No Proof of COVID19 Causality: Is this the Crime of the Century?
Doctors are not using a licensed diagnostic tool to make the claim that all of the cases/deaths labelled as ‘COVID19’ were caused by a single new virus. They are using a RT-PCR test that specifically states “it is not a diagnostic tool for viral infections”.
Cases and deaths due to COVID19 have been collected based on many suspected (unconfirmed) cases only, and even when a laboratory test is used, the new SARSCov2 virus is not being identified in any of these ‘positive’ cases or deaths.
Proof that SARSCov2 is causing COVID19 disease has not been provided by any government health department and the Australian government stated under the Freedom of Information act that they are not using a test that 100% proves that SARSCov2 is present in any cases/deaths of COVID19 disease.
Here is the link to my article titled ‘Creating a Global Pandemic‘ that provides more detail on this manufactured pandemic in 2020 and it also describes the similarities to the polio pandemic in 1954.
Many infectious agents and non-infectious agents were known to cause the paralysis that was being observed in children in 1954. However, the medical profession claimed it was a single virus that was causing the epidemic in children and a vaccine was introduced at the same time as changes were made to diagnostic criteria for polio and surveillance of the disease.
This resulted in the decline of ‘polio’ disease, but not paralysis in the population. The scientific evidence is provided in my article.
Evidence from Doctors and Lawyers that the PCR test cannot diagnose COVID19 Disease
1. German lawyer, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, states that the RT-PCR test cannot identify SARSCOV2, the claimed cause of COVID19 disease and describes this “scamdemic” as a “crime against humanity” – A Crime against humanity’
2. A pharmacist provides the TGA’s (Australia’s drug regulator) own evidence that the PCR test cannot identify SARSCov2 – the claimed sole cause of COVID19 disease – “Will the Corona Virus Vaccine be Mandated”
3. “Doctors for the Truth” Speak out in Madrid, Denounce COVID19 “False Pandemic” – Press Conference in Spain. Crime of the Century.
4. Proof that the Pandemic was Planned with Purpose‘ – Principia Scientific International
5. There is no Deadly Pandemic: Global Report 2019-nCov Novel Coronavirus
Creating a Global Pandemic
On 1 October 2020 my article titled ‘Creating a Global Pandemic’ was published in the Masters of Health magazine. This article describes how disease statistics can hide many factors and they can be manipulated to create the appearance of a pandemic if doctors are not required to provide proof of causality for a ‘case’ or ‘death’ of the disease.
This strategy works best if you also change the definition of a ‘pandemic’ and remove the need for there to be ‘enormous numbers of deaths and illnesses’ in the community. If you only need ‘more cases than normal of a disease’ these cases can be obtained by extra surveillance of the healthy population. A strategy that has never been used to monitor for “influenza” in previous years.
This extra surveillance works best if hospitals are incentivised to monitor for ‘flu-like symptoms’ in the healthy population with extra funding – as they are in Australia.
Note that 2020 was the first time that hundreds of stations were set up to test healthy people for ‘flu-like symptoms’. Coronaviruses make up 7-15% of the respiratory viruses that cause the common cold. If healthy people had been tested for influenza in previous years, with the RT-PCR test and antibody tests, a similar number of people would have tested positive because this test identifies the family of RNA coronaviruses – not specific strains of virus or even a whole virus.
So the RT-PCR test cannot be used to diagnose ‘cases’ of COVID19 disease. Plus healthy people should never be considered ‘cases’ of disease. Yet these are the statistics that the mainstream media has been using to frighten the public about a new virus. This works best if you give it a scary name – SARSCov2 – instead of referring to it as the Novel Coronavirus 2019 – its other name. And don’t forget we are exposed to new mutated influenza viruses every year!
In Germany an independent commission of doctors investigating COVID19 has described this pandemic as the “crime of the century”.
A Description of COVID19 Disease
In 2020 we were informed there was a new disease called ‘COVID19’ that encompasses all flu-like symptoms”, as well as neurological damage that was also claimed to be caused by the virus. These symptoms have many causes; hundreds of different viruses, bacteria and even non-infectious agents cause these symptoms.
Yet the public was told that all these cases and deaths were caused by just one virus – SARSCov2.
An example of a non-infectious agent that causes COVID19 symptoms is the flu vaccine and this vaccine was mandated for the first time in many countries, including China, Italy and Australia, in 2019-20.
There is significant medical literature showing that flu vaccines increase the chance of people getting sick from coronaviruses, which are common in the population. Further, flu vaccines are also associated with causing neurological damage such as vasculitis, strokes, heart attacks, lung edema and pneumonia – other symptoms that are included in the diagnosis for ‘COVID19 disease’.
Read more at mailchi.mp
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Trackback from your site.
Alan
| #
If the PCR test does not identify Covid19, then why are health care professionals not speaking out about this? Are they afraid of losing their jobs if they are employed in the NHS.
Reply
Dean Michael Jackson
| #
“If the PCR test does not identify Covid19….”
There is no COVID-19, since it has never been isolated directly from the blood, called purification/identification…
“We have also contacted Dr Charles Calisher, who is a seasoned virologist. In 2001, Science published an “impassioned plea…to the younger generation” from several veteran virologists, among them Calisher, saying that:
[modern virus detection methods like] sleek polymerase chain reaction […] tell little or nothing about how a virus multiplies, which animals carry it, [or] how it makes people sick. [It is] like trying to say whether somebody has bad breath by looking at his fingerprint.”[3]
And that’s why we asked Dr Calisher whether he knows one single paper in which SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated and finally really purified. His answer:
I know of no such a publication. I have kept an eye out for one.
