How ‘Fossil Fuels’ Doubled Human Life Expectancy
There is perhaps no more profound transformation in human history than what occurred in the past two centuries. After millennia of short, brutal lives—punctuated by famine, plague, and weather—something shifted
Suddenly, people began living longer, healthier, more comfortable lives.
Infant mortality dropped. Women didn’t die in childbirth at the same rates.
Food became more plentiful, clean water more reliable, heat more accessible, and medical care more effective.
That shift didn’t happen because we became more moral or spiritual or democratic. It wasn’t due to global treaties or a UN task force. It happened because we unlocked dense, portable, and reliable energy from ‘fossil fuels’.
Let’s be clear: nearly every measurable improvement in human well-being since 1850 can be traced back to the power of coal, oil, and natural gas.
And no matter how fervently activists try to paint ‘fossil fuels’ as the villain in their climate morality play, they remain the reason billions are alive and thriving today.
Just look at the image below. It’s not speculation… It’s history.
The top panel shows global ‘fossil fuel’ consumption over time. From 1800 to 1900, it creeps along. But starting around 1900, ‘fossil fuel’ use begins to rise… and then explodes in the post-World War II era.
This is coal, oil, and gas powering the engines of modernity.
The bottom panel shows something even more staggering: life expectancy across regions over the same time period. For thousands of years, it was stuck in the low 30s.
Then, suddenly, it soars upward. Europe. Asia. Africa. The Americas. Oceania. Every continent. Every region.
There’s no other variable that explains this parallel shift. Not democracy. Not climate regulation. Not ‘renewables’. The timing is too perfect. The magnitude too dramatic. This wasn’t an accident.
This was ‘fossil fuels’, powering water purification, sanitation infrastructure, refrigeration, antibiotics, heating and cooling systems, plastics for sterile hospitals, transportation for vaccines, and of course, the Haber-Bosch process that unlocked synthetic fertilizer.
This one-two punch of energy abundance and chemical innovation more than doubled human life expectancy worldwide.
That’s not a side effect. That is the legacy of ‘fossil fuels’.
As I laid out in my earlier piece, “Nearly Half the World’s Population Relies on Synthetic Fertilizers Made from Fossil Fuels,” modern agriculture is utterly dependent on fossil fuels.
The Haber-Bosch process uses hydrogen from natural gas to fix nitrogen into ammonia, the foundation of synthetic fertilizers.
This process feeds over three billion people.
Remove it, and the global food supply collapses. Not becomes expensive… collapses. Starvation on a scale humanity has never seen.
And despite green fantasy claims, there are no scalable, economically viable alternatives to the fossil-fueled fertilizer system today. None. The rapid cessation of ‘fossil fuel’ use, if followed through, is not just a policy misstep; it’s a death sentence for half the planet.
In “What Would a World Without ‘Fossil Fuels’ Look Like?” I showed how deeply ‘fossil fuels’ are embedded in our modern lives. Petrochemicals aren’t just in gasoline… they’re in:
- IV tubing and sterile packaging
- Insulin and antibiotic precursors
- Electronic components and medical devices
- Food preservation, cold storage, and logistics
- Sanitation systems, water pumps, and sewage treatment
These aren’t conveniences. These are the bedrock of public health. And all of it is powered by the fuels we’re told are destroying the world.
Even if you believe that ‘fossil fuels’ are responsible for all of the 1.1°C warming since 1850, a claim I find dubious at best, the benefits still outweigh the costs. Easily.
Global crop yields are at all-time highs. CO₂, the very molecule demonized as a ‘pollutant’, has boosted plant growth through enhanced fertilization.
Drought-adjusted food production is up. Famine is at an all-time low. And as I detailed in “Fossil Fuels’ Critical Role in Combating Heat Waves” deaths from heat waves are down, not up—precisely because ‘fossil fuels’ power air conditioning, refrigeration, and modern infrastructure.
There is no statistically valid increase in extreme weather events. No rising death toll from storms or floods. The data simply don’t support the catastrophe narrative.
What they do support is this: energy abundance leads to human resilience.
If ‘fossil fuels’ were a new technology today, they would be marketed as the greatest humanitarian breakthrough in history. And they are.
But because they emit CO₂, they’ve been slandered as the villain of our time.
That is not just dishonest… it’s dangerous.
The truth is, ‘fossil fuels’ didn’t just power the Industrial Revolution. They powered the survival revolution.
Billions are alive today because ‘fossil fuels’ made it possible.
See more here substack.com
Some bold emphasis added
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Terry Shipman
| #
History is SO inconvenient for climate alarmists.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Matthew,
You wrote “It happened because we unlocked dense, portable, and reliable energy from ‘fossil fuels’.” I disagree for long before humans began using coal to power the steam engines that some extremely talented human had invented a STEAM ENGINE other extremely talented humans had observed things they observed in the natural world which caused them to begin to bravely question other human’s previous ideas which had existed for thousands of year’s. Just as I question what you just wrote.
And I doubt you have ever read Galileo Galilei’s famous book he wrote in the Italian language in 1638 or its translation to English by. Henry Crew and Alfonso de Salvio which was published in 1914. If what I claim about you is true; it makes you ignorant of the true history of that we call PHYSICAL SCIENCE.
Have a good day
Reply
Lloyd
| #
OF COURSE you disagree. You exist to disagree. The point is that fossil fuels created our modern culture and ability to increase survival.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Lloyd,
My point is that talented people created our modern culture and ability to increase survival.
Have a good day
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Lloyd,
In my previous comment I forgot to mention a critical attribute of these talented people. They were all HARD WORKING!
Reply
Aaron
| #
Hi Jerry
YOU probably should not BELIEVE everything you THINK
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi PSI Editor,
I have two posted comments which have disappeared.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi PSI Editor,
As I write this I KNOW two comments have been posted but now none exist.
Reply