New Study: Earth Was Typically Warmer Than Today

Archaeologists have published a new paper in New Scientist that confirms what previous research has shown: numerous periods during recent history have been as warm as or warmer than the present.

The paper, “Climate change has revealed a huge haul of ancient arrows in Norway,” discusses the findings of researchers from the Universities of Cambridge, Oslo, and Bergen.

The researchers discovered a “treasure trove” of arrows, arrowheads, clothing, and other artifacts, recently uncovered by receding ice in a mountainous region of southern Norway.

The oldest arrows and artifacts date from around 4100 BC. The youngest artifacts date from approximately AD 1300, at the end of the Medieval Warm Period.

Because present temperatures are only now exposing some of the artifacts were deposited when no ice covered the ground, temperatures were clearly warmer during the many periods when artifacts were deposited.

Along with the arrows and other artifacts, the researchers found nearly 300 specimens of reindeer antler and bone exposed by receding ice.

Because reindeer presently frequent the area, the archaeologists say they are confident the area has served as an important hunting ground, off and on, for millennia.

The fact that artifacts were found from several different periods separated by hundreds and thousands of years in time indicates the ice and snow in the region has expanded and receded several times over the current interglacial period.

Elsewhere in Norway, scientists also recently uncovered what they have labeled a “Viking highway,” a route the ancient peoples inhabiting the region used to travel regularly.

The route had for approximately 2,000 years been covered by snow and ice that expanded as the region’s climate shifted from a relatively warm period, comparable to present temperatures, to a colder period during which “permanent” thick snow and ice cover formed.

This erected the equivalent of a “highway closed” sign.

More evidence for relative warm periods in recent history has recently been found half a world away in frozen Antarctica, where scientists report they have discovered perfectly preserved, 800-year-old penguin remains exposed by a patch of melting ice along the Antarctic coast.

In an article published in the peer-reviewed journal Geology, scientists reported discovering what appeared to be the fresh remains of Adelie penguins in a region currently uninhabitable by penguins.

Carbon dating showed the penguin remains were approximately 800 years old, implying the remains had only recently been exposed by thawing ice.

Further analysis of the site showed penguins colonized and abandoned the site multiple times between 800 and 5,000 years ago.

Penguins are currently unable to inhabit the area where the frozen corpse was found because “fast ice” (ice that extends from the Antarctic shore many miles out into the ocean) prevents them from accessing the ocean for food.

During the Medieval Warm Period, the absence of fast ice allowed penguins to colonize and nest in the area for hundreds of years.

Numerous other frozen and near-perfectly preserved human and animal corpses have been discovered in the Arctic and glacial alpine regions in recent decades as the Earth has modestly warmed.

The most famous of these, perhaps, is the frozen human mummy scientists call Otzi, which hikers discovered in 1991 in a then-recently thawed area of the northern Italian Alps.

Analysis of the mummy’s clothing, body, stomach contents, and the plants found frozen around it indicate Otzi died, was nearly flash-frozen in place, and then covered over by ice- and snow-driven glacial expansion more than 5,300 years ago.

This fact suggests the Earth was just as warm, and the snow and ice extent just as low, 5,300 years ago as it is today.

Also, in the December 3, 2019, edition of Geophysical Research Letters, scientists examining materials from three lakes on the Svalbard archipelago jutting into the Arctic Ocean found evidence that from 11,700 through 8,200 years BPtemperatures in the region often exceeded both currently recorded temperatures and those projected by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to occur even under its worst-case scenarios.

Such ancient warmth existed for hundreds of years at a time.

According to the Svalbard evidence, peak warmth occurred approximately 10,000 years before the present, at which time temperatures in the region were estimated to be 7 degrees Celsius warmer than today.

Proxy data from tree rings, shell middens, and pollen trapped in peat, fossilized remains, and oral and written historical records all show not only that global temperatures have been as warm as or warmer than today, but also that all of these warm periods have been a boon for life, including the expansion of human communities.

Indeed, history shows these warmer periods contributed to the rise of agricultural societies, human civilizations with large permanent settlements (which have recently morphed into megalopolises), and modern nation-states.

Read more at Climate Realism

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method

 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (3)

  • Avatar

    Christian Loosli

    |

    Hi, very interesting. Dr. Zillmer suggested that Ôtzi was first dryed in the sun and much later covered with ice. He seems to be more like en egyptien mummy than a frozen one like mammuts.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Jerry Krause

    |

    Hi PSI Readers,

    I like to learn whom is the author of what I am reading. I like to know what a person has done and is doing to earn a living. I am old and retired, so I no longer need to earn a living because I have done that. But if you Google Dr. Jerry L. Krause science, you will first find a PSI posting with the title: ‘Dr Jerry L Krause: How Stupid Am I?’.

    I regularly try to inform PSI readers that SCIENCE can never prove any scientific idea (explanation) to be true. So that anyone writes, or speaks, as if there is a scientific truth, one knows that this person is not an actual scientist.

    So this is what Kevin Grandia wrote in his posting about Sterling Burnett.
    “Now I’m not a scientist and neither is Burnett, but all of this commonsense information about climate versus weather and global temperatures leads me to believe that gasp maybe Burnett is not the “leading authority” he claims himself to be. Nothing new here, sorry everyone, but regardless of what Burnett wants us to think, global warming is happening, human activity is to blame and the best science is telling us that the consequences will be dire.” as he wrote “global warming is happening, human activity is to blame and the best science is telling us that the consequences will be dire.”

    As I read what Sterling wrote I can only find he is reporting information about what has been observed. So Sterling whose academic degrees are in philosophy, merely cites evidence that has been observed which points to evidence that there is observed evidence temperatures at various locations were probably warmer than they are observed to be now. Which doesn’t prove he is a scientist but certainly does not prove he is not a scientist as Kevin’s writings prove he is not a scientist as honestly admits. So please apply this ‘litmus test’ to the writings of whomever writes about scientific topics.

    Have a good day, Jerry

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Nick Schroeder

    |

    Pull on your sciencey hip waders, enter only if you are truly curious.
    It is my contention that up/down welling, trapped/”back” radiated GHG looping power flux, W/m^2, is allegedly “measured” because the users don’t understand that pyrgeometers use thermocouples/thermopiles to measure temperatures and do not measure power flux directly.
    Power flux is inferred by applying the S-B equation to those measured temperatures and ASSUMING BB or 1.0 emissivity.
    As I demonstrated in my experiments this assumption about radiation and BB is incorrect.
    Because of the contiguous participating media, i.e. atmospheric molecules contributing non-radiative heat transfer, radiation does not function independently but in concert with the non-radiative processes and as such CANNOT function as a BB surface with 1.0 emissivity.
    Attached is an annotated Power Point slide that confirms these points.

    https://www.linkedin.com/posts/nicholas-schroeder-55934820_greenhouseeffect-greenhousegases-ghgs-activity-6744030959290736640-RXQM

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via