientific and mathematically-backed challenges against the foundations of modern science.
He asked me to explain how the Lambertian sphere is different from the sun; I explained it via the example of a soap bubble being a Lambertian sphere! He caught on that Lambertian energy or mass distributions would only be formed from flat surfaces or apertures!
He went on to write the poem I recited in a recent video: https://lnkd.in/es2TRXmR.
Additional comment placed by me in the comments section:
I hope the current academic and industry communities of physics, mathematics, and engineering find Alan’s appraisal of my book helpful and decide to read the book to gain a notable understanding of their own.
It may just be the last hope for us to avoid the global calamity we are facing for science and humanity. I really recommend buying the hardback and passing it on to one’s favorite middle school or high school relative or friend as they will surely deal with the worst of this imminent calamity.
Header image: The Telegraph
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.