Miraculous Recovery of Hypoxemic Covid Patients with Ivermectin
The past three years have generated millions of case vignettes of patients with COVID-19 respiratory illness.
The most dramatic cases include critically ill inpatients with severe hypoxemia despite maximum respiratory support.
By far, the most notable cases of survival have occurred with the administration of ivermectin.
Former NIH researcher David Scheim, PhD, early in the pandemic proposed that SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein was acting like a grappling hook pulling together circulating red blood cells into long chains and clumps in a process called hemagglutination.
This explained why the red blood cells could not carry oxygen normally and was congruent with the finding of micro blood clots in the lungs.
Recently, Boschi et al have provided additional support for this mechanism.[i] In a spectacular publication, Stone et al, describes the prompt improvement of oxygenation in patients with ivermectin.[ii]
The published oxygenation curves from multiple studies clearly show this physiological effect of ivermectin occurs so rapidly, it must be explained by a direct anti-Spike protein effect of ivermectin.
An anonymous video of a critically ill man demonstrates the very effect that Scheim, Stone, Hazan, and Babalola have described in the Figure.[iii]
So for the next critically ill patient with COVID-19, if the opportunity presents itself, push for the administration of ivermectin.
This is the only published therapy for COVID-19 that improves oxygen saturation while the patient mounts a recovery.
As in this man, it may be the critical factor for a turnaround and a chance to walk out of the hospital.
References
[i] SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Induces Hemagglutination: Implications for COVID-19 Morbidities and Therapeutics and for Vaccine Adverse Effects Celine Boschi, David E. Scheim, Audrey Bancod, Muriel Millitello, Marion Le Bideau, Philippe Colson, Jacques Fantini, Bernard La Scola bioRxiv 2022.11.24.517882; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.24.517882
[ii] Stone, J.C.; Ndarukwa, P.; Scheim, D.E.; Dancis, B.M.; Dancis, J.; Gill, M.G.; Aldous, C. Changes in SpO2 on Room Air for 34 Severe COVID-19 Patients after Ivermectin-Based Combination Treatment: 62% Normalization within 24 Hours. Biologics 2022, 2, 196-210. https://doi.org/10.3390/biologics2030015
[iii] This well constructed case demonstrates recovery from COVID-19 respiratory illness and advanced hypoxemia with inpatient ivermectin.
See more here substack.com
Header image: The Conversation
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Saeed Qureshi
| #
Please, do not diagnose anything as COVID-19. COVID-19 does not exist. There is no evidence of spike protein either. (https://bioanalyticx.com/ivermectin-and-covid-19-controversy-why/)
Reply
John Thomas Bakkila
| #
Something exists. I’ve suffered, and am still suffering from Anosmia. Also. Some sort of illness swept through the region in which I live MONTHS before “covid- 19” was ever even reported.
Therefore, I think it’s safe to assume that the entire planet was infected (again, with something) LONG before anything…ANYTHING…was reported.
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
@ “Something exists.” Could be. But labeling it COVID-19 will put you on the wrong path that would deny a proper treatment and possibly prolong and aggravate the “illness.”
Reply
Typhus
| #
Look to the skies being universally bombarded by we can only guess.
But the nano Aluminum & Barium will do a Job on human health.
Reply
VOWG
| #
Based on those studies ivermectin could be used to cleanse the spike protein from those who took the clot shots.
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
@ “Based on those studies,” There are no studies with spike proteins. To conduct a study, one requires a specimen of the “spike protein” that is unavailable. So please remember that using the word” studies” is incorrect. These so-called studies are views are based on imagination/fiction.
COVID-19 is the wrong diagnosis. Ivermectin is working for something else – some “regular” infection.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Saeed and other PSI Readers,
Saeed: You just wrote: ““Something exists.” Could be. But labeling it COVID-19 will put you on the wrong path that would deny a proper treatment and possibly prolong and aggravate the “illness.”.” And you wrote: “Ivermectin is working for something else – some “regular” infection.”
Hence, you are admitting that a treatment for whatever ILLNESS being experienced by many is working. Which contradicts your claim that miss-labeling it COVID-19 will put you on the wrong path that would deny a proper treatment and possibly prolong and aggravate the “illness.”.”
You seem to be like the US medical community which has denied the IVERMECTIN treatment to ill people on arguments much like yours as they and you stubbornly seem to ignore that a safe treatment for “whatever” illness exists. Use your energy and time to convince the US medical community that they are wrong about the safe treatment which has been discovered to treat “whatever’ illness that actually did exist. Do you know that the vaccines have not caused a new illness that involve spike proteins etc.?
Have a good day, Jerry
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
Jerry:
You are reading my comment completely wrong.
I am not against the use of ivermectin and even HCQ. In fact, I support them at the discretion of the physicians.
However, labeling the illness as COVID-19 would, by default, disqualify such treatment. This is what CDC/experts have been doing for the past three years. In addition, COVID-19 is considered a virus-based infection, which would require a vaccine (to treat the virus). Again, this is what CDC/experts have been suggesting. This would mean the so-called illness has been put on the wrong path because there is no virus, and there cannot be COVID-19.
I hope this will help clarify my comment.
Reply
Typhus
| #
Please You are Too kind!
The CDC suggests nothing.
They Demand…
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Saeed,
Hi Saeed,
While I do not remember names very well, I do member the details of what I have read pretty well. And I remember that the man, whom to my memory, tried ivermectin to successfully treat a dying woman in NY state, did so because it was inexpensive, had long been used to successfully treat humans for something (?) without any observed harmful side effects and maybe most importantly there was published research evidence that it was an antiviral agent. And I know I treated and “cured” my plantar wart on the ball of my foot with onion ‘juice’. And I have read that warts are caused by a virus and I have been told that the onion has antiviral properties. So I believe you are confused, as are other health experts, that the only way one can treat a viral flu (infection) is with a vaccine. You seem to believe what these other experts believe.
Have a good day, Jerry
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
Jerry:
It was assumed that things were based on a virus in the past. However, because of the COVID-19 story (note story, not real), an intense debate started, which led to the discovery that there is no such thing as a virus.
It would not be inaccurate to say that I am the one who made this claim in the very beginning, based on scientific evidence (or lack of it), that virus does not exist. My claim was based on considering analytical chemistry (fundamental science) evaluating PCR testing – the backbone of viruses and virology. From a testing perspective, one can not have a valid test until one has a reference of the item the test is supposed to measure, in our case, the virus.
I could not find the reference virus anywhere. Therefore, all virus tests and claims become scientifically invalid and irrelevant. This is because no one has a specimen of the virus. – period. Now, others have supported this claim as well, but mostly at the observation level.
So, one thing is obvious now (thanks to the pandemic, it made it abundantly clear) no such thing as a virus exists.
So, when you say, “And I have read that warts are caused by a virus and I have been told that the onion has antiviral properties.” It is an old story based on the assumption there is something called a virus. However, as I stated above, such a view is invalid.
Any claim that something works against a virus, including vaccines, is also scientifically invalid.
So next time, if you like to discuss the virus or COVID-19, I would like to see the basis of your view, such as a publication that clearly shows the isolation/extraction of the virus from a human subject. Otherwise, discussing whether you read or think of something is not best. I am sorry, I do not mean to be impolite, but this discussion does seem to be adding any value.
Best regards
Typhus
| #
The Influenza & Common Colds.
Reply