How To Tell If Blood Is From A Vaxxed Person
The only thing that comes to my mind is the detection of the gene product. Vaccinated individuals should carry a significant amount of the spike protein permanently.
This may be detected in this ELISA test specific for the spike protein IgG. https://www.coronavirus-diagnostik.de/antikoerpertestsysteme-fuer-covid-19.html .
Of course, this also includes the acutely ill persons – but they should not donate blood in this condition either.
The direct detection of the spike protein would be, funnily enough, the hypersensitive PCR. A “vaccinated” person should, in contrast to a diseased person, express the spike protein much longer, and without any symptoms.
The actual asymptomatic ill person a la Drosten 😊 . This would also be a distinguishing feature based on this PCR, which is highly praised for other purposes.
Quite exciting: Excluded from blood donation would definitely be spike protein PCR positive symptomless people who express the spike not due to infection but due to gene therapy – and this continuously over a period exceeding the normal pathogenesis (ca 5 days).
You might also throw a few “long-covid” people into the wrong potty, but it is better to be over-precise than to have a “vaccinated” person as a donor.
How can I be sure blood I receive is from an un-vaccinated person?
Nothing is certain except death. Admittedly, this is a bit sarcastic, but it has a point.
At the moment, modern scientific methods cannot tell the difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated blood one hundred percent.
This is also the biggest hurdle for us to be able to offer blood reserves – until we can provide this proof, a blood bank is illusory.
Fortunately, we have many scientists on our side (people like Prof. Bhakdi, Hockertz and many more) and they are working hard to get this done. For us, at the moment, dark field microscopy is the tool of choice, with which you can clearly see the difference – but this is not scientifically recognized.
So, in other words: in order to operate a blood bank, we still need scientific proof that is recognized by orthodox medicine. We will be able to provide this, but we still need time. The situation is somewhat different when it comes to the direct transfer of blood donors to recipients.
Here, I am confident that everyone who is a member and indicates “unvaccinated” in their profile, indeed is unvaccinated.
People who have experienced on their own body for two years what you have to put up with in order to somehow get through as an unvaccinated person, who have partially lost their livelihood and many friends, these people have ZERO interest in fooling us other members – they are simply telling the truth; otherwise they would be on the other side and vaccinated long ago.
That said, this is where something called trust comes into play. in the community of the unvaccinated, we trust each other. I personally trust everyone who makes himself directly available to me as an unvaccinated blood donor. It’s as clear as day to me.
Our entire system is completely anonymous until the moment when you have a flesh-and-blood person in front of you as a blood donor. Then you can look each other in the eye.
Be that as it may, a vaccinated person pretending to be an unvaccinated person (let’s call him a terrorist) can thwart the whole process in the production of blood – i.e. in this production we will have to include laboratory verification – quite clearly.
ONE terrorist can bring the whole system down. But in the direct blood donor to recipient match, a terrorist is only defrauding the one recipient and no one else.
This is, if you are a recipient, very unfortunate for you at this moment, but first of all we do everything we can to prevent this in advance, and secondly it means that the other 99.9 percent who do not fall for a fraudster still benefit from our organization – from you as an honest member.
I do this whole safeblood thing to help people. as many as possible. But if I could help even a single one, the effort was already worth it for me.
And what would be the alternative? To say “I can’t be sure” – and thus do nothing at all? OK, then you are guaranteed to get vaccinated blood.
Or you can consciously take a minimal residual risk and still be better off. You choose between a risk of probably less than one percent (as a member) or 100 percent (as a non-member) of getting vaccinated blood after all.
My choice is clear, and as a realistic optimist, I am not waiting for the ideal world, but doing my part to achieve the best possible solution at the moment.
See more here safeblood.ch
Header image: Thejournal.ie
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
VOWG
| #
The PCR test is useless.
Reply
Charles Higley
| #
“The direct detection of the spike protein would be, funnily enough, the hypersensitive PCR. A “vaccinated” person should, in contrast to a diseased person, express the spike protein much longer, and without any symptoms.”
No, PCR is only for nucleic acid sequence detection. It is indeed useless for proteins.
