Medical Science is Corrupted
Researchers who challenge dominant medical narratives may struggle to secure funding or publish their work, even when their research is unrelated to COVID-19, immunologist Robert Clancy told John Campbell.
Clancy’s new book, “COVID and the Corruption of Medical Science: A Quadrant Chronicle,” examines what he sees as the pandemic response’s lasting damage to scientific independence — and how it threatens patient care.
Clancy, an Australian medical researcher, author of more than 300 peer-reviewed papers, and University of Newcastle emeritus professor, said the pressure extends beyond COVID-19 studies. Medical journals sometimes reject work unrelated to COVID-19 if the researchers have a history of challenging the mainstream pandemic narrative.
“It’s not just that they’re blacklisting articles related to COVID. They’re blacklisting people who [were] foolish enough to write on these topics,” he said.
Clancy’s new book, “COVID and the Corruption of Medical Science: A Quadrant Chronicle,” examines what he sees as the pandemic response’s lasting damage to scientific independence.
For Clancy, the consequences extend beyond flawed pandemic policies to the future of medicine itself. He said the pandemic exposed a collapse of medical leadership and the growing influence of pharmaceutical companies.
“I think what COVID did is it made very clear the disintegration of leadership within medicine and the politicization and the substitution by aggressive big pharmaceutical companies, where the dollar is king,” he said.
source childrenshealthdefense.org
Tom
| #
Science in most realms is captured and no longer relevant as it is now dictated rather than discovered and experimentally tested. It can no longer be trusted. When you hear or see the words “trust the science”, run for the hills as it is a lie.
Reply
Charles Higley
| #
Science Corrupted
Ah, I am afraid you are right.
Even Physics has been subverted by illogical thinking. The whole dark matter/dark energy, etc. concepts(Dark Physics), is based on assumptions that conflict with our observations. Blackholes do not exist (Einstein, Oppenheimer, and NASA all agree here). The centers of galaxies are not giant blackholes, but large electrical nexi that spit out quasars which develop into protogalaxies and later galaxies.
The Big Bang, which appeals to religion, never happened—we and Earth are a part of supernova remnants of a star (the Sun) in a Steady State Electric Universe. The expanding universe is based on red shift observations, ignoring that passing through gravitational wells around galaxies and stars also causes red shifts and quasars are demonstrably located near the galaxies that produced them.
Electromagnetism is a billion, billion, billion, billion (10^36) times stronger than gravity and they claim gravity runs the universe? Actually, gravity might just be a residual effect from large amounts of London Dispersion forces (van den Waals forces), as you cannot have matter without the inherent presence of quarks with their up and down (positive and negative) charges—more matter means more quarks.
The concept of a multiverse of universes is just fantastical thinking, based on the mistake of taking physical equations to the extremes of the variables. Infinity does not exist as nature has limits, but apparently physicists to not have limits—it is good to have an open mind but not so open that your brain falls out. String Theory is another field in which nothing has been or can be proven, yet physicists hypothesize many dimensions and their reality, which is just more fantastical thinking. More funding, please, is the mantra.
Geology is subject to the vagaries of Continental Drift Theory which is wrong, as there is no subduction and seemingly drifting tectonic plates are all pulling away from each other (NASA) as the planet expands. The oldest sea floor is only 250 million years old, which marks when the planet-covering lithosphere (called is a whole planet Pangea) began to fracture due to expansion. Earth’s core is the remnant of an unsymmetrical supernova event and rich in neutron-rich elements as a result.
The Sun is also not a hydrogen fusion engine but is a remnant as well. We have known for many decades that the neutrino flux from the Sun is wrong for a fusion engine (we have been lied to). Sunspots are interesting as they are dark (black) inside—they should be brighter than Sun’s surface for fusion to be there. Instead, sunspots are dark and cool inside (NASA has reported clouds in some), indicating that the hot surface is not due to the interior. The hot surface and the one-million-mile-away solar atmosphere at one million deg C cannot be from the surface.
What can heat this to a million degrees? Electricity, due to Birkland currents from one or more nearby stars. Stars pick up static charges passing through interstellar space just as helicopter and dirigibles pick up charge going through our atmosphere. And, with high enough charge differences, currents can flow. Our current 12 million-year Ice Age (2 million years into it) is caused by the proximity to other stars and their erratic Resistor-Capacitor (R/C circuit) behavior. Glacial periods (~90,000 years) are low or no current times while charging occurs and Interglacials (~10–12,000 years) are times of discharge between a star and the Sun. Our warm periods and cold periods in the current Interglacial are shorter-term oscillations that closely mimic the almost rhythmic current oscillations of a lab R/C circuit. We just do not know when the current will stop and we go glacial again.
As these neutron-rich elements in Earth’s core and the Sun breakdown due to neutron repulsion, lighter elements, mainly carbon and hydrogen, with the resulting daughter elements taking up more space than the parent. They percolate up through the mantle, expanding the planet’s volume, and eventually forming methane and higher carbon-based compounds, as gas, oil, and coal (the latter being plant matter subjected under pressure and heat to gas and oil).
