Ivermectin – Miracle Drug Against COVID-19
It’s early December, 2020. I don’t know anything about Ivermectin. Then there’s a chance remark and an email in my inbox. It’s a miracle drug, I learn. The doctor I’m listening to, Pierre Kory, first presented to a US Senate Committee on May 7th.
He is presenting again on December 8th. He begs the senators to review the amazing data in the report. Take this drug and you will not get Covid. Guaranteed.
“I can’t keep doing this,” he pleads to the Senate Committee. People are dying, unable to breathe, and a remedy is known. His magic bullet: Ivermectin.
He cites a study of health care workers in Argentina. 400 were given Ivermectin plus carrageenan. Zero got Covid. On the other hand, 58% of the health care workers in the control group got Covid.
His presentation topped 5 million views in a few days.
I do research. So many studies. (Sources at the end.)
Numerous controlled and observational studies show that Ivermectin has strong anti-viral and anti-inflammatory effects. Even in very severe cases, mortality is cut by up to 90%. But if it’s started early, there is zero mortality, and there are no severe cases.
Due to these results, the US Front-Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) recommends Ivermectin for covid-19 prophylaxis and early treatment.
I’ll go on to: why hasn’t there been a rush to get Ivermectin to patients? Plus, what is the right dosage?
But first, you may be asking: what about HCQ? I’ve long known the amazing effectiveness of HCQ through, in the US, the efforts of Dr Zelenko and later a 600-doctor group, the FrontLine Doctors.
HCQ has basically the same effectiveness rate as Ivermectin for early-stage Covid.
It has slightly less effectiveness for late-stage Covid (about 3% less effectiveness).
So I’m all for HCQ.
But it’s banned in many countries, as well as in many American states.
It’s easier to turn to Ivermectin, than to combat the many government and health agencies that so very clearly do not have our well-being as a high priority.
Ivermectin is widely used with farm animals as an anti-parasitic. In most countries, it’s been available at feed stores. No prescription. This past year, restrictions have been growing as awareness of its effectiveness against Covid has been growing. In some Canadian provinces farmers now need to justify purchases, based on the number of farm animals they have. But it’s still available at the feed stores.
It’s also available online, without a prescription, on numerous sites.
The next question: Why hasn’t there been a rush to get Ivermectin to patients?
Instead all we hear blasted out by the mainstream media is “Wear a mask,” “Wash your hands,” and “Lockdown!”
So why has the mainstream media been ignoring this information, and why have social media platforms been censoring and removing the information? After all, there are findings from: Argentina Australia Bangladesh Bolivia Brazil Costa Rica Dominican Republic El Salvador Ethiopia Guatemala Hungary India Panama Peru Philippines. The message is clear: Ivermectin is amazingly effective as a preventative and cure.
Equally clear: most Western government figures, health officials and media controllers do not want us to have this information. As shown, our wellbeing is not a priority. Their priorities: lockdown, the destruction of many businesses, a rise in depression and suicide and addiction and child abuse and more.
We all know this, so I won’t belabor the point.
Of greater interest is the final question: what are the right dosages? I’m not a health care professional. So I’ll give the findings from NPS MedicineWise, established in Australia in 1998 as the National Prescribing Service (NPS) Limited. Through two decades of continuous national leadership and services provided in the health sector, NPS MedicineWise remains committed to supporting quality use of medicines to improve health decisions and health and economic outcomes in Australia. In other words, this is a highly credible source.
They present numerous studies. As expected, the general conclusion of observational studies of patients with COVID-19 treated with Ivermectin: it works brilliantly.
As for dosage, the study evaluating the effect of Ivermectin on the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19 found that:
the administration of 3 times the usual amount of the drug was most effective.
So the best dose is, according to their research: 0.6 milligrams per kilogram of weight.
This produces faster and deeper shedding of the virus when treatment is started early in the infection (up to 5 days of starting symptoms).
And how often should the dosage be taken?
For that I have an infographic (see below) from a manufacturer of Ivermectin.
Note that this treatment protocol states that Ivermectin is to replace HCQ (rather than that it is an alternative). This is to be expected from a company manufacturing Ivermectin.
Note also that the dosage recommended is the standard one, not the dosage 3 times higher that is recommended by NPS MedicineWise.
They give 3 scenarios:
- 2 doses for someone who has come close to someone with Covid: day one, and day 7;
-
ongoing for health care workers: day one, day 7, day 30, and ongoing every 30 days;
-
3 dosages for people with mild Covid: day one, day 2, day 3.
And that should be it. There should be Ivermectin – or HCQ – prescribed for all Covid patients exhibiting mild symptoms, meaning some shortness of breath.
That has not been happening. Instead there is pressure to vaccinate against the virus, though viruses are notorious for mutating, so no vaccine can long be effective.
Still the information on Ivermectin may be a game-changer for people. You’re not vulnerable to the fear-mongering if you have a remedy – or better yet, if you take Ivermectin as a preventative.
