HOW DID THEY SAY COVID VACCINES WERE “SAFE
Our senior health bureaucrats and politicians claimed from the beginning that the COVID-19 injections were “safe”.
How were they able to do this when such a claim was previously unlawful for any drug and the injections were not supported by the usual quality, safety and efficacy data required for full regulatory approval?
How can we ever trust them again?
CLICK HERE to view an interview (60 min) with Prof. Gigi Foster (Prof. of Economics, Univ. of NSW), Graham Hood (Ex-Qantas Captain “Hoody”) and John Larter (ex-ambulance officer) aired 5 Oct. on Clubgrubbery.com.au which explains how it was done. Plus a discussion of the proposed and terrifying “Misinformation/Disinformation Bill aimed at destroying free speech so government fake narratives (like COVID injections are “safe”) cannot be challenged easily in future.
GOOD SPIKE PROTEIN DETOX ADVICE FROM ONE OF THE BEST
Dr. Peter McCullough is one of the top cardiologists in the world. Listen (30 min) to his advice (1 Oct.) on detoxing Spike Protein, Pfizer lawsuits, hiding COVID data, children and the shots, which shots were most dangerous and more……(30min). CLICK HERE to view.
See more here Substack
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATI ONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Tom
| #
How? The exact same way that all big pharma drugs are promoted…THEY LIED and always will lie.
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
As I wrote in one of my recent blog posts (https://bioanalyticx.com/fda-approval-what-does-it-mean/), worldwide authorities, including the FDA, CDC, USP, etc., drug approvals are not based on scientific investigations or logical considerations but on compliance with their arbitrary requirements and standards.
There is a gross misunderstanding among the public, including medical experts, that the approved products are based on science (advanced or sophisticated). Not at all. They set up some arbitrary standards and then show some laboratory work/pictures/numbers (most unrelated) to make their claims.
A recent example is the COVID-19 virus. Authorities first assume (when there is none) that there is a virus and then develop some experiments, like culturing, “sequencing,” PCR, pictures, etc., to say here is proof for the virus.
No toxicity/pathogenicity of the virus has ever been established because no virus sample is available. Similarly, vaccine safety and efficacy cannot be established as no pure and isolated vaccine (mRNA) sample is available. Safety and efficacy are assumed.
It’s all fake and false (aka medical/pharmaceutical science).
Reply