The expanding plant also explains why we find gas and/or oil anywhere we drill deep enough and why we see similar expansion on other planets and moons. There is no subduction. Mountain ranges are not just whims of nature or from subduction. They are crunched up lithosphere caused by flattening of continental pieces on the surface of the expanding, flatter planet—something has to relieve the downward stress of the stiff material, thus crunching occurs. There is no subduction that results in mountain ranges.
And biology has suffered from the basic rejection of basic evolution, a denial of Darwin (Darwin had nothing to do with the origin of life, just how it develops after that. We now know that using rodents as proxies for humans is fraught with problems as tha=ey are so distantly related to us and have vastly different biochemistries and physiologies. I heard the other day the claim that plants think and feel pain such that the wood is still screaming even after being made into toothpick—an appeal to empathy. And the claim that eating meet is simply part of anumals’ graveyard.
What these idiots (those who do not know what is going on around them) do not realize is that domestic animals are the winners. They will never go extinct, as they are fostered and healthy until they are old enough, enjoying mostly good conditions (there is the odd, nasty farmer here and there), and they will go to other planets with us. They have won the Golden Ticket and have ensured survival of their species “to the universe and beyond,” (Buzz Lightyear).
Medicine has suffered greatly since Rockefeller ran a campaign against natural and cheap cures that had accumulated over time. Many cannot be patented and thus unprofitable. He replaced them with pharmaceuticals that are relatively very expensive. Medicines are supposedly designed to fight conditions and diseases (bacteria and viruses). The side effects of many medicines are often many and even life threatening, but we are told we need them to survive (in health?).
The fields of bacteriology and virology were created as the excuse for designing medicines. Bacteria are only a problem for unhealthy tissues (in us) and viruses only supposedly produced by starving cell cultures to the point of cell death and breakdown resulting in virus(-like) particles. To this point, no human virus has ever been isolated, purified, and shown to cause disease. Wow. This is all Germ Theory. In this area, they rarely look for environmental or systemic toxins—they always assume a disease-causing bacteria or virus. When everyone is looking only in one direction, one should wonder why they do not or refuse to look in the other direction.
The concept that works is Terrain Theory in which the body and its tissues are the terrain and they are healthy if properly nourished and maintained. This means having the right amounts of vitamins and minerals in our diet and proper life habits, such as exercise and thinking. I am remiss in not finding this earlier, but during the Plandemic, I noticed reports of Covid-19 victims having similar deficiencies, such as vitamin D and zinc deficiencies.
Recent work has shown that magnesium intake in much higher (harmless) doses than FDA recommended can relieve depression. And lithium (Li) deficiencies are the common thread to Alzheimers (Alz) development. Amyloid plaques appear to sequester Li in the brain and cause deficiencies. Alz can also occur without such plaques, in the presence of Li deficiency in the diet. They need to work out the minimum daily Li intake required to avoid Alz and needed to counter amyloid plaque Li uptake—however, you cannot patent Li, so there is no interest in using it for our good. They just want more funding to find complex (and dangerous) medicines that cannot and will ever be a cure.
This alternative theory, Terrain Theory, was supplanted by Germ Theory, which was easy for the public to accept as it specified specific enemies to be defeated. We now know that Louis Pasteur cheated in his research and the rabies vaccine was/is a basically dangerous hoax on the public. No vaccine has been a real vaccine and vaccines have even been shown to lead to disease when a vaccine is examined by real numbers and analysis.
Even economics has been largely dominated by Keynesian policies which determine that governments know what is best for economies. They always just screw it up as a free market that generates wealth HAS to be free. The advent of computer models and the economists’ worship of them has led to all kinds of bad policies and regulations.
Climate science, which is today based on unfounded assumptions, junk science, and altered data and perceptions, is subverted by political agendas and not based on the real world. This is why none of the climate warmist predictions have ever proven correct or true. They usually make their claims based on limited, cherry-picked data, and altered (dishonestly) data. They rely on the public “trusting the (junk) science” to further goals/agendas.
Where does it end? It does not end. We need to keep our eyes and ears and minds open and not be afraid to questions things that just seem wrong or erroneous. It is going to be hard to correct the course of so many aberrations from reality, but we have to learn to say “No, that is wrong and does not make sense.” The resulting temper tantrums need to be ignored. Climate claims are a good example as they blame/claim AGW is the cause no matter what the observations is. When in fact, we have no control or influence, except locally, on climate and it is a naturally chaotic system of over 50 factors, constantly changing conditions (such seasons and tides), and constantly changing land/sea proportions during the day-night cycle. There is no real global temperature, a joke on the public.
Reply
Herb Rose
| #
Hi Charles,
Physics ended after Galileo contention that beliefs most be based on reality and Newton claimed that it was based on mathematics. Since the ‘truth’ is controlled by those being paid to perpetuate this foolishness, it will not change and the stupidity will continue to become more and more ridiculous.
Herb.
Reply
Herb Rose
| #
Hi Charles,
It is energy, not the electric force, that forms the universe. There are the same amount of protons and electrons in the universe and yet it contains electric field of different strengths being radiated from objects. This is because the attraction of energy to positive mater is stronger than the attractive force between an electron and a proton, causing the break up of neutrons creating atoms. it is the separation of electric charges the create electric fields of different strengths even though the charges are equal.
Herb
Reply