New clues suggest humans reached Mexico around 30,000 BC

Humans may have inhabited what’s now southern Mexico surprisingly early, between 33,448 and 28,279 years ago, researchers say.

If so, those people arrived more than 10,000 years before folks often tagged as the first Americans. Other preliminary evidence puts humans in central Mexico as early as around 33,000 years ago.

The latest evidence comes from animal bones that biological anthropologist and archaeologist Andrew Somerville and two Mexican colleagues found stored in a Mexico City lab. The bones had been excavated in the 1960s at a rock-shelter called Coxcatlan Cave.

Radiocarbon analyses of six rabbit bones from the site’s deepest sediment yielded unexpectedly old ages, the researchers report online May 19 in Latin American Antiquity. That sediment also contained chipped and sharp-edged stones regarded as tools by the site’s lead excavator.

Higher sediment layers yielded clearer examples of stone tools and other remnants of human activity dating to nearly 9,900 years ago. Somerville, of Iowa State University in Ames, initially suspected that rabbit bones from the deepest sediment were perhaps around 12,000 years old.

But analyses revealed they were much older, hinting humans were living in the cave roughly 30,000 years ago.

Somerville will next determine whether other animal bones from the ancient sediment display butchery marks, breaks where marrow was removed or burned patches from cooking. He also wants to locate and study possible stone tools from that same sediment that may be stored in the same lab.

Based on additional radiocarbon dates and comparisons with stone-tool finds from other Mexican sites, Somerville suspects that a separate occupation of Coxcatlan Cave occurred between 13,500 and 9,900 years ago.

Regional food and water sources may have dwindled when the last Ice Age peaked between 26,000 and 19,000 years ago, causing the earliest settlers to leave and delaying further occupations until conditions improved, Somerville speculates.

See more here: sciencenews.org

Header image: Andrew D. Somerville

PSI editor’s note: other excavations at Pedra Furada in Brazil, Cactus Hill in Virginia, and Buttermilk Creek in Texas have produced radio carbon dates of between 40 and 60,000 years ago. The so-called ‘Clovis Horizon’ of 13,000 years is way too short a time to colonise both North and South America.

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (7)

  • Avatar

    Joseph Olson

    |

    Clovis flint arrowheads, discovered across a wide range of North America used European style flaking and have been dated to 20,000 YBP. At the time, 600 pound saber-tooth tigers and packs of 400 pound dire wolves roamed the land. All went extinct 12,000 YBP when a giant meteorite smashed into the Canadian ice shield.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Jerry Krause

    |

    Hi PSI Readers,

    Do not believe any researcher who believes he/she precisely the beginning and ending years of anything more than say 6000 years ago. I do not know any person so foolish as to predict the year that some ancient people dug 56 regularly spaced (about 16 ft apart) holes in an approximate circular pattern at Stonehenge UK.

    Have a good day, Jerry

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Andy

      |

      Hi Jerry, as I understand it, carbon dating is accurate up to around 50,000 years old, after that, reliability drops off.

      Reply

      • Avatar

        Arron

        |

        How do they know their numbers are accurate?
        Nothing to judge against except more theory

        Reply

      • Avatar

        Burns Matkin

        |

        Andy: Carbon dating can go back as far as 50K years ago only because that is the half life that is measurable. It is an inaccurate guide to dates because you need a dated piece of carbon to match the test results. For example, wheat in a pharaoh’s tomb can be dated both by radioactive C dating and by normal history dating. Therefore, other carbon that has the same values can be dated to approximately that same time period.
        However, there is no matching historical data for mammoths, dire wolves, people or anything else past about 5-6000 BC . So the Carbon 14 tests can only give vague approximations of dates. It is possible that the range could be very great indeed.
        Even though C-14 degrades at the same rate, the base line levels must be known.

        Reply

        • Avatar

          Andy

          |

          The people who use C14 dating would obviously disagree with you.

          Reply

      • Avatar

        Jerry Krause

        |

        Hi Andy,

        “The people who use C14 dating would obviously disagree with you.”

        So you believe in CONSENSUAL SCIENCE???

        Have a good day, Jerry

        Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via