I see two main benefits from this information on Ivermectin. First and most important, it gives us power and control – the very opposite of what has been happening to us. We’re not at the mercy of a virus, or of a government that has cut us off from a known effective treatment. Second, it gives yet another piece of evidence that the government, health agencies and the media are not on our side – nor are most health care professionals who tend to follow the official messages.
All the best to us, to people, to humanity.
Excellent sources:
https://canadafreepress.com/article/a-miracle-drug-take-it-you-will-not-get-sars-cov-2
https://www.thecompleteguidetohealth.com/ivermectin.html
https://www.thecompleteguidetohealth.com/ivermectin-for-the-prevention-of-covid-19-so-who-is-telling-the-truth.html
https://dryburgh.com/ivermectin-pierre-kory/
https://www.theautochannel.com/news/2020/12/10/922677-senate-testimony-dr-pierre-kory-ivermectin-miracle-drug-to-treat.html
https://vaccineimpact.com/2020/i-cant-keep-watching-patients-die-needlessly-medical-professor-testifies-to-congress-that-covid-cure-already-exists-with-ivermectin/https://www.fox5ny.com/news/doctor-pleads-for-review-of-data-on-ivermectin-as-covid-19-treatment-during-senate-hearing
Should the first link to Dr Kory’s presentation to the December 8th US Senate Committee disappear, here is a second link.
Since the health care workers who did not get covid were prescribed iota carrageenan as well as Ivermectin, I also looked briefly into research on and availability of iota-carageenan. First, it’s readily available, for instance, in Betadine nasal spray, found in pharmacies. As for the research, it shows that iota carrageenan, in a nasal spray, combined with Xylitol, is effective in inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 in cell culture:
“Iota carrageenan forms a weaker, more elastic gel that is reasonably stable through refrigerated storage, freezing, and thawing.”
“The main objective of our study was to test the antiviral action of three candidate nasal spray formulations against SARS-CoV-2. We have found that iota-carrageenan in concentrations as low as 6 µg/ mL inhibits SARS-CoV-2 infection in Vero cell cultures. The concentrations found to be active in vitro against SARS-CoV-2 may be easily achieved by the application of nasal sprays already marketed in several countries. Xylitol at a concentration of 5 % m/V has proved to be virucidal on its own and the association with iota-carrageenan may be beneficial.”
Read more at truthsummit.info
About Dr Elsa Schieder: Elsa is a qualified psychologist on a mission of truth running her WorldTruthSummit.com website. Elsa is noted for her interviews with Islam experts Robert Spencer, Bill Warner, Citizen Warrior and others.
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Mark Tapley
| #
Ivermectin the latest miracle drug in 60 year old and billions of dollar “War On Cancer” Fraud can now cure the fake virus too. Now that the medical racket has announced that this stuff is not just for worming horses and cattle but also effective for the barnyard animals on the global Zionist plantations as well, expect restrictions on this crap and a big price increase.
Fauci and the other medical frauds at the CDC, after years of getting nowhere in their search for cancer cures saw the money roll in with the invention of the phony AIDS “epidemic” similar to the global warming scam. Now the long planned fake virus is being used to condition the goyim as they are all herded to agenda.
Reply
rickk
| #
Not for nothing…but how come we’ve not used this on our common colds or regular flus?
I’m not a doctor, but I play one on my keyboard.
Reply
4TimesAYear
| #
They’ve known about the anti-viral properties of some drugs since the 70’s. Remember them telling us that anti-biotics don’t work on viruses? Well, guess what the doc would prescribe for me whenever I’d get really sick (numerous times every year I got the flu vaccine)? Azithromycin. https://www.jpands.org/vol25no3/merritt.pdf How many people had to die to keep this information suppressed?
“For example, “numerous investigations have reported in vitro antiviral activity of AZ [azithromycin] against viral pathogens with 50% inhibitory concentrations ranging from ~ 1–6 μM, with the exception of H1N1 influenza,” write Damle et al.1They state that in vitro evidence suggests that AZ has antiviral properties at concentrations that are physiologically achievable with doses used to treat bacterial infections in the lung. Intracellular sequestration of AZ may prevent viral replication. AZ is being used against COVID-19, with the generally stated rationale being its antibacterial or antiinflammatory activity.Antibiotics used in Lyme disease, including tetracyclines, macrolides, metronidazole, and ciprofloxacin, may have activity against a number of viruses.2How could all our medical education “overlook” this basic science? It may be difficult for non-physicians to appreciate the magnitude of this world-shaking scientific omission—and probable cover-up. It is the pharmaceutical equivalent of being told for 40 years the world is flat—only to have it conclusively exposed overnight to be round. This idea that viruses—like the current pandemic SARS-CoV-2 virus—can be killed by commonly used drugs—antibiotics, antimalarial, or antiparasitic agents—profoundly changes the practice of medicine.”…
“…why was the research into CQ not pursued? Consider that the entire $69 billion-per-year vaccine industry is based on “preventing” viral diseases that are otherwise “untreatable”—like viral influenza A, measles, etc. If a cheap and effective treatment is available for these illnesses, the entire vaccine industry crashes down like a house of cards.”
Reply