Nanoplastics and other harmful pollutants found in face masks

Image: Swansea University

Swansea University scientists have uncovered potentially dangerous chemical pollutants that are released from disposable face masks when submerged in water.

The research reveals high levels of pollutants, including lead, antimony, and copper, within the silicon-based and plastic fibres of common disposable face masks.

The work is supported by the Institute for Innovative Materials, Processing and Numerical Technologies (IMPACT) and the SPECIFIC Innovation & Knowledge Centre.

Project lead Dr Sarper Sarp of Swansea University College of Engineering said:

All of us need to keep wearing masks as they are essential in ending the pandemic. But we also urgently need more research and regulation on mask production, so we can reduce any risks to the environment and human health”.

Outlined in a recent paper, the tests carried out by the research team used a variety of masks – from standard plain face masks to novelty and festive masks for children with many currently being sold in UK retail outlets.

The rise in single-use masks, and the associated waste, due to the COVID-19 pandemic has been documented as a new cause of pollution. The study aimed to explore this direct link – with investigations to identify the level of toxic substances present.

The findings reveal significant levels of pollutants in all the masks tested – with micro/nano particles and heavy metals released into the water during all tests. Researchers conclude this will have a substantial environmental impact and, in addition, raise the question of the potential damage to public health – warning that repeated exposure could be hazardous as the substances found have known links to cell death, genotoxicity and cancer formation.

To combat this, the team advise further research and subsequent regulations be put in place in the manufacturing and testing process.

Dr Sarper Sarp continued:

The production of disposable plastic face masks (DPFs) in China alone has reached approximately 200 million a day, in a global effort to tackle the spread of the new SARS-CoV-2 virus. However, improper and unregulated disposal of these DPFs is a plastic pollution problem we are already facing and will only continue to intensify.

There is a concerning amount of evidence that suggests that DPFs waste can potentially have a substantial environmental impact by releasing pollutants simply by exposing them to water. Many of the toxic pollutants found in our research have bio-accumulative properties when released into the environment and our findings show that DPFs could be one of the main sources of these environmental contaminants during and after the Covid-19 pandemic.

It is, therefore, imperative that stricter regulations need to be enforced during manufacturing and disposal/recycling of DPFs to minimise the environmental impact.

There is also a need to understand the impact of such particle leaching on public health. One of the main concerns with these particles is that they were easily detached from face masks and leached into the water with no agitation, which suggests that these particles are mechanically unstable and readily available to be detached.

Therefore, a full investigation is necessary to determine the quantities and potential impacts of these particles leaching into the environment, and the levels being inhaled by users during normal breathing. This is a significant concern, especially for health care professionals, key workers, and children who are required to wear masks for large proportions of the working or school day.

The research team includes Professor Trystan Watson, Dr Javier Delgado Gallardo and Dr Geraint Sullivan.

The IMPACT operation is part-funded by the European Regional Development Fund through the Welsh Government and Swansea University.

See more here: swansea.ac.uk

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (7)

  • Avatar

    Manjushri

    |

    It’s not only the standard blue masks where caution is advised, this video looks at test kit swabs under the microscope. Scary stuff, watch it before Youtube ban it:
    https://youtu.be/2nAOCb5fh1Q

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Wisenox

      |

      Fibers shouldn’t twitch. That was the third video I’ve seen with odd fiber behavior. Thanks.

      Reply

  • Avatar

    Wisenox

    |

    The clear strands remind me of a Morgellons video. In the video, residents showed clear fibers floating in the night air. They would show in the light like bugs do. The interesting part of the story was that the fibers would then react with a dye in the body to colorize the fibers into what we see as Morgellons.
    This is similar to how Luciferase reacts with Luciferrin to produce luminescence. It would be interesting to see if the mask fibers respond in the same way.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Charles Higley

    |

    When you present a thesis and defend it, it behooves the researcher to investigate all aspects of their thesis.

    ““All of us need to keep wearing masks as they are essential in ending the pandemic.” – Dr. Sarp

    The doctor is an idiot (oblivious of what is going on around him), as he has clearly not studied the many studies on masks. There are now 60-some studies that either show that masks are ineffective against an infectious virus or that they are useless and ALSO cause health and mental problems. The only study supporting masks was one relatively recently by the CDC showing that masks work on a mannikin, a truly biased study from the start (talk about conflict of interest).

    He is assuming masks are critically important, they are not, and that there is a pandemic, there is not. There has been two flu seasons, actually rather mild ones, that they call the pandemic, but with a public that is more interested in supporting transsexual rights in sports than their health, gas-lighting the public has been very effective.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      RegretLeft

      |

      Well stated – there is SUCH disconnect between the “there is a pandemic” – and the “there is not” crowd 95% vs 5% roughly. How do you even begin to talk to the “is a pandemic” crowd … what kind of double-think is going on with this guy?! – “essential to wear masks” but “they are harming us” – where do you even start addressing that sort of “thinking”.
      I think the CDC study you reference was the one where they blew smoke at a mannikin wearing two masks and “found” that two masks were indeed more effective. So, now, do you “accept science”?

      Reply

  • Avatar

    Allan Shelton

    |

    The politicos are not going to listen to logic or change their mind by reading facts.
    “You can lead liberal to facts, but you can’t make them think.”

    Reply

  • Avatar

    aaron

    |

    you are so witty!
    but it has nothing to do with liberals, was it not trump who kicked the whole show off with by declaring a national emergency?

    Was it not trump who came up with warp speed?

    was it not trump who generously gave gates millions in funding?
    so are you implying trump is a liberal?
    take that diversionary garbage out of here and stop the pointless finger pointing,

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via