Is there any weather condition that cannot be blamed on global warming?

Written by Ross Clark on January 3, 2023. Posted in Current News

It seems not, judging by the reaction in the US liberal press to the snowstorm that has engulfed much of the US over the past few days.

According to Bloomberg, it is all down to a loopier-than-normal jet stream, “the kind of event that could become more common as climate change accelerates.”

A similar claim was made by Eric Mack, a correspondent on Forbes, who wrote this week that the poles are warming disproportionately and that, “studies [he didn’t say which ones] have shown that all this unusual and rapid warming in the north affects the jet stream in new and sometimes weird ways.”

This week’s storm, he asserted, would soon come to be seen not as a once-in-a-generation event but as normal winter weather.

The New York Times has made a similar claim, as has Britain’s Guardian – the latter of which subtly reversed its recently acquired habit of using the term ‘global heating’ and went back to good old ‘climate change’ for the occasion, with Is global warming causing the temperature to plunge to minus 40 Celsius?

It is just that there is compelling evidence to the contrary.

For example, the IPCC’s sixth assessment report, published in 2021, cited a number of analyses showing that “cold spells have undergone a reduction in magnitude and intensity in all regions of North America.”

In other words, the reality is not counterintuitive at all. Generally, rising global temperatures have led to a lessening of cold extremes in North America; it is just that this week’s weather was an extreme, random event that occurred in spite of the general climatic trend.

As for the theory that AGW is causing disturbances in the jet stream – a powerful flow of air several miles up in the atmosphere that divides polar air from tropical air – or in the ‘polar vortex’ (a disturbance higher up, in the stratosphere), which was debunked by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) after the last blast of extreme cold weather to strike the central US in February 2021.

It is not easy to establish long-term trends in phenomena that have only been studied since the 1950s, NOAA pointed out, but even in that short time, the polar vortex has trended in entirely opposite directions.

During the early-to-mid 1990s, the polar vortex was very strong, which made for a non-loopy jet stream. Come the late 1990s, however, the polar vortex began to weaken again, giving us a more wandering jet stream.

Yet that trend has not been sustained, either.

If the polar vortex and jet stream really were being strongly influenced by rising global temperatures you would at least expect a trend to continue year after year as the global temperatures continued to increase.

In other words, this week’s weather in the US is just that: weather. But that will never do when you are trying to tell a morality tale about humans fouling their own nest through their own arrogance and stupidity: every adverse weather event must be blamed on it.

By the way, the last time the US Midwest saw such low temperatures in 1977, it was interpreted by some as a sign of a coming ice age.

I have a popular book of the time, Earthshock, written by a volcanologist from Imperial College and a geologist from Birkbeck College, claiming that a prolonged freeze like that of 1977 could be exactly what provoked a sudden dive into the next ice age.

Now it is apparently a sign that we are all about to fry.

There is a third possibility: that the US Midwest has a climate that is prone to occasional blasts of polar conditions. But that doesn’t sound nearly so exciting.

See more here climatechangedispatch

Editor’s note: not mentioned here is that the movement of the Jet Stream is caused by the Sun not the climate. In a solar maximum, the Jet Stream is fairly straight, but during a solar minimum, like the one we are coming out of, the Jet Stream does indeed go ‘loopy’, as shown in the illustration below.

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.