One should be using ELISA for protein detection. Antibodies can be developed against the weaponized “vaccine” spike protein, which can be isolated by PAGE electrophoresis and exchange columns, and can be very sensitive.
Reply
Charles Higley
| #
Any biochemist should know this.
Reply
chris
| #
the injected should carry the spike GENE, which most probably will never get degraded, that for sure can be detected with PCR, in particular since NO normally infected person EVER carries N1-Methylpseudouridine… A detection of JUST THAT SYNTHETIC nuclotide would be simple and enough to tell with whom you are dealing with.
Reference:
1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9376333/
2. https://mejbcart.substack.com/p/synthetic-modified-mrna-a-new-tomorrow
Reply
chris
| #
Professor Stefan Hockertz says at the very begin:
“The only thing that comes to my mind is the detection of the gene product.” thus when he talks about the SPike protein detection, I assume he means the GENE….
Reply
Big Crow
| #
actually, one donation can infect multiple recipients.
Reply
herb
| #
The WHO Confirms that the Covid-19 PCR Test is Flawed: Estimates of “Positive Cases” are Meaningless. The Lockdown Has No Scientific Basis
https://www.globalresearch.ca/nucleic-acid-testing-technologies-use-polymerase-chain-reaction-pcr-detection-sars-cov-2/5739959
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
They (WHO and CDC) declared the test flawed but have not removed its use because it will end the so-called pandemic and kill the cash cow and the “science authority cow” for some or many.
More importantly, it will end the virology and medical profession as we know it. Otherwise, it is very easy to end or remove everything leading to the pandemic https://bioanalyticx.com/virology-and-the-pcr-test/.
Reply
Alan
| #
We will have to arrange to donate our own blood and have it kept for operations if needed. I’m determined not to have any vaxxed blood in me.
Reply
Lorraine
| #
There’s no way to verify banked blood would be given if a transfusion is required.
How can one verify it is indeed your own blood or the blood of a known unvaxxed donor.
There was a recent case of an infant who was given blood from a blood bank rather than blood donated by someone the family knew. And the infant died of massive blood clots.
Reply
Frank S.
| #
There may be another technique to identify vaxxed blood. Seeing the ‘self-assembling’ circuitry which appears when subjected to EMF, then “melt” when the EMF source is turned off, seems to align with a vaxxed person generating their own unique IP address. Does donated vaxxed blood show up as an IP address? If so, does that function of the blood disappear over time (as if the circuitry melts)?
Reply
Howdy
| #
Unique IP address? Can’t see it at all. Tell me more Frank!
Reply
Frank S.
| #
https://www.ftwproject.com/orgonite-blog/the-bluetooth-challenge-explained-why-covid-vaxxed-people-are-emitting-bluetooth-codes-and-how-you-can-see-it-for-yourself/
https://www.ftwproject.com/orgonite-blog/the-bluetooth-challenge-explained-why-covid-vaxxed-people-are-emitting-bluetooth-codes-and-how-you-can-see-it-for-yourself/?unapproved=8904&moderation-hash=4956be57c08e4686610e47dd976a331f#comment-8904
Reply
herb
| #
Vaxxed Blood Shows ‘Stacking’, Typical of Blood Cancer
https://www.europereloaded.com/vaxxed-blood-shows-stacking-typical-of-blood-cancer/
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Herb,
While I sometimes strongly disagree with what you write, I must admit that yow make the effort to reference what you have actually read as you have just done. Good work!
Have a good day, Jerry
Reply
Typhus
| #
Reuleaux…?
Reply
Typhus
| #
Reuleaux formation is also typical in c19 Patented Bioweapon Injected Victims blood.
Reply
Typhus
| #
Regards the disintegration of nanite constructions.
Analysis shows that the source of signal blueprint instructions and power are cut off by a faraday cage.
However…the natural super conductor…graphing oxide is emitting a magnetic field & current flow in the body…which is electric with magnetic fields of its own. So the nanites are still powered..though without instructions.. They randomly then form chrystals.
Reply
Typhus
| #
I reckon that the chrystal formation is some kind of default poison pill… That kills when it’s nanites EMF instruction are cut off.
Reply