James Webb Space Telescope hit by tiny meteoroid
A tiny rock fragment has hit the new James Webb Space Telescope’s main mirror.
The damage inflicted by the dust-sized micrometeoroid is producing a noticeable effect in the observatory’s data but is not expected to limit the mission’s overall performance.
James Webb was launched in December to succeed the revolutionary – but now ageing – Hubble Space Telescope.
Astronomers are due to release its first views of the cosmos on 12 July.
The US space agency Nasa said these images would be no less stunning because of what’s just happened.
The incident appears to have occurred sometime between 23 and 25 May.
Analysis indicates the mirror segment known as C3 – one of the 18 beryllium-gold tiles that make up Webb’s 6.5m-wide primary reflector – was struck. The contact left a “dimple” in the segment, Nasa told the Reuters news agency.
The speed at which things move through space means even the smallest particles can impart a lot of energy when colliding with another object. Webb has now been hit five times with this latest event being the most significant.
Webb has an open design; its mirrors are not guarded by the kind of tubular baffle seen on other space telescopes, such as Hubble. Instead, the reflectors sit behind one giant sunshield that allows them to maintain the stable, cold temperatures needed to detect infrared light.
The possibility of micrometeoroid hits was anticipated and contingencies were incorporated into the choice of materials, the construction of components and the different modes of operating the telescope.
“We always knew that Webb would have to weather the space environment, which includes harsh ultraviolet light and charged particles from the Sun, cosmic rays from exotic sources in the galaxy, and occasional strikes by micrometeoroids within our Solar System,” said Paul Geithner, technical deputy project manager at Nasa’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland.
“We designed and built Webb with performance margin – optical, thermal, electrical, mechanical – to ensure it can perform its ambitious science mission even after many years in space.”
Engineers will adjust the positioning of the affected mirror segment to cancel out a portion of the introduced distortion, but they can’t remove it all.
Webb is currently gathering observations of the Universe, near and far, to demonstrate its capabilities. Astronomers will present these pictures to the world next month.
Longer term, the scientists intend to use Webb to try to see the very first stars to light up the cosmos more that 13.5 billion years ago.
They’ll also train the telescope’s big “eye” on the atmospheres of distant planets to see if those worlds might be habitable.
See more here: bbc.co.uk
Header image: NASA
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Howdy
| #
How many pings does it need before the fragile thing is rendered useless? Damage is due to total lack of foresight. It’s been stated more than once that this type of thing will happen. You really think space travel will be at light speed and without incident?
Reply
BIll
| #
Epic waste of money. Even if by some chance any meaningful data is gathered by this, that we don’t already know, it still won’t solve a single problem here on Earth. Not a single one!
Just like going to the moon (maybe we did) didn’t solve a damn thing here. Just wasted more money and resources. But hey, maybe if we send a diverse group of people to mars it will solve world hunger and allow peace in our lifetimes? lol… it won’t.
Reply
RockyTSquirrel
| #
up to a point I must agree with you.
But consider the side benefits, those little things we learned while working on the bigger picture..
“Tang” (everybody likes Tang), Teflon, Velcro, High temperature ceramics, super duct tape, even that stuff they call food in a tube… and on and on…
and besides, I got some really cool, “patches” of all the different flights.. 😉
It may not seem like a good return on all the money thrown at the project, but really, how much would some of the “side benefits” really be worth.?.
. . .
(as requested, this is an opinion and or SARCASM)
“Let’s Go, Brandon” (F.J.B.)
Reply
T. C. Clark
| #
Looking forward to the pics in a few weeks….better be good ones.
Reply