How is Nothing better than Random?
A viewer sent in a question with a concern over how “nothing” constitutes a better answer to existence than “randomness”?
Isn’t “nothing” just a parallel answer, similarly devoid of ontology, that doesn’t actually inform us of anything more than randomness didn’t?
What a great question!!!
See more here: climateofsophistry
Header image: Towards Data Science
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.