This actually means that one cannot conclude that the RNA gene sequences, which the scientists took from the tissue samples prepared in the mentioned in vitro trials and for which the PCR tests are finally being “calibrated,” belong to a specific virus — in this case SARS-CoV-2.”
https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/?fbclid=IwAR3G6Fuq8C-8XW7szL43scbKOYFx78irq52A6ZQCRdZmPMWiHTqD_2jv4Zo#4
Reply
Dean Michael Jackson
| #
No software-based test can identify a sequence of DNA nucleotides…
https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/Nucleotide
…as belonging to any particular pathogen, as inadvertently admitted by software programs (FASTA and BLAST being two such widely used software programs)…
https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi
…that search for similarities…
https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi
…when running a Query and Database Sequence
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1734/
….searching for a match between a database of billions of nucleotide sequences with that of the target nucleotide sequence being amplified. Similarity* informs us the target nucleotide can’t be identified (‘seen’) by the software, otherwise there would be a precise match with the database nucleotide sequences.
What the PCR non-test is actually identifying are the numbers of nucleotide sequences amplified in green dye. When amplification is, let’s say, 20x the software gives a negative result because it can’t detect the green-dye. When amplification is increased to 35x the PCR non-test will give a positive result approximately 5% of the time because it can detect the green dye. At 50x amplification the PCR non-test will give an 75% positivity rate. When amplification is increased to 60x, the PCR non-test gives 100% positivity.
https://principia-scientific.com/ny-times-nine-out-of-ten-covid19-tests-are-wrong/
What the PCR non-test is actually identifying is the green dye(!):
“SYBR® Green I is a commonly used fluorescent dye that binds double-stranded DNA molecules by intercalating between the DNA bases. It is used in quantitative PCR because the fluorescence can be measured at the end of each amplification cycle to determine, relatively or absolutely, how much DNA has been amplified.”
https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/life-science/molecular-biology/pcr/quantitative-pcr/sybr-green-based-qpcr.html#:~:text=SYBR%C2%AE%20Green%20I%20is,much%20DNA%20has%20been%20amplified.
If the green dye is removed from the PCR non-test, the result of the non-test will show 0% positivity 100% of the time!
At my blog, read the articles…
‘House of Cards: The Collapse of the ‘Collapse’ of the USSR’
‘Playing Hide And Seek In Yugoslavia’
Then read the article, ‘The Marxist Co-Option Of History And The Use Of The Scissors Strategy To Manipulate History Towards The Goal Of Marxist Liberation’
Solution
The West will form new political parties where candidates are vetted for Marxist ideology/blackmail, the use of the polygraph to be an important tool for such vetting. Then the West can finally liberate the globe of vanguard Communism.
My blog…
https://djdnotice.blogspot.com/2018/09/d-notice-articles-article-55-7418.html
Imagine criminal forensic science requiring only similarities for fingerprint identification! Yeah, just as with the false positive laden PCR test, 100% of the nation would be guilty of a crime every time a fingerprint check was run! Or how about forensic DNA matching requiring only similarities! Imagine running a forensic ballistic test and only looking for similarities in bullet striations! Now one can fully appreciate the fraud behind the PCR non-test.
Reply
Dean Michael Jackson
| #
Paragraph added to:
Without the green fluorescent dye, the PCR non-test is incapable of even ‘seeing’/detecting the billions of nucleotide sequences created, let alone ‘see’/detect a particular target nucleotide sequence to determine if similarities exist between the target nucleotide sequence and the databank nucleotide sequences. If the green fluorescent dye is removed from the PCR non-test, the result of the non-test will show 0% positivity 100% of the time!
Reply
THOMAS W. ADAMS
| #
For no obvious, agreed reason, the World’s populations are being subjected to extreme “Control” measures; they are being told where they can and cannot be, at all times; and are threatened with hefty financial fines and penalties, reinforced with unprecedented warnings, threats and dire consequences. This is Martial Law, in disguise; Populations are being frightened into meek and non resistent compliance, or else! This virus, so called, is being used as a rehearsal, for some massive, and unpopular, engineered, structural changes, in the “Pipeline now”, ready to be proclaimed in the very near future; these changes will be unpopular, other wise, why would a rehearsal of this stringency for population containment be neccessary? The threat of this so called COVID19 VIRUS, is a complete fraud. We should all be asking; why has our democratic Government allowed itself to be so clandestinely complicit in such actions against it’s own Peoples? Why were we not consulted? Why was such devastating ruin, disruption, pain and disaster, allowed to paralyse the lives of all of us so less able to survive it? Amen It Is Written.
Reply
Joel Walbert
| #
Who cares about causality? No proof of existence of the virus according to a CDC document from a couple months back. Also admitted in same that the tests are calibrated from generic corona virus they had on hand. Dont believe me? Do some homework. It exists on page 39 on document ‘cdc-006-00019 rev 5’ from july 13 of this year. On the CDCs website
Reply
Deirdre
| #
Is this the same Blood test that BORIS (UK) thinks is necessary to pay £100 BILLION to purchase same? s
I cannot refer to him as a Prime Minister. I am not a UK resident.